Scribe, the other thread on "single redundancy" reports 1. Please tag on there, at least read. It's probably a point 4 condition where something is not right, but we need to get the back up copy to come back to see how the credits work out AND OR, if those go too bleary eyed, at which time the batch may need checking.

Anyway, my last few validated needing no second copy.

dddt0602j0569_ 100226_ 0-- 95711 Valid 08/08/2008 20:16:58 08/12/2008 11:36:04 7.60 79.0 / 78.8

Will ask the techs, but half is on vacation this week, for a change.

Makes sense to cross reference if you do that next time, so we know we know you saw it. Helps me to help you and stops me from wasting time (very fat )

[Added: mreuter80 did find a piece of text in another post of knreed that was not integrated into the 4 point rule clarification. Anyway, it suggests that the mini wu test failed.... verbatim:
The second copy, once validated, forms the logical base for awarding 50% credited for an invalid result. We'll hear if that does not happen I'm sure.

I have 3 dddt valid today, 2 the day before, 3 before that and 2 before that. No Invalids posted yet.

...mine were the same! The other result had higher claims than me, so I was granted higher points....maybe they should look at the mini calculations again?