Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Active  | Guidelines  | Search
 

Quick Go »
No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Active
Total posts in this thread: 5
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 1450 times and has 4 replies Next Thread
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
HPF2 Structure Comparison

As I understand it, both Genome Comparison and BOINC-SIMAP compare proteins based upon sequences.

HPF2's goal is to provide structural data for all sequenced proteins, because structure provides more data. Once a sufficient repository of data for HPF2 is acquired (or HPF2 is finished), will there be a structure-structure comparitive analysis for predicted -> predicted/known protein structures?

Is this a computationally intensive task that would require a new DC project?
----------------------------------------
[Edit 1 times, last edit by Former Member at Feb 2, 2007 6:29:02 PM]
[Feb 2, 2007 6:28:38 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: HPF2 Structure Comparison

Hi esoteric17,
Genome Comparison and SIMAP are comparing proteins using the 1-dimensional sequence to compute similarity. HPF2 is predicting the 3-dimensional structure. There are methods for computing the 'similarity' of 3-D structures, but this gets complicated. A similar 'exterior' is much more important biologically than the interior. I have not heard of anyone wanting to do a massive grand comparison. I suspect that a more targeted investigation will be the usual rule.

Lawrence
[Feb 2, 2007 9:49:17 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: HPF2 Structure Comparison

Hi esoteric17,
Genome Comparison and SIMAP are comparing proteins using the 1-dimensional sequence to compute similarity. HPF2 is predicting the 3-dimensional structure. ....
Lawrence

Let's see if my car (automotive) analogy is correct?
Protein structures are like a car. They all have four wheels, bodies, and doors.
The 1-dimensional similarity is like letting the driver thru the door opening (nothing more) but the 3-dimensional comparison is also watching or letting the driver push the gas pedal and shift the thing, after getting inside?
Lawrence, am I fairly correct here?
[Feb 4, 2007 6:03:42 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Brecht Crombez
Cruncher
Joined: Oct 16, 2006
Post Count: 40
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: HPF2 Structure Comparison

1D means that they compare the sequences of AminoAcids in different proteins
(a protein is a chain of AminoAcids)

3D means that they (also) compare the 'folding' of those AminoAcids-chains
(the chain of AminoAcids is fold into an unique way for each protein, so this is the 3D structure of a protein)

hopefully this is a clear explanation...
greets
[Feb 4, 2007 8:45:09 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: HPF2 Structure Comparison

You have it right, Brecht Crombez!

For most folded proteins, what matters most biologically is the exterior boundary of atoms that it presents to the world for chemical interactions. A change in the interior sequence is important only if it moves the exterior around into a new shape.

Lawrence
[Feb 4, 2007 9:34:07 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread