Warning: Missing argument 9 for cacti_snmp_walk(), called in /usr/share/cacti/plugins/tools/tools.php on line 120 and defined in /usr/share/cacti/lib/snmp.php on line 225
Warning: Missing argument 10 for cacti_snmp_walk(), called in /usr/share/cacti/plugins/tools/tools.php on line 120 and defined in /usr/share/cacti/lib/snmp.php on line 225
SNMP walk doesn't work on tools plugin
Moderators: Developers, Moderators
SNMP walk doesn't work on tools plugin
When typing a device IP and using SNMP walk, it shows:
- gandalf
- Developer
- Posts: 22383
- Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2004 2:46 am
- Location: Muenster, Germany
- Contact:
I suppose the plugin is not (yet) cacti087 compatible.
cacti087 brought full SNMP V3 support. For that very reason,we decided to change the procedure call for the internal cacti functions cacti_snmp_walk|get. They now need some more parameters for passing SNMP V3 stuff. As these are internal functions, no APIs, this _should_ do no harm.
Well, now we know better. Many people decided to use those functions with scripts and/or plugins.
All those authors will have to apply some changes to the functions calls to make them 087 aware. In general, it's an easy task, but it is left to those authors.
In fact, it is not NECESSARY to make those stuff SNMP V3 compliant (which would be the best approach); simply providing empty parameters would be a first step.
HTH
Reinhard
cacti087 brought full SNMP V3 support. For that very reason,we decided to change the procedure call for the internal cacti functions cacti_snmp_walk|get. They now need some more parameters for passing SNMP V3 stuff. As these are internal functions, no APIs, this _should_ do no harm.
Well, now we know better. Many people decided to use those functions with scripts and/or plugins.
All those authors will have to apply some changes to the functions calls to make them 087 aware. In general, it's an easy task, but it is left to those authors.
In fact, it is not NECESSARY to make those stuff SNMP V3 compliant (which would be the best approach); simply providing empty parameters would be a first step.
HTH
Reinhard
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest