| Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
 |
World Community Grid Forums
Category: Beta Testing
Forum: Beta Test Support Forum
Thread: HPF2 Beta 5 Version 6.05 |
| No member browsing this thread |
|
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 15
|
|
| Author |
|
|
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher Joined: Jul 24, 2005 Post Count: 20043 Status: Offline |
Received several and all bombed within minutes on Vista Quad. New log line, i think.
----------------------------------------<core_client_version>6.2.18</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <message> Funzione non corretta. (0x1) - exit code 1 (0x1) </message> <stderr_txt> ####1666521 too many iterations in dfpmin ERROR:: Exit at: .\dock_structure.cc line:401 </stderr_txt> ]]> [Edit: Actually, just see that the same line was reported with the 6.04 beta]
WCG
----------------------------------------Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All! [Edit 1 times, last edit by Sekerob at Oct 8, 2008 9:23:10 PM] |
||
|
|
Rickjb
Veteran Cruncher Australia Joined: Sep 17, 2006 Post Count: 666 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
I received and crunched 1 WU (BETA_ ly528_ 00013_ 24--) at High Priority. It ran for 7.34 hrs and about 1 hr ago was "Pending Validation". I did not then examine its Result Log. Now, like several of its peers, it has been declared "Too late". Its result log is very short, different and shorter than Sek's above, but also appears to show an error.
----------------------------------------A64 X2, Win 2K, BOINC 6.2.19 Many peers on this WU returned after several minutes with Error status, but 1 other peer (so far) also crunched for 7.0 hrs, and is "Too late". A thought was that BOINC 6.2.19 is not detecting an error and aborting the WU, while the clients of the peers that errored after several minutes are behaving correctly. However, Sek uses 6.2.18, which I would expect to behave in the same way. (Edit): 1. Second thoughts on why some WUs aborted after only a few minutes, (while some crunched onwards - the error symptoms reported in my Resuilt Log are different to those to Sek's above. Here's mine: <core_client_version>6.2.19</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <stderr_txt> ####598121 called boinc_finish </stderr_txt> ]]> 2.To posters below - I think the "Too Late" declarations are some kind of error artifact. Weird things are happening. 1 peer returned his WU in 15h52m and still has status "Pending": BETA_ly528_00013_17-- | Pending Validation | 8/10/08 21:10:51 | 9/10/08 13:02:50 | 7.24 | 118.2 / 0.0 I returned mine after only 7h23m, and I was "Too Late": BETA_ly528_00013_24-- | Too Late | 8/10/08 21:17:43 | 9/10/08 04:40:31 | 7.34 | 120.0 / 0.0 (Later declared Valid) [Edit 3 times, last edit by Rickjb at Oct 10, 2008 4:38:28 PM] |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Crunched one WU BETA_ ly528_ 00012_ 6-- but came back too late.
Since there were 14 WU all returned too late, 5 with errors and 5 No reply out of 31 WU sent out, and only 1 at pending at this time, maybe you would consider upgrading the Too late to Pending Validation |
||
|
|
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher Joined: Jul 24, 2005 Post Count: 20043 Status: Offline |
Sound more like a gaffe in the department of setting the "rush" parm. Blame it on me and many not getting 2 minutes per the detail result info
---------------------------------------- BETA_ ly528_ 00015_ 22-- No Reply 8-10-08 21:19:16 9-10-08 06:55:16 0.00 0.0 / 0.0 BETA_ ly528_ 00015_ 21-- Too Late 8-10-08 21:18:46 9-10-08 09:01:12 9.06 124.4 / 0.0 BETA_ ly528_ 00015_ 20-- Error 8-10-08 21:17:51 8-10-08 21:20:24 0.02 0.4 / 0.0 BETA_ ly528_ 00015_ 19-- Error 8-10-08 21:17:06 8-10-08 21:20:07 0.02 0.3 / 0.0 BETA_ ly528_ 00015_ 6-- Too Late 8-10-08 21:16:40 9-10-08 04:25:31 7.13 87.7 / 0.0 BETA_ ly528_ 00015_ 5-- Error 8-10-08 21:16:38 8-10-08 21:21:34 0.03 0.5 / 0.0 BETA_ ly528_ 00015_ 8-- Error 8-10-08 21:16:17 8-10-08 21:21:06 0.03 0.5 / 0.0 BETA_ ly528_ 00015_ 4-- Error 8-10-08 21:16:05 8-10-08 21:21:21 0.04 0.5 / 0.0 BETA_ ly528_ 00015_ 3-- Too Late 8-10-08 21:16:00 9-10-08 11:56:01 9.91 76.2 / 0.0 BETA_ ly528_ 00015_ 7-- Too Late 8-10-08 21:15:53 9-10-08 07:21:51 10.05 80.7 / 0.0 BETA_ ly528_ 00015_ 2-- Too Late 8-10-08 21:15:42 9-10-08 01:29:34 4.21 94.7 / 0.0 BETA_ ly528_ 00015_ 1-- Error 8-10-08 21:15:30 8-10-08 21:21:48 0.02 0.3 / 0.0 BETA_ ly528_ 00015_ 9-- Error 8-10-08 21:15:26 8-10-08 21:24:40 0.02 0.5 / 0.0 BETA_ ly528_ 00015_ 0-- Too Late 8-10-08 21:15:26 9-10-08 07:28:51 9.44 92.0 / 0.0 BETA_ ly528_ 00015_ 10-- Error 8-10-08 21:15:23 8-10-08 21:18:00 0.02 0.4 / 0.0 BETA_ ly528_ 00015_ 14-- Error 8-10-08 21:15:12 8-10-08 