Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Active  | Guidelines  | Search
 

Quick Go »
No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Active
Total posts in this thread: 4
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 1178 times and has 3 replies Next Thread
Crystal Pellet
Veteran Cruncher
Joined: May 21, 2008
Post Count: 1411
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Excuse Me! - Short CEP's are the valid ones?

Project Name: The Clean Energy Project
Created: 6-12-08
Name: E000027_324A_00035r00u
Minimum Quorum: 2
Initial Replication: 3

E000027_ 324A_ 00035r00u_ 4-- Valid 21-12-08 03:55:47 21-12-08 11:55:26 2.31 52.5 / 47.0
E000027_ 324A_ 00035r00u_ 3-- Invalid 19-12-08 18:12:48 21-12-08 15:04:02 40.69 683.8 / 47.0
E000027_ 324A_ 00035r00u_ 2-- Valid 19-12-08 06:01:31 19-12-08 18:05:39 2.38 41.4 / 47.0
E000027_ 324A_ 00035r00u_ 0-- Error 14-12-08 00:29:13 19-12-08 05:48:42 48.83 651.5 / 0.0
E000027_ 324A_ 00035r00u_ 1-- Invalid 14-12-08 00:25:05 16-12-08 20:10:22 45.35 637.1 / 47.0

I can't imagine that this is true. The short ones are not mine so I do not know, if they ended with:
[ERROR] Failed to open either source or destination files while copying wcgrestart.rst to ../../projects/www.worldcommunitygrid.org/E000000...........

The result log of the WU with the longest runtime:
<core_client_version>6.2.19</core_client_version>
<![CDATA[
<stderr_txt>
Calling initGraphics()
INFO: No state to restore. Start from the beginning.
####Message = NORMAL STOP
called boinc_finish

</stderr_txt>
]]>
[Dec 22, 2008 9:11:34 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Excuse Me! - Short CEP's are the valid ones?

This is widely discussed elsewhere.
[Dec 22, 2008 9:25:05 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Crystal Pellet
Veteran Cruncher
Joined: May 21, 2008
Post Count: 1411
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Excuse Me! - Short CEP's are the valid ones?

This is widely discussed elsewhere.

Discussion alone is no solution. Because of the widespread discussion it's clear that a lot is wrong with this software version.
It would be better to say clearly 'Sorry' and stop distribution of WU's of this false start of The Clean Energy Project.
Do a very good test on the new version (creepy silent atm), and restart with reliable software and validation.
You CA's are of course not responsible for this situation, but researchers and/or techs should be honesty looking in the mirror and say: "This start was not a success, so retry".
CA's thanks for your patience.
[Dec 22, 2008 2:20:48 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Crystal Pellet
Veteran Cruncher
Joined: May 21, 2008
Post Count: 1411
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Excuse Me! - Short CEP's are the valid ones?

Greetings,

We are encountering a larger number of errors/invalid results with The Clean Energy Project than anticipated. We are sending some of the initial results to the researcher for them to look at and get a resolution to this problem.

Also, with this project we are seeing some really long work units pass through member machines. This usually creates larger result files.

-Uplinger


[Dec 22, 2008 5:20:26 PM]

Thanks Uplinger for taking action.

Regards
[Dec 22, 2008 5:37:16 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread