Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Active  | Guidelines  | Search
 

Quick Go »
No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Active
Total posts in this thread: 6
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 2872 times and has 5 replies Next Thread
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Actual and crunching members Completed

Hi, does anyone know how many active and crunching members there are on WCG, the stats show 306,192 members but I assume this includes non active and duplicate registered members.

When WCG shows me ranked 58,252 on points generated I would like to know against how many active and crunching members. Is there any link or web page that can give me this number?

dseto
----------------------------------------
[Edit 1 times, last edit by Former Member at Jun 23, 2007 2:28:40 PM]
[Jun 23, 2007 12:09:07 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher
Joined: Jul 24, 2005
Post Count: 20043
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Actual and crunching members

hi dseto,

it's frequently discussed and on the wish list of things to add to the statistics pages, I'm though not sure WCG would include the active member position.

Same goes for the active machines.... it's on the wish list.

I never pay attention to it, but as you run BOINC, the Boincstats statistics allow sorting on a number of criteria like daily, weekly, monthly, all time and more. There you are at spot 10850 momentarily:

http://www.boincstats.com/stats/user_stats.ph...st=10800&to=100#10850

Added: For the month you run on spot 3341 on BOINCstats:

http://www.boincstats.com/stats/user_stats.ph...amp;ti=&co=&date=

cheers
----------------------------------------
WCG Global & Research > Make Proposal Help: Start Here!
Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All!
----------------------------------------
[Edit 2 times, last edit by Sekerob at Jun 23, 2007 12:40:54 PM]
[Jun 23, 2007 12:32:54 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Actual and crunching members

Thank You for the info Sekerob

dseto
[Jun 23, 2007 2:28:12 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Actual and crunching members

I track active members for my team, defining "active" as someone who returned a result within the last 7 days. The active count is usually a little under half the total count. Today it is 615 / 1 332.

I expect the active count for the project as a whole isn't quite this good. As Sekerob touches on, there are various ways for estimating an active count. It's not an incredibly useful number even once we have it, though - WCG is more about "little and often" - they encourage members only to donate while their computers are normally turned on, and they are recruiting contributors from the general population, not just computer geeks, SETI enthusiasts and so on. People so interested in a project do tend to donate more time per person.

All of which rambling is intended to conclude: runtime metrics are far more interesting, and for a (well, almost) fair comparison between members, points take computer speed into account as well.
[Jun 23, 2007 2:57:37 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Actual and crunching members

there is some value to having an approximate estimate of active machines (say last 30 days).

that is, to avoid the 'credibility' problems suffered by some other crunching sites that were not very open about real situations.
[Jun 23, 2007 8:15:28 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher
Joined: Jul 24, 2005
Post Count: 20043
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Actual and crunching members

we will ask the techs if they can share, but you could deduce by approximation. The BOINC stats site reports the registered devices and the active devices and same for members.

http://www.boincstats.com/stats/project_graph.php?pr=wcg
 	Total	Active
Users 49,149 24,064
Hosts 156,316 155,275
Teams 5,355 3,209
Countries 177 145
BOINC is currently around 55% of total production, where u need to consider that UD agents as single core and BOINC multi-core.

(I take these numbers with a pinch or 2 of salt)

The element which is most reliable, though a mix of CPU time + Wall clock time, summed together as Run-time, is shown in this graph, where the point is, that the CPU's of today are multiple times more powerful of those is past..... inflation corrected, this graph would probably be following a curve similar to the space shuttle.


----------------------------------------
WCG Global & Research > Make Proposal Help: Start Here!
Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All!
[Jun 23, 2007 8:43:56 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread