Cacti showing inaccurate values

Post general support questions here that do not specifically fall into the Linux or Windows categories.

Moderators: Developers, Moderators

Post Reply
General_Dark
Posts: 6
Joined: Fri Jul 25, 2008 1:19 am

Cacti showing inaccurate values

Post by General_Dark »

Hello.
The company I'm currently working on is at this moment using PRTG to monitor the network with graphs.
However, after setting up Cacti we noticed that PRTG and Cacti is showing different values from the same devices.
I've tried to zoom in to the cactigraph to make it compareable to the one from PRTG.
(If you can explain the graphgaps, that would be awesome too;).)
Any idea how this can be so different?
It has to be said that the cactibox is running cactiez 0.4 on a desktop pc and prtg on a w2k3 server.
Hoping for replies
//GD
Attachments
Graph from Cacti
Graph from Cacti
graph_cacti.PNG (35.23 KiB) Viewed 2887 times
Graph from PRTG
Graph from PRTG
graph_prtg.png (4.99 KiB) Viewed 2887 times
User avatar
gandalf
Developer
Posts: 22383
Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2004 2:46 am
Location: Muenster, Germany
Contact:

Post by gandalf »

I don't know what's underneath the PRTG.
Does this occur even on graphs showing data of last day?
Reinhard
General_Dark
Posts: 6
Joined: Fri Jul 25, 2008 1:19 am

Post by General_Dark »

Yes it does, but I noticed something new:

The problem accure only on high bandwidth use, like over 400Mbit/s.
This night we had a peak (used SNMP v2 instead of v1) and after the peak there was a fall down to alot lower values, please see the new attached picture.
Even tho the useage of the link was above 800Mbit/s for hours it doesnt show on the graphs.
We measured the local interface on the server and it is compareable to the PRTG version, not cacti.
Attachments
peak.PNG
peak.PNG (27.28 KiB) Viewed 2801 times
User avatar
gandalf
Developer
Posts: 22383
Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2004 2:46 am
Location: Muenster, Germany
Contact:

Post by gandalf »

Please find the MAX setting of the rrd file's data source. If it's too low, it may clip off data
Reinhard
General_Dark
Posts: 6
Joined: Fri Jul 25, 2008 1:19 am

Post by General_Dark »

Its already at 1000 000 000, should be enough for gigabit interface, right?
1000000000 bit = 953.674316406 megabit
According to http://www.translatorscafe.com/cafe/uni ... o-megabit/.
However I increased it to 100 000 000 000 (hundred billions) to see if theres a change.
Last edited by General_Dark on Fri Aug 15, 2008 12:58 am, edited 1 time in total.
General_Dark
Posts: 6
Joined: Fri Jul 25, 2008 1:19 am

Post by General_Dark »

I did adjust the max value, but there's still no change.
Any ideas?
General_Dark
Posts: 6
Joined: Fri Jul 25, 2008 1:19 am

Post by General_Dark »

Shameless bumping in hope for an update?
punctt
Posts: 6
Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2008 4:39 am
Location: Istanbul

Post by punctt »

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests