Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Active  | Guidelines  | Search
 

Quick Go »
No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Active
Total posts in this thread: 2
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 822 times and has 1 reply Next Thread
Diana G.
Master Cruncher
Joined: Apr 6, 2005
Post Count: 3003
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Is this WU "really" valid?

faah2472_ ZINC05493244_ xmd02780_ 01_ 1-- Valid 10/12/2007 19:53:08 10/13/2007 12:12:07 0.00 0.0 / 0.0
faah2472_ ZINC05493244_ xmd02780_ 01_ 0-- Valid 10/12/2007 19:48:34 10/15/2007 11:00:54 6.32 74.6 / 0.0 <----mine

Thanks for checking :-)

Diana
----------------------------------------

[Oct 15, 2007 9:39:07 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Is this WU "really" valid?

Looks like that bug where Windows 98 claims no credit for a valid result.

The zero claim ought to be thrown out, though. Either something else is going on, or the check was overlooked.
[Oct 15, 2007 10:43:26 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread