| Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
| World Community Grid Forums
|
| No member browsing this thread |
|
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 7
|
|
| Author |
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
We broke 70 thousand CPU years today. Good work all!
|
||
|
|
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher Joined: Jul 24, 2005 Post Count: 20043 Status: Offline |
U beat us all to it geopsychic.... the fastest 10,000 CPU years ever and for posterity.... just 47 days since October 17, 2006. The global stats reporting the moment of recording at 06:00 UTC January 2, 2007
---------------------------------------- :Totals: Achievement Summary: 10,000 CPU Years May 23, 2005 20,000 CPU Years Nov.14, 2005 30,000 CPU Years Feb.10, 2006 40,000 CPU Years May 02, 2006 50,000 CPU Years July 15, 2006 60,000 CPU Years Oct.17, 2006 70,000 CPU Years Jan.02, 2007 ![]()
WCG
----------------------------------------Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All! [Edit 1 times, last edit by Sekerob at Jan 2, 2007 11:05:36 AM] |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
The fastest 10,000 years for the WCG or the fastest 10,000 years for any grid project??
|
||
|
|
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher Joined: Jul 24, 2005 Post Count: 20043 Status: Offline |
Never attempted to look up the CPU time cumulatives of other projects. But for Grid.org **, I'm not aware anyone else keeps track of that at either individual or overall level. BUT, one can derive.....
----------------------------------------So happened to look and post about the WCG share where we hold 7th Spot @ Global BOINCstats. We get only 5% of the output (in credit terms) and less than 10% of the SETI project alone. Considering that BOINC is like 20% of the total WCG (80% UD Agent), one can conclude that 5x<10% is still less then half of SETI. If others know how to come up with better approximation, feel free :) cheers ** WCG far exceeds Grid.org in reported CPU time, where the latters is pure wallclock time, whereas WCG is a mix of wall- and CPU clock time.
WCG
----------------------------------------Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All! [Edit 1 times, last edit by Sekerob at Jan 6, 2007 9:29:51 AM] |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
What is the next milestone? 500,000 machines?
|
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Here is a URL I keep in my favorites. It shows the daily number of computer hours divided by 24: http://vspx27.stanford.edu/DCcomparison.html
|
||
|
|
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher Joined: Jul 24, 2005 Post Count: 20043 Status: Offline |
Sorry Lawrence, but moved that url to the 'old links' folder. The Client count reported there bares no relation to the active clients on any given day as it simply translates the number of total 24 hour CPU days for WCG to active PCs at 1:1. United devices (Grid.org), has substantially less CPU time (theirs purely wall-clock), yet reports more active devices..... makes no sense.
----------------------------------------Accurate or not, BOINCstats , for the portion of clients(hosts) that run that agent reported yesterday 28 thousand active hosts. Extrapolated from the share on total production my best guess is probably 80-90 thousand active devices any given day. Leaves the aritrary 'registered devices' at WCG. This week or early next week we could hit the 500,000th registration. With 250,000 members thats 2 : 1....and physically i got 3, but got about 15 historically accumulated due re-installs and involuntary forced re-registrations ;>| Anyway, the active clients number is on the list of items to add to the statistics pages to be revamped.....2007 we hope.
WCG
Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All! |
||
|
|
|