Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Active  | Guidelines  | Search
 

Quick Go »
No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Active
Total posts in this thread: 11
Posts: 11   Pages: 2   [ 1 2 | Next Page ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 1144 times and has 10 replies Next Thread
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Wildly Inaccurate "To Completion" times, WinXP & recommended client

I've just started running BOINC under WINXP (SP3) again, first 6.2.18 now 6.2.28 , and am recieving wildly innacurate times to completion on all the WCG workunits I have recieved so far, in the order of 400+ hours. All workunits have completed in the expected 4 to 7 hours. As far as I remember when I last ran BOINC under WinXP it didn't have this problem

I upgraded to BOINC 6.2.28 (WCG recommended client), but this makes no difference. Installed and running as a service, as I always do under Windows.

I haven't run BOINC under WinXP for a while, only Linux (without issues), so I don't know if this is a known issue, but I cant find any threads about it (BTW the forum search is terrible).
----------------------------------------
[Edit 3 times, last edit by Former Member at Apr 19, 2009 7:40:47 AM]
[Apr 19, 2009 7:21:34 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Wildly Inaccurate "To Completion" times, WinXP & recommended client

Wait for the times to adjust. Give it a few days.
[Apr 19, 2009 8:30:21 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Wildly Inaccurate "To Completion" times, WinXP & recommended client

My estimated times to completion are FINALLY back to normal. One month is a bit longer than "a few days", IMHO.
----------------------------------------
[Edit 2 times, last edit by Former Member at May 20, 2009 11:06:46 PM]
[May 20, 2009 11:05:22 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Wildly Inaccurate "To Completion" times, WinXP & recommended client

My estimated times to completion are FINALLY back to normal. One month is a bit longer than "a few days", IMHO.

It sounds like you think you were the only one affected. Welcome to the Club.
[May 20, 2009 11:15:25 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Wildly Inaccurate "To Completion" times, WinXP & recommended client

It's good to know I'm not alone. What was the cause?

Like I said in the OP, I normally ran BOINC under Linux, so if there was any news about this I missed it. I did do a forum seach but it came up empty. I also only run WCG these days, so I didn't check the other BOINC project forums.
----------------------------------------
[Edit 2 times, last edit by Former Member at May 20, 2009 11:25:15 PM]
[May 20, 2009 11:21:08 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Wildly Inaccurate "To Completion" times, WinXP & recommended client

Hello 5 and a half of 13,
We have started 2 new projects (FLU and HCMD2) and have had more than the normal trouble with HCMD2 work units. I expect that it will cause occasional trouble unless we develop a method for predicting the size of a work unit. Right now, a few HCMD2 work units are unexpectedly long.

Lawrence
[May 21, 2009 2:19:23 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher
Joined: Jul 24, 2005
Post Count: 20043
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Wildly Inaccurate "To Completion" times, WinXP & recommended client

Once upon a time I attempted to explain this yo yo ing, so here's the FAQ to which I currently have no words to add: http://worldcommunitygrid.org/forums/wcg/viewthread?thread=21550
----------------------------------------
WCG Global & Research > Make Proposal Help: Start Here!
Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All!
[May 21, 2009 7:06:27 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
gb009761
Master Cruncher
Scotland
Joined: Apr 6, 2005
Post Count: 3010
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Wildly Inaccurate "To Completion" times, WinXP & recommended client

Sekerob, is there anywhere in BOINC that you can see the estimated length of the total work in it's queue? (other than, manually counting it all up)
----------------------------------------

[May 21, 2009 11:33:48 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher
Joined: Jul 24, 2005
Post Count: 20043
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Wildly Inaccurate "To Completion" times, WinXP & recommended client

At Berkeley they suffer from missed opportunities. Client 6.6 now has a properties screen both for project and task. At project level I would have expected such information... but it is not, so we continue to use BOINCview which says my quad has 4 days, 11 hours 43 minutes, 41 seconds worth of work queued.... that's 1 day and 3 hours per core, even when the buffer is set to hold 0.81 presently.

On the upside, the properties screen does show the current rDCF of 1.29, up from yesterday 1.18, so the current jobs are taking longer than expected.

PS, maybe if you delve into the client_state.xml you could find the value too. Let us know if you do.
----------------------------------------
WCG Global & Research > Make Proposal Help: Start Here!
Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All!
[May 21, 2009 11:52:32 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
gb009761
Master Cruncher
Scotland
Joined: Apr 6, 2005
Post Count: 3010
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Wildly Inaccurate "To Completion" times, WinXP & recommended client

Thanks Sekerob for your reply.

As I don't have an awful lot of spare time at the moment and a very long list (curtesy of HCMD2) waiting processing, I'll have to come back to this later.

BTW, what is this BOINCview you mention?, is it an add-on to the core BOINC system, and if so, is there a recommended version/link for it?
----------------------------------------

[May 21, 2009 1:00:08 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Posts: 11   Pages: 2   [ 1 2 | Next Page ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread