| Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
| World Community Grid Forums
|
| No member browsing this thread |
|
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 33
|
|
| Author |
|
|
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher Joined: Jul 24, 2005 Post Count: 20043 Status: Offline |
part of the madness comes from pausing a WU for a prolonged period. Start it on day 1 crunch a few hours, do a few hours more the next day, than do the last few on day 3. BOINC will perceive u only crunching 6 hours for that project in 2+ days..... sort of the simplified explanation. It's all designed to ensure that u 'never' end up with a work buffer volume that can not be finished within the schedule. Running 5.8.1 now (not a production approved version) and all was in balance until a 10 CPU hours FA@H came along.
----------------------------------------No, it's not going to keep me awake..... no itches, just letting it do the job.....sooner or later it will fetch new work.... oh and suspending WU's no longer forces new work retrieval in the 5.8.x series. BOINC knows they are there :O
WCG
----------------------------------------Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All! [Edit 1 times, last edit by Sekerob at Jan 8, 2007 9:28:07 AM] |
||
|
|
Phill23
Advanced Cruncher Joined: Jan 3, 2006 Post Count: 59 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Been getting the same thing or something similar...
Had my PC on for over 12 hours yesterday and there was one work unit that even after 11 hours of being on and crunching constantly (this is a X2 4600 @ 2.6Ghz (slight overclock)) and the work unit was still on 0% complete, yet the daft thing was, it was ment to have finished within 2.5 hours! I gave up with it and aborted the work until as everytime I restarted the PC, it lost all that time it was working on.. I thought it was just wasting my CPU time so its now started with other work.. I'll upload the screen shot I got of it before I shortly cancelled the unit... |
||
|
|
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher Joined: Jul 24, 2005 Post Count: 20043 Status: Offline |
Please post the WU name and the device/computer ID or send in email form to 'Contact Us', so the technicians can have a look. What were the results of the others in the quorum for that WU (see Result Status page and click on the WU name).
----------------------------------------plz review your message tab / log file for any entries of the subject WU and post them/mail them too.
WCG
Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All! |
||
|
|
knreed
Former World Community Grid Tech Joined: Nov 8, 2004 Post Count: 4504 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Members should start receiving workunits with more accurate estimated flops within the next day. Please keep in mind that there is still significant variance that we cannot predicate but the changes coming will be an improvement.
|
||
|
|
keithhenry
Ace Cruncher Senile old farts of the world ....uh.....uh..... nevermind Joined: Nov 18, 2004 Post Count: 18667 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Kevin,you aren't kidding!!!
---------------------------------------- TC times on FAAH have dropped by one third and FCG by two-thirds. Now those may go up a little once the previous WU's work out of the queue. |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Hi,
maybe i am too early with this post and things will smoothen out, but ought i just let you know. I am running 3 machines for FCG only, and found that starting yesterday the TC dropped considerably (for all 3 machines now < 1hour, while this was usually in between 2 - 4 hours). However, running the first WU out of this series (with TC before start of 46:49), is now after 59:00 on 35.9 % leaving a TC of 57:13..... As a result of receiving WUs with a lower TC, i now have > 60 WUs in queue where my connect-settings are on 2.0 (days). In my case with 24 x 7 running machines i will probably make all those WUs before the deadline, but i am sure that this does not count for everyone that experiences the above. Gerard. |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Nothing to worry about: this is a predictable consequence of adjusting the estimates. It will normalise quickly.
|
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Nothing to worry about: this is a predictable consequence of adjusting the estimates. It will normalise quickly. OK, i´ll wait and see ![]() Gerard |
||
|
|
keithhenry
Ace Cruncher Senile old farts of the world ....uh.....uh..... nevermind Joined: Nov 18, 2004 Post Count: 18667 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Yep, I noticed that too. My TC times have doubled since my last post. I presumed that was some sort of consequence of the change and I figured I'd wait until the pre-change WUs are out of my queue to see how things look then. As it is, the post-change WUs have TCs that appear to be much more accurate.
---------------------------------------- |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Hope I am not off topic here…
I have also notice that the FAAH WU times were all over the place. My question is why BOINC does not abort a WU that is going to miss the due time? Thanks, dbmms |
||
|
|
|