The original credit idea was based on "effort", so don't worry about overclaiming on a slow computer. If you're lucky, you'll get two slow computers working on the same one.

We should not be using special hardware language extensions on these workunits. Perhaps it was just a strange workunit.

I have just moved the computers to HCC because they are SHORT workunits now. (at least until I get a look at the new DDD-T)

On the same fast computer, I just finished a couple of HCC in less than 5 hours each. The new FAAH version 6.03 was over 20 hours and over 9 hours by comparison. I don't think you'd want to mess with those.

The PIII is getting to be borderline, though, for some of the newly intensive work.

Except that on a P3, they are not that short. On a P3/866, HCC WUs average about 27 hours, while HPF2 average is about 31 hours. HPF2 takes about 1.15 times as long for 2.25 times the credit! Using a P3 on HCC is appears to be extremely inefficient and hence a really bad idea.

(see my table on this thread)

mitch did my explanation not work in the other post or was not understood? Same member name, just create the school, work or home BOINC profile (My Grid > Device Manager > Device Profiles), select the project and associate that profile in Device Manager with any of the devices of choice. It all stays under same member, thus under same CPID (long as you don't change the email address).

No, they appear immediately in Device Manager. It's the My Devices where they don't show until a statistics update ran and those devices having reported a result in the previous day segment. They fall off the screen again if no result comes through about 7 or 14 days after last result, but you can make them visible again with the filter options.