Cacti showing inaccurate values
Moderators: Developers, Moderators
-
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Fri Jul 25, 2008 1:19 am
Cacti showing inaccurate values
Hello.
The company I'm currently working on is at this moment using PRTG to monitor the network with graphs.
However, after setting up Cacti we noticed that PRTG and Cacti is showing different values from the same devices.
I've tried to zoom in to the cactigraph to make it compareable to the one from PRTG.
(If you can explain the graphgaps, that would be awesome too;).)
Any idea how this can be so different?
It has to be said that the cactibox is running cactiez 0.4 on a desktop pc and prtg on a w2k3 server.
Hoping for replies
//GD
The company I'm currently working on is at this moment using PRTG to monitor the network with graphs.
However, after setting up Cacti we noticed that PRTG and Cacti is showing different values from the same devices.
I've tried to zoom in to the cactigraph to make it compareable to the one from PRTG.
(If you can explain the graphgaps, that would be awesome too;).)
Any idea how this can be so different?
It has to be said that the cactibox is running cactiez 0.4 on a desktop pc and prtg on a w2k3 server.
Hoping for replies
//GD
- Attachments
-
- Graph from Cacti
- graph_cacti.PNG (35.23 KiB) Viewed 2935 times
-
- Graph from PRTG
- graph_prtg.png (4.99 KiB) Viewed 2935 times
-
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Fri Jul 25, 2008 1:19 am
Yes it does, but I noticed something new:
The problem accure only on high bandwidth use, like over 400Mbit/s.
This night we had a peak (used SNMP v2 instead of v1) and after the peak there was a fall down to alot lower values, please see the new attached picture.
Even tho the useage of the link was above 800Mbit/s for hours it doesnt show on the graphs.
We measured the local interface on the server and it is compareable to the PRTG version, not cacti.
The problem accure only on high bandwidth use, like over 400Mbit/s.
This night we had a peak (used SNMP v2 instead of v1) and after the peak there was a fall down to alot lower values, please see the new attached picture.
Even tho the useage of the link was above 800Mbit/s for hours it doesnt show on the graphs.
We measured the local interface on the server and it is compareable to the PRTG version, not cacti.
- Attachments
-
- peak.PNG (27.28 KiB) Viewed 2849 times
-
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Fri Jul 25, 2008 1:19 am
Its already at 1000 000 000, should be enough for gigabit interface, right?
1000000000 bit = 953.674316406 megabit
According to http://www.translatorscafe.com/cafe/uni ... o-megabit/.
However I increased it to 100 000 000 000 (hundred billions) to see if theres a change.
1000000000 bit = 953.674316406 megabit
According to http://www.translatorscafe.com/cafe/uni ... o-megabit/.
However I increased it to 100 000 000 000 (hundred billions) to see if theres a change.
Last edited by General_Dark on Fri Aug 15, 2008 12:58 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Fri Jul 25, 2008 1:19 am
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests