Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Active  | Guidelines  | Search
 

Quick Go »
No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Active
Total posts in this thread: 17
Posts: 17   Pages: 2   [ Previous Page | 1 2 ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 2483 times and has 16 replies Next Thread
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
rose Re: Crunching Speed vs. Size of Molecule

I don't use the screensaver even though I do have a plasma screen...I think....I am under the impression that screensavers alone use a lot of cpu resources. My computer does go into power down mode though. Is that as good as using a screensaver? I would think that uses resources better. confused Right now I am deviding time between Seti and WCG by exiting one program or the other...LOL
[Feb 21, 2005 7:56:47 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
cool Re: Crunching Speed vs. Size of Molecule

Screensavers do use some computer power for their graphics. Blank is the exception. It simply blanks the screen when the time is reached to load a screensaver. Power down is even better, since it also saves electricity. But in case you ever change the power down settings, it is a good idea to have blank in reserve. Some new plasma screens never have to worry about burn-in, but why take chances?
[Feb 21, 2005 9:33:08 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Crunching Speed vs. Size of Molecule

I am not sure if I understand your post properly. Are you saying that running WCG in screen saver only mode is not as efficient for the grid?
[Mar 1, 2005 2:02:01 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Crunching Speed vs. Size of Molecule

Joshua --

Since Lawrence is offline for a couple days getting his system upgraded, I will respond for him. He is saying that running WCG in screen saver mode is not as efficient for the grid. The grid software, because it runs at the priority of the idle process (absolutely the lowest priority on the system), will only get processor cycles when there are nothing else needs them. So, since a normal screensaver uses processor cycles to generate its animated graphics, the grid software has to wait. I hope this answers your question.

Regards,
[Mar 1, 2005 5:27:25 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
cool Re: Crunching Speed vs. Size of Molecule

I just do the little magic trick on my computer I call Turn of Monitor. It's a great alternative to the blank screensaver, and it saves power too! biggrin wink cool
[Mar 1, 2005 6:50:22 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Dreamshaper
Advanced Cruncher
Joined: Jan 8, 2005
Post Count: 96
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Crunching Speed vs. Size of Molecule

If a monitor is turned off, does the computer know (or care) the monitor's off? If it doesn't, it would continue computing the screensaver (or any other graphical component of an application), wasting CPU cycles that could be spent on the Grid (or electricity on your bill)

Would the answer vary by computer or monitor model?
----------------------------------------
O God, I could be bounded in a nutshell and count myself a king of infinite space, were it not that I have bad dreams. (Hamlet)"
[Mar 10, 2005 4:33:06 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Crunching Speed vs. Size of Molecule

I meant it as in no screen saver at the desktop. wink
[Mar 10, 2005 11:32:11 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Posts: 17   Pages: 2   [ Previous Page | 1 2 ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread