Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Active  | Guidelines  | Search
 

Quick Go ยป
No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Active
Total posts in this thread: 6
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 697 times and has 5 replies Next Thread
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Quick finishing W/U's

I'm using the latest version of BOINC (5.10.30) on a Intel Q6600 Quad, 2GB Memory, slightly overclocked machine running WIN-XP Home. I have noticed all of a sudden after downloading new work the w/u's are all finishing after approximately 1.40-1.55 minutes. I was previously using an earlier version that did the same thing. BOINCView indicates successful completions. I can't varifiy successful completions at the moment due to Stats are currently running. All my eight other Quads and Core Duo machines are configured similarly but are completing w/u's in 2.5-4.0 hours depending on project running.

I was wondering if anyone else noticed similar events... thinking
[Dec 4, 2007 2:28:33 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Quick finishing W/U's

I don't know about your case but wait to see the results of those units you sent in.

On another note.. I have a E6600 running at 3.2 GHz which can finish Cancer/AIDS units in about 3-4 hours.

My new Q6600 at stock 2.4 GHz is taking 15 hours for a unit.. What in the world is up with that? =/ All cores are crunching, 4 units at a time, 100% CPU usage. What's up with this? Haven't been able to figure it out. 2 GB of RAM.

Both running on 5.10.22.
----------------------------------------
[Edit 1 times, last edit by Former Member at Dec 4, 2007 4:39:19 AM]
[Dec 4, 2007 4:38:33 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Quick finishing W/U's

I expect they will be invalid. However, it's unusual that results should finish so quickly without failing with an error. Can you check the error log for one of these workunits?
[Dec 4, 2007 4:43:03 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher
Joined: Jul 24, 2005
Post Count: 20043
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Quick finishing W/U's

Hi Night Owl,

The "slightly overclocked machine"? Undervolting and overclocking is an art-form that can go together with strange behaviour, and often goes together with "but not my rock solid machine" incredulous moan. raised eyebrow

My recommendation is to go back to base i.e. stock speed and see if the premature 'conclusions' do not occur anymore and run some thorough hardware tests. 1-1.5 Minutes duration jobs you'll find at other DC projects, but not here. The phenomena was reported here once or twice and obviously always converted from at the end to be 'Invalid'.

@Blizzie, that is likely the HCC jobs that in (un)certain configurations become very inefficient. Reading about a backward going TTC (Time to Completion) and graphics being displayed going together, it might in fact be a cause of promoting that inefficiency.... cant test to watch taskmaster as service installs i have don't provide graphics. Something is special that generates many Page Faults and a delta of that, but what? If only we'd be able to figure that out (Discussed finding in other long thread).

ttyl
----------------------------------------
WCG Global & Research > Make Proposal Help: Start Here!
Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All!
[Dec 4, 2007 9:46:28 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Quick finishing W/U's

Jerry, what projects are you crunching? The Dengue are very very fast!
[Dec 4, 2007 10:49:47 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
retsof
Former Community Advisor
USA
Joined: Jul 31, 2005
Post Count: 6824
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Quick finishing W/U's

Dengue workunits are fast, but not that fast. 25 minutes is about the best average around on a fast Intel "quad" Dual Core Duo. That was just pushing the 50 workunits/core/day line, so that was increased to 75 workunits/core/day for the moment. Even if you assigned all cores to the same workunit, I'm not sure you could get a normal one done in less than 2 minutes.

I can do one in about an hour on AMD 2.4Ghz, ranging from between 40 minutes and 1.5 hours. I have an AMD 3.2GHz X2 6400+ Black Edition waiting for memory, better mobo and some cables. It should be good for at least a 35 minute cost effective turnaround. The first AMD Phenoms are not fast enough to match the core speed of what I already have, so I went with the last gasp X2 for now.

Those one minute thingys sound like BOINC scheduler tests if they are just waiting. If they have truly completed, then I wonder whether they are some kind of leftovers, tests or mistakes. I haven't seen any, but I'm only doing DDD-T right now. Another overclocking thread has fast workunits coming out as "inconclusive", right on the edge of what is good and what is not. In that situation, WCG sends out more workunits to make sure and flip them to valid or invalid. I suspect that those will end up as invalids.
----------------------------------------
SUPPORT ADVISOR
Work+GPU i7 8700 12threads
School i7 4770 8threads
Default+GPU Ryzen 7 3700X 16threads
Ryzen 7 3800X 16 threads
Ryzen 9 3900X 24threads
Home i7 3540M 4threads50%
----------------------------------------
[Edit 6 times, last edit by retsof at Dec 4, 2007 2:09:36 PM]
[Dec 4, 2007 1:55:22 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread