STACK doesn't work when the stack has too many items
Moderