Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Active  | Guidelines  | Search
 

Quick Go »
No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Active
Total posts in this thread: 22
Posts: 22   Pages: 3   [ Previous Page | 1 2 3 ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 3478 times and has 21 replies Next Thread
PaKo7
Cruncher
Joined: Apr 4, 2007
Post Count: 7
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Normal work unit run time?

I've made a similar observation as LoneWolf above. On the same equipment with the same computing schedule, and compared to other projects, HCMD2 has, for validated tasks, awarded substantially fewer points and CPU hours during the same stretch of calendar time.
[Sep 11, 2009 12:19:08 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher
Joined: Jul 24, 2005
Post Count: 20043
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Normal work unit run time?

Suspect it's a function of less / more positions in a 6 hour job over a 4 hour job, therefor the credit calculation becoming more precise. Certainly HCMD2 gave very high credit, well above the average of the other projects and still does (see chart above).
----------------------------------------
WCG Global & Research > Make Proposal Help: Start Here!
Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All!
[Sep 11, 2009 7:17:43 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Posts: 22   Pages: 3   [ Previous Page | 1 2 3 ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread