I have setup for 1 min polling, and sometimes it would keep going over one minute.
Then it would mysteriously go away.
Other that yum updates, this box is not messed around with.
Has anyone else seen this relationship to disk writes?
I am running a CactiEZ install with 0.8.6h. (thanks jimmy)
The hareware is an IBM blade 2 Xenon 4 gig ram, writing to raid 1 scsi drive
Time:33.4140 Method:cactid Processes:4 Threads:60 Hosts:278 HostsPerProcess:70 DataSources:12485 RRDsProcessed:5291
[/img]
poller time follows disk i/o
Moderators: Developers, Moderators
poller time follows disk i/o
- Attachments
-
- disk i-o
- disk-i-o.png (45.9 KiB) Viewed 1937 times
-
- poller time
- pollertime.png (45.13 KiB) Viewed 1937 times
I have been using this server since the summer.
When the polling issue first happened (I was not polling local disks), I started yelling at the guys that manage the blade center, then it went away.
It came back again , then I thought I had too many rrds. It wasn't until I was quickly scrolling through the monthly graphs that I saw a pattern.
The tan colour is disk writes, what could make a two week cycle?
This server has been rebooted numerous times within the time span with no affect (effect?) on the polling or disk writes.
When the polling issue first happened (I was not polling local disks), I started yelling at the guys that manage the blade center, then it went away.
It came back again , then I thought I had too many rrds. It wasn't until I was quickly scrolling through the monthly graphs that I saw a pattern.
The tan colour is disk writes, what could make a two week cycle?
This server has been rebooted numerous times within the time span with no affect (effect?) on the polling or disk writes.
My lunch is starting to wear off, so I will wait until Monday.
I am thinking of doing a clean rebuild of 0.8.6j with a raid 0 to squeeze a little more out of the hard drives. If I can b*tch into getting space on the fibre channel SAN, could that be a better place to put the mysql database?
The more people that see (understand) the value, the more switches and servers get added.
I commend your dedication and support, mrtg and now cacti has been such a useful tool to explain to users how their network and servers are behaving (or mis-behaving)
I am thinking of doing a clean rebuild of 0.8.6j with a raid 0 to squeeze a little more out of the hard drives. If I can b*tch into getting space on the fibre channel SAN, could that be a better place to put the mysql database?
The more people that see (understand) the value, the more switches and servers get added.
I commend your dedication and support, mrtg and now cacti has been such a useful tool to explain to users how their network and servers are behaving (or mis-behaving)
- gandalf
- Developer
- Posts: 22383
- Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2004 2:46 am
- Location: Muenster, Germany
- Contact:
Best practise is to put rrd files on the fastest disks (write speed matters). Until now, I've not heard of issues related to mysql performance. But you may google the forums for some (few) hints on tuning mysql. Apart from mysql connections, I'm sticking to standard RHEL settings.
But if there are other applications running in parallel, things may change
Reinhard
But if there are other applications running in parallel, things may change
Reinhard
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests