Force10 Interface Stats problem

Post general support questions here that do not specifically fall into the Linux or Windows categories.

Moderators: Developers, Moderators

Post Reply
aarc51
Posts: 8
Joined: Wed Jul 22, 2009 11:43 am

Force10 Interface Stats problem

Post by aarc51 »

I'm new to Cacti so excuse the ignorance. I'm succesfully graphing a number of interfaces on Cisco devices but I'm unable to graph Force10 interfaces.

Also, the Data Query results for Force10 look weird:

Image

When Cisco looks like this:

Image

Here's a debug of the attempted graphing:

Code: Select all

RRDTool Command:

f:/rrdtool/rrdtool.exe graph - \
--imgformat=PNG \
--start=-86400 \
--end=-300 \
--title="cc2rt3a - Traffic - TenGigabitEther/33882171" \
--base=1000 \
--height=120 \
--width=500 \
--alt-autoscale-max \
--lower-limit=0 \
--vertical-label="bits per second" \
--slope-mode \
--font TITLE:12: \
--font AXIS:8: \
--font LEGEND:10: \
--font UNIT:8: \
DEF:a="F\:/wwwroot/cacti/rra/cc2rt3a_traffic_in_104.rrd":traffic_in:AVERAGE \
DEF:b="F\:/wwwroot/cacti/rra/cc2rt3a_traffic_in_104.rrd":traffic_out:AVERAGE \
CDEF:cdefa=a,8,* \
CDEF:cdefe=b,-8,* \
CDEF:cdeff=b,8,* \
AREA:cdefa#002A97FF:"Inbound"  \
GPRINT:cdefa:LAST:" Last\:%8.2lf %s"  \
GPRINT:cdefa:AVERAGE:"Avg\:%8.2lf %s"  \
GPRINT:cdefa:MAX:"Max\:%8.2lf %s\n"  \
AREA:cdefe#B90054FF:"Outbound"  \
GPRINT:cdeff:LAST:"Last\:%8.2lf %s"  \
GPRINT:cdeff:AVERAGE:"Avg\:%8.2lf %s"  \
GPRINT:cdeff:MAX:"Max\:%8.2lf %s\n"  \
 \
HRULE:0#B90054FF:""  \
HRULE:0#FF0000FF:""  \
COMMENT:"Graph Last Updated\:Wed 22 Jul 10\:10\:00 MDT 2009"  \
VRULE:00#9FA4EEFF:"" 

RRDTool Says:

ERROR: opening 'F:/wwwroot/cacti/rra/cc2rt3a_traffic_in_104.rrd': No such file or directory
^ I don't get this error when graphing Cisco devices...
Last edited by aarc51 on Wed Jul 22, 2009 4:43 pm, edited 3 times in total.
User avatar
BSOD2600
Cacti Moderator
Posts: 12171
Joined: Sat May 08, 2004 12:44 pm
Location: USA

Post by BSOD2600 »

Does the Force10 really have hundreds of interfaces?

Post the verbose query of the snmp interface -- either from cacti or an snmpwalk against the Force10.

Also useful to follow: http://docs.cacti.net/manual:087:4_help ... #debugging
aarc51
Posts: 8
Joined: Wed Jul 22, 2009 11:43 am

Post by aarc51 »

Yeah it has 998 interfaces. Verbose query returns a blank page. The CPU doesn't seem to go over 30% during the query though. Maybe there's just too many interfaces for Cacti to handle?
aarc51
Posts: 8
Joined: Wed Jul 22, 2009 11:43 am

Post by aarc51 »

Looks like it's graphing the CPU fine on the Force10:

Image

Working on the SNMP walk and debugging...
aarc51
Posts: 8
Joined: Wed Jul 22, 2009 11:43 am

Post by aarc51 »

So I walked the device and everything appears to be in there properly - including the ifAliases that aren't appearing in my screen shot.
aarc51
Posts: 8
Joined: Wed Jul 22, 2009 11:43 am

Post by aarc51 »

It's definitely related to the amount of ports I'm adding. I just added a Force10 E600, which has considerably less port density, and was able to graph ports without issue.

I misspoke earlier, the device has 1,178 ports - not 998.
aarc51
Posts: 8
Joined: Wed Jul 22, 2009 11:43 am

Post by aarc51 »

After reading leoutskot's sticky, http://forums.cacti.net/viewtopic.php?t=10396 , I decided to try SNMPV2 and it Cacti was able to index the device properly.
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest