Go here http://www.boincstats.com/
Click on WCG (or others to compare)
Click on Users Overview (it should look like http://www.boincstats.com/stats/project_graph.php?pr=wcg&view=users if you're looking for WCG).

I'm not in the mood to analyze, but there's the data.

Hmmm. On the months view now it looks like we're on a strong increase. Disappointing though to see only 54.2% active users. I suppose these graphs do not account for users on the old UD client, or do they?

even though everyone knows about the product, coca-cola has always done frequent advertising to keep their product in front of people.

so i'm sure it's important to mention wcg whenever you have a chance. at the same time we don't want ibm to do paid advertising or to solicit money.

there may some other approaches such as those late-night tv/cable shows, or public radio, which could be done for free. i guess someone would have to be familiar with how they work

also, coca-cola knows that people want to "win" something. maybe we could give a free computer to the first person/group that finds a certain rare object? i don't know if those lucky people who found the big prime numbers were given any prize.

Nothing missing and you know it:

http://www.worldcommunitygrid.org/forums/wcg/viewthread?thread=18277

The line of your graph is not flat but bend up. Think I pointed that out to you as well. Put a ruler on the 2 ends. It isthus that your statement "amount of number crunching done per day is a straight line" is a misrepresentation of fact.

Furthermore, giving the shift from run time reporting to pure CPU time reporting the actual underlying curve subdued.

Now why you consider me bringing the inverse to the table of that what you produce, the exact same data, as an attack, is something you have to qualify. Your graph has no more value than mine and the medium short and long shows nothing but a perpetual increase of the amount of CPU time contributed by the volunteers.

Sekerob