Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
![]() |
World Community Grid Forums
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
No member browsing this thread |
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 6
|
![]() |
Author |
|
dondee
Advanced Cruncher Joined: Jan 16, 2006 Post Count: 100 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I can't seem to find a better place to put this, so if I am in the wrong place guide me to the right one.
I am upgrading a computer and using a phenom ll X2 550BE. I would like to overclock it. What I need to know is if WCG likes high multiplier or high fsb, or even if this varies with each project. I have run other projects and it seems they each have a preference. I am checking the configuration with OCCT and Prime 95 so to keep the computational quality of the as high as possible. So far I have had little luck with high overclock so the speed keeps going down, this may be a lost cause before long anyway. I like to overclock but accuracy and quality are first concern, speed has little value if the results are wrong. Thanks |
||
|
retsof
Former Community Advisor USA Joined: Jul 31, 2005 Post Count: 6824 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Overclocking is possible, but some project calculations can abort even if Prime95 runs clean. Multiplier changes are the most painless, especially if you have a Black Edition with unlocked multiplier. Make changes slowly and try a few workunits each time. If they abort (usually after only a very short period), back off. An AMD 2.4GHz and 3.2GHz systems here did not like to be overclocked. THe second was sensitive to ambient room temperature. A newer AMD 2.0GHz chip happily ran overclocked for me at 2.4GHz with no problems at all. I have found that a little more expensive memory with a better heat sink and very fast CAS parameters are helpful and will pay off in the long run for overclocking, since your computer is running at 100% 24/7. I did some googling for my particular AMD chips, and had found some nice, stable overclocking parameters, so I didn't have to start from scratch. I wouldn't increase voltages very much if at all. That would be about the point to quit, for this purpose, if you get that far. The computer would probably be stable for some uses, but not these intensive projects.
----------------------------------------
SUPPORT ADVISOR
----------------------------------------Work+GPU i7 8700 12threads School i7 4770 8threads Default+GPU Ryzen 7 3700X 16threads Ryzen 7 3800X 16 threads Ryzen 9 3900X 24threads Home i7 3540M 4threads50% [Edit 1 times, last edit by retsof at Aug 14, 2009 3:17:14 AM] |
||
|
dondee
Advanced Cruncher Joined: Jan 16, 2006 Post Count: 100 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thanks for the reply retsof.
So it is best to use a project to determine max speed than a stress program? |
||
|
Steve WCG
Senior Cruncher Joined: May 4, 2009 Post Count: 216 Status: Offline |
some project calculations can abort even if Prime95 runs clean. So it is best to use a project to determine max speed than a stress program? <intel experience only> I make 10 passes of LinX max memory, 1 pass HyperPi 32M, and then Prime Blend for 2 hours for my final OC test and have never had a WCG project crash due to OC. After that you can *usually* push a tiny bit higher OC and still be WCG stable but I don't think it is worth it as the first time you crash you may loose lots of crunching time which will take forever to make up based on the miniscule extra OC you were shooting for ![]() </intel> get it stable and let it run 24/7 FTW ![]() Steve |
||
|
dondee
Advanced Cruncher Joined: Jan 16, 2006 Post Count: 100 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thanks for the reply Steve WCG.
I am a bit under the weather now, but I will find these programs later and try them out. I am beginning to think stable is more relative than I thought. |
||
|
nickoli
Senior Cruncher USA Joined: Nov 28, 2005 Post Count: 167 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I too have a question in regards to FSB:
----------------------------------------I'm looking at a system that will be 4 true cores, 8 all together. The system says it only has a FSB of 100mhz. That seems quite slow. Will that have a substantial affect on my crunching? ![]() |
||
|
|
![]() |