Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Active  | Guidelines  | Search
 

Quick Go »
No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Active
Total posts in this thread: 5
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 1528 times and has 4 replies Next Thread
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Google, prefetches and Firefox

Today I read an article in the Inquirer at ( http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=23051 ) titled ‘How to block Google’s web accelerator’. It seems that Google has just issued a beta version of a ‘web accelerator’ that causes all normal http web requests to go through a Google server. Google’s server saves the web page, the time you accessed it, the connection you used, etc. It does not handle https web pages, the secured protocol pages used for credit cards. This can eventually lead to faster web surfing on your part, at least if you use the high-bandwidth connection that it is optimized for.

In addition, it installs a web page cache on your hard drive, separate from the browser web cache, and stores some web pages there, so you do not even need to request them over the internet. And it prefetches web pages it thinks you might link to next, storing them on your hard disk in the accelerator cache.

Of course, this is beta software, and some people have already received other people’s web pages. This is really a nightmare for corporate security, since people in their company, accessing the corporate site, are storing web views outside the corporate net on Google’s servers if they have Google web accelerator on their computer. So some corporations are hastily blocking connections from the Google server IP addresses.

I read the Google description of their web accelerator at http://webaccelerator.google.com/support and decided that I would treat this particular program like I would a case of bubonic plague.

But the Google prefetch operation led me to http://www.tweakguides.com/Firefox_1.html which is a very good description of tweaks for Firefox, where I learned to my horror that the standard Google query prefetches web pages by default for Firefox. If I make a Google inquiry with Firefox, then Google can prefetch the web page that it thinks I am most likely to choose from the list of results sent from that inquiry and store it in my browser cache area on my hard disk. The last page of the tweak guide told me that the innocuous-sounding network.prefetch-next variable in about:config which is set to true by default allows Google to do this. I typed in ‘about:config’ in my Firefox browser address and double-clicked on network.prefetch-next to turn it to false. This is the only advanced tweak I have ever applied to Firefox, but I am very cautious about prefetches. I have always warned friends that Outlook Express should never be allowed to preview email, because that can activate viruses in emails that they do not open.

mycrofth
[May 6, 2005 9:31:37 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Google, prefetches and Firefox

Could I just second mycrofth's concern regarding Google's new "Web accelerator"

It claims to boost the speed of your broadband surfing but why you need to do this is anyone's guess. Compared with good old V90 modem's broadband goes like lightening anyway.

All your web page requests go via Google's proxy servers which when you are on this side of the pond (I'm in the UK) adds additional latency to every request you make to a website which slows it down not speed it up.

Throw in there the security risk, the additional bandwidth use for the pre fetches, and Google's Big Brother info gathering of everyone's surfing through the service means that mycrofth's likening it to a case of bubonic plague is not far off the mark.

Still a big fan of Google Desktop though.

Sam
[May 7, 2005 10:55:36 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Desktop Searching

Desktop searching is not something I do enough to have an opinion about, but there is an interesting article on Windows Desktop Search Tools at http://arstechnica.com/reviews/apps/desktop-search.ars/1 dated 4 April 2005. It rates MSN Desktop Search and Copernic Desktop Search as the most useful, then Google Desktop Search and then Yahoo! Desktop Search.

Ars Technica also has an early (4 May 2005) article on the Google Web Accelerator at http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20050504-4880.html
[May 8, 2005 11:15:37 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Still a few bugs in the system

An article from The Register: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/05/13/google_accelerator_suspended/

Google puts the brake on Web Accelerator
By John Leyden
Published Friday 13th May 2005 13:49 GMT

Google has disabled downloads of its Web Accelerator software less than a week after introducing the service. The suspension follows reports that the software was caching sensitive content, such as user control panels to online forums.

The beta application, a free browser plug-in that for use with IE 5.5 and above or Firefox 1.0 on Win 2000 or XP, is designed to speed up online surfing. Google stopped downloads on 11 May just six days after its 5 May release saying that the capacity limit of the trial had been reached. "We have currently reached our maximum capacity of users and are actively working to increase the number of users we can support," it said in a statement on the Web Accelerator home page.

The technology used information including data about user search patterns to pre-fetch and cache frequently requested content, thereby speeding access to (basic) web content. Analyst Gartner said the application had limited appeal because it wouldn't help to download media files any faster. It wasn't long before privacy activists started raising questions of their own about the service.

Aside from giving Google unprecedented insight into user's surfing habits the application came under fire from punters for caching sensitive information, such as user control panels from forums. As a result surfers with the software installed reported they were getting logged onto forums such as SomethingAwful.com as other users. There's no suggestion that online banking records on other content from secure ecommerce sites was turning up in the cache. The disquietening behaviour seems to be limited to sites visited by many other beta users of the software.

Google has s yet to respond to our repeated requests for comment. ®
[May 14, 2005 4:37:47 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Still a few bugs in the system

beat up
[May 14, 2005 10:09:52 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread