Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Active  | Guidelines  | Search
 

Quick Go »
No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Active
Total posts in this thread: 5
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 897 times and has 4 replies Next Thread
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher
Joined: Jul 24, 2005
Post Count: 20043
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
The Why of: Increase runtime for BOINC work units 9/25/2007

Posted by uplinger at Sep 25, 2007 3:36:09 PM in Member News:

Increase runtime for BOINC work units 9/25/2007
Greetings,

We are increasing the runtime of the BOINC work units.

Previous average runtimes:
DDD-T 6.3 Hours
FAAH 5.5 Hours
HPF2 5.5 Hours

We have increased the lengths to be closer to a 7 hours average. This means that DDD-T work units will appear to run 10% longer. FAAH and HPF2 will appear to run 25% longer than before.

Thank you for participating in World Community Grid!

-Uplinger
Does one understand.... a little educated guessing?

Q: How is work extended so easily?
A: Pack more attempts in Work Units!

Q: How to establish that?
A: Those who've activated the Checkpoint Debug option will see more entries in the message log.

Q: Why doing this?
A: Reduce loads on certain elements of the server processes like Schedulers, Feeders, Validators, Transitiors etc

Q: Why now?
A1: With load reductions in quantitative terms, size per dataset not an issue, a probable ramp-up for the next
project addition to run concurrently.
A2: To make space for the strong growth seen post holiday season and college restarts.

Q: Anything else?
A: Enjoy conjecturing.... need to run.
----------------------------------------
WCG Global & Research > Make Proposal Help: Start Here!
Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All!
[Sep 25, 2007 7:47:36 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: The Why of: Increase runtime for BOINC work units 9/25/2007

Q: How is work extended so easily?
A: Pack more attempts in Work Units!


I'm still a little unclear about what is "packed" in each WU. I know more info is coming regarding DDDT.

Does that mean FAAH WUs are more than just 1 ligand --> 1 protein? If so, how many ligands per WU now? If not, I don't quite understand what exactly lengthening or shortening the runtime of a WU is actually doing. What do you mean by an "attempt"?

For HPF2, I'm assuming that means more structures folded per protein in a given WU?

Sorry for all the questions, and many thanks for any answers biggrin

I'm a nerd for the nitty-gritty details for what we're crunching nerd
----------------------------------------
[Edit 1 times, last edit by Former Member at Sep 25, 2007 8:50:28 PM]
[Sep 25, 2007 8:49:05 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: The Why of: Increase runtime for BOINC work units 9/25/2007

Hello esoteric17,
Each ligand can be flexed into many different shapes and each shape can be presented to the protein target from many vectors and orientations to see how well it docks. So each ligand has many attempted dockings. Similarly, there are an almost infinite number of shapes that HPF2 can try for a given protein. Nature has no trouble choosing a unique shape because even small changes in an atom's position can result in a noticeable change in energy levels. However, a computer cannot feel the atomic force fields so it changes the position slightly and then recomputes the energy levels.

Therefore, FAAH, DDDT and HPF2 make numerous 'attempts' in each work unit. The number of attempts is chosen when creating the work units on the server. More attempts per work unit mean fewer work units overall per ligand / protein. The total computer time remains constant even though the number of work units shrink.

Lawrence
[Sep 26, 2007 12:35:14 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
retsof
Former Community Advisor
USA
Joined: Jul 31, 2005
Post Count: 6824
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: The Why of: Increase runtime for BOINC work units 9/25/2007

My concern is that my slowest 0.5GHz Pentium III computer has been unhappy since the short WU GC project ended. It has been taking 30-36 hours for a FAAH. This change means that it will be nearly 2 days per workunit....hardly worth the heat buildup here, except for a lot of points eventually.
----------------------------------------
SUPPORT ADVISOR
Work+GPU i7 8700 12threads
School i7 4770 8threads
Default+GPU Ryzen 7 3700X 16threads
Ryzen 7 3800X 16 threads
Ryzen 9 3900X 24threads
Home i7 3540M 4threads50%
[Sep 26, 2007 3:35:54 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Sgt.Joe
Ace Cruncher
USA
Joined: Jul 4, 2006
Post Count: 7851
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: The Why of: Increase runtime for BOINC work units 9/25/2007

It is about the same for DDDT on my .397ghz. 30 - 35 hours, but at least the heat helps keep my basement warm. smile

Cheers
----------------------------------------
Sgt. Joe
*Minnesota Crunchers*
[Sep 27, 2007 12:19:31 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread