| Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
 |
World Community Grid Forums
Category: Completed Research
Forum: Human Proteome Folding - Phase 2
Thread: Zero claimd, 134,3 granted |
| No member browsing this thread |
|
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 11
|
|
| Author |
|
|
de030467
Cruncher Joined: Dec 22, 2006 Post Count: 3 Status: Offline |
Hello,
can anybody explain the claim / granted points? lb239_ 00045_ 19-- Valid 04/17/2007 13:18:22 04/17/2007 13:23:32 0.00 0.0 / 134.3 Many greetings Ralf |
||
|
|
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher Joined: Jul 24, 2005 Post Count: 20043 Status: Offline |
Ralf, is it yours? If so are you running Windows 98? If so, it happens and gets queried on these fora every few weeks. The result is for sure valid and the credit is the 'mean' from the remaining quorum. A mighty fine credit i must say. 1000 WCG points for 1 job.
----------------------------------------
WCG
----------------------------------------Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All! [Edit 1 times, last edit by Sekerob at Apr 19, 2007 11:15:27 AM] |
||
|
|
de030467
Cruncher Joined: Dec 22, 2006 Post Count: 3 Status: Offline |
No it's not my result. Thats my:
lb239_ 00045_ 3-- Valid 04/17/2007 13:10:11 04/19/2007 09:48:12 7.47 66.7 / 71.0 Why do I get only 71.0 granted. Ralf |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Only? You claimed 66.7, you got 71. Where's the problem?
|
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Only? You claimed 66.7, you got 71. Where's the problem? If somebody claim 0 and get 134.3 granted why do Ralf need to claim 66.7 to get only 71.0 on the same workunit. May greetings Siegfried |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
The zero is an error in the client. The result was still crunched and returned properly.
You are comparing two different work units. All copies of a single work unit are given the same score (except when one copy overclaims and gets reduced). |
||
|
|
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher Joined: Jul 24, 2005 Post Count: 20043 Status: Offline |
Actually, i smell something faulty here.... it deviates from past on the HPF2. Copy 3 should get same credit as copy 19 (last few digits indicating which one it is in the HPF2 set).
----------------------------------------We've had the algorithm recently changed because of other zero claimer in a quorum 3 situation, but not had one yet in a HPF2 as far as i can recollect....something for knreed or viktors to look at. Can you post the whole quorum please (all 19 or more copies). thanks Added: Before doing copy/past can you hit the 'return time' column header, so it's sorted. The first 15 are the base of the credit.
WCG
----------------------------------------Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All! [Edit 1 times, last edit by Sekerob at Apr 19, 2007 12:31:12 PM] |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
The quorum doctor is:
+----+ |
||
|
|
de030467
Cruncher Joined: Dec 22, 2006 Post Count: 3 Status: Offline |
Here is the list:
Project Name: Human Proteome Folding - Phase 2 Created: 04/16/2007 14:01:04 Name: lb239_00045 Minimum Quorum: 15 Initial Replication: 19 Result Name Status Sent Time Time Due / Return Time CPU Time (hours) Claimed/ Granted BOINC Credit lb239_ 00045_ 20-- Valid 04/18/2007 06:39:24 04/18/2007 21:19:32 10.23 82.4 / 71.0 lb239_ 00045_ 4-- Valid 04/17/2007 14:00:16 04/18/2007 17:11:10 11.19 72.3 / 71.0 lb239_ 00045_ 15-- Error 04/17/2007 13:52:52 04/18/2007 06:38:41 0.00 0.0 / 0.0 lb239_ 00045_ 16-- Valid 04/17/2007 13:31:40 04/18/2007 09:17:04 4.07 63.5 / 71.0 lb239_ 00045_ 10-- Valid 04/17/2007 13:30:29 04/18/2007 08:24:33 12.95 84.4 / 71.0 lb239_ 00045_ 17-- Valid 04/17/2007 13:27:15 04/18/2007 07:24:12 5.37 89.8 / 71.0 lb239_ 00045_ 9-- Valid 04/17/2007 13:24:44 04/18/2007 11:26:26 6.75 71.1 / 71.0 lb239_ 00045_ 2-- Valid 04/17/2007 13:23:58 04/18/2007 19:15:07 8.64 71.2 / 71.0 lb239_ 00045_ 19-- Valid 04/17/2007 13:18:22 04/17/2007 13:23:32 0.00 0.0 / 134.3 lb239_ 00045_ 14-- Valid 04/17/2007 13:13:53 04/19/2007 01:40:01 13.97 75.7 / 71.0 lb239_ 00045_ 7-- In Progress 04/17/2007 13:13:08 04/26/2007 13:13:08 0.00 0.0 / 0.0 lb239_ 00045_ 8-- Valid 04/17/2007 13:10:50 04/18/2007 04:03:45 7.23 68.8 / 71.0 lb239_ 00045_ 3-- Valid 04/17/2007 13:10:11 04/19/2007 09:48:12 7.47 66.7 / 71.0 lb239_ 00045_ 18-- Error 04/17/2007 12:57:01 04/17/2007 13:12:53 0.00 0.0 / 0.0 lb239_ 00045_ 11-- Valid 04/17/2007 12:51:41 04/18/2007 08:40:45 5.26 58.6 / 71.0 lb239_ 00045_ 1-- Valid 04/17/2007 12:49:16 04/18/2007 07:35:45 8.26 69.9 / 71.0 lb239_ 00045_ 13-- Valid 04/17/2007 12:48:43 04/18/2007 15:38:26 6.43 77.8 / 71.0 lb239_ 00045_ 12-- In Progress 04/17/2007 12:48:34 04/26/2007 12:48:34 0.00 0.0 / 0.0 lb239_ 00045_ 5-- Valid 04/17/2007 12:48:07 04/18/2007 01:50:10 5.91 54.2 / 71.0 lb239_ 00045_ 6-- Valid 04/17/2007 12:45:15 04/19/2007 02:00:32 33.40 77.3 / 71.0 lb239_ 00045_ 0-- Valid 04/17/2007 12:44:53 04/18/2007 13:28:40 11.76 72.7 / 71.0 |
||
|
|
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher Joined: Jul 24, 2005 Post Count: 20043 Status: Offline |
Thanks, the 'quorum doctor' will take this to the programmers as it's obvious that something is 'fawlty' with the zero claim adjustment routine.
----------------------------------------
WCG
Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All! |
||
|
|
|