21:16:25 0.00 0.0 / 0.0 BETA_ ly528_ 00015_ 18-- No Reply 8-10-08 21:14:46 9-10-08 06:50:46 0.00 0.0 / 0.0 BETA_ ly528_ 00015_ 17-- Too Late 8-10-08 21:14:33 9-10-08 11:42:07 8.42 119.1 / 0.0 BETA_ ly528_ 00015_ 16-- Error 8-10-08 21:14:26 8-10-08 21:17:08 0.02 0.4 / 0.0 BETA_ ly528_ 00015_ 12-- Too Late 8-10-08 21:14:20 9-10-08 07:40:04 8.62 74.4 / 0.0 BETA_ ly528_ 00015_ 15-- Error 8-10-08 21:14:10 8-10-08 21:16:52 0.02 0.5 / 0.0 BETA_ ly528_ 00015_ 13-- No Reply 8-10-08 21:13:32 9-10-08 06:49:32 0.00 0.0 / 0.0 BETA_ ly528_ 00015_ 11-- Error 8-10-08 21:13:28 8-10-08 21:18:40 0.02 0.4 / 0.0 BETA_ ly528_ 00015_ 23-- Other 1-1-70 00:00:00 1-1-70 00:00:00 0.00 0.0 / 0.0 BETA_ ly528_ 00015_ 24-- Other 1-1-70 00:00:00 1-1-70 00:00:00 0.00 0.0 / 0.0 BETA_ ly528_ 00015_ 25-- Other 1-1-70 00:00:00 1-1-70 00:00:00 0.00 0.0 / 0.0 BETA_ ly528_ 00015_ 26-- Other 1-1-70 00:00:00 1-1-70 00:00:00 0.00 0.0 / 0.0 BETA_ ly528_ 00015_ 27-- Other 1-1-70 00:00:00 1-1-70 00:00:00 0.00 0.0 / 0.0 BETA_ ly528_ 00015_ 28-- Other 1-1-70 00:00:00 1-1-70 00:00:00 0.00 0.0 / 0.0 Suggestion: If there is the "fast/reliable client" rating of 21 hours, set the rock bottom deadline for all projects to this value i.e. whatever the outcome, a "no less than" rule.
WCG
Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All! |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
These lines are from my Results Status this morning:
BETA_ ly528_ 00008_ 28-- Gregson Too Late 10/9/08 06:37:08 10/9/08 12:18:10 5.67 89.8 / 0.0 BETA_ ly528_ 00033_ 2-- Garrideb Too Late 10/8/08 21:27:38 10/9/08 02:38:13 5.17 92.0 / 0.0 BETA_ ly528_ 00016_ 2-- Garrideb Valid 10/8/08 21:18:28 10/9/08 02:12:57 4.89 87.1 / 93.5 The first work unit shown ran for 5.67 hours. The interval between the Sent Time and the Return Time is 5.68 hours. How can it be "Too Late"? The second work unit show also completed in the mimimum possible time. These are both fast machines without any other work taking place during these hours. |
||
|
|
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher Joined: Jul 24, 2005 Post Count: 20043 Status: Offline |
It can and it will if a parm was mis entered. In past credit was corrected manually i.e. points given, but more importantly which is why this is BETA, your result seem to have run properly so the programmers get maximum information out of your contribution.
----------------------------------------thanks
WCG
Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All! |
||
|
|
mikaok
Senior Cruncher Finland Joined: Aug 8, 2006 Post Count: 489 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
I guess the return time of BETA wu's is set so early, so that the BOINC client would understand to run it in high priority? This time I started to crunch two hours after the WU was supposed to be returned, so it was 8 hours late or so. Still, I have always gotten credits for these wu's and this time it was no exception.
----------------------------------------
to infinity and beyond
 |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
It can and it will if a parm was mis entered. In past credit was corrected manually i.e. points given, but more importantly which is why this is BETA, your result seem to have run properly so the programmers get maximum information out of your contribution. Sorry, but I am not sure of what is going to happen with these Too Late WU. Are they going to get credit, not going to get credit, or going to get credit if further examination determines that they might get credit? We don't deserve credit if the results are unusable, but if it is just a bad parameter that is generating the Too Late............. |
||
|
|
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher Joined: Jul 24, 2005 Post Count: 20043 Status: Offline |
It can and it will if a parm was mis entered. In past credit was corrected manually i.e. points given, but more importantly which is why this is BETA, your result seem to have run properly so the programmers get maximum information out of your contribution. Sorry, but I am not sure of what is going to happen with these Too Late WU. Are they going to get credit, not going to get credit, or going to get credit if further examination determines that they might get credit? We don't deserve credit if the results are unusable, but if it is just a bad parameter that is generating the Too Late............. emphasis by me 
WCG
Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All! |
||
|
|
petehardy
Senior Cruncher USA Joined: May 4, 2007 Post Count: 318 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
I got credit for my "Too Late" WU, it was about 8 hours late.
---------------------------------------- "Patience is a virtue", I can't wait to learn it! |
||
|
|
|