Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Active  | Guidelines  | Search
 

Quick Go »
No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Active
Total posts in this thread: 22
Posts: 22   Pages: 3   [ Previous Page | 1 2 3 | Next Page ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 3181 times and has 21 replies Next Thread
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
cool Re: CSX600 co-processor

I confess that I am dumbfounded by the decision to build a Dual Coprocessor board rather than a single coprocessor board. As for the price!! Perhaps the reporter got it wrong. Maybe I should go on paging through Google looking for an estimated price? Nahh... I will wait until there is a street price. Somebody will comment on it when it is finally released.

Lawrence
[Apr 11, 2005 1:52:00 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: CSX600 co-processor

I've been talking to an OEM. I should be able to find out this week but now that I know Rosetta doesn't support BLAS, I probably won't spend alot of time on it. I have found an electronics parts warehouse outlet and it looks like they may have the CS301.

http://www.electronicproducts.com/ShowPage.as...mp;FileName=hl4w3.nov2003
[Apr 11, 2005 2:03:09 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: CSX600 co-processor

It looks like Folding@Home is all over this:

http://www.clearspeed.com/news/pr.php?pr=23

Time for WCG to step up or "fold" cool
[Apr 17, 2005 7:33:20 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: CSX600 co-processor

By reading some of the comments on the Folding@Home forum it sounds like something is up but the principles involved can't say anything about it. I don't think we'll have too much longer to wait before news is released.
[Apr 17, 2005 11:07:25 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
cool Re: CSX600 co-processor

Based on the dates, the PCI card referred to must be the CS301 (< $1,000 per chip), not the CSX600 (estimated to run about $25,000 when it first becomes available, 2 chips per board). I suspect that not many members want to put out $50,000 for an add-in coprocessor board. I really find the estimate unconvincing, and want to see the real street price.
[Apr 17, 2005 11:11:19 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: CSX600 co-processor

This Physx chip has the potential for being very very cool! (and it probably won't cost 50,000 dollars, although you never know)

http://sysbioinfo.blogspot.com/
[Apr 27, 2005 12:36:39 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: CSX600 co-processor

'Physics' processor is a code word meaning 32-bit floating point. This is what the CELL processor uses in its 8 special processor units. Back in 2002-2003 Nvidia switched to 32-bit floating point in its new DX9.0 GPU, while ATI stayed with 24-bit floating point. I seem to recall that ATI's latest has just switched to 32-bit floating point, but may be wrong about this. The various streaming commands (SSE, etc.) use 32-bit floating point, except that some of these commands use fast table lookups that are only accurate to 12 bits in the mantissa.

All sorts of prospects are opening up for programs that are validated for single-precision floating point. Back in the 1970s this was an important area in practical (computational) numerical analysis, but when the Intel 8087 coprocessor was announced, everybody dropped single-precision floating point like a dead fish. Still, the Delorean is a really cool car!

Back to the future,
mycrofth
[Apr 27, 2005 3:40:10 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: CSX600 co-processor

What I'd like to know is why anyone would be holding a dead fish in the first place.
[Apr 27, 2005 4:33:47 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: CSX600 co-processor

Here is the Folding@Home page about ClearSpeed and GPUs: http://folding.stanford.edu/FAQ-highperformance.html

It is very interesting, but we still have to wait. sleep
December 2005 The CS hardware appears set to roll out in the Spring of 2006.

[Jan 30, 2006 9:16:57 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: CSX600 co-processor

The dual CSX600 board is selling for only $8,000.00. Discounts for quantity purchases. raised eyebrow
The Register has the story: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/11/18/clearspeed_silicon_sc06/
hypnotized
[Nov 20, 2006 10:13:40 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Posts: 22   Pages: 3   [ Previous Page | 1 2 3 | Next Page ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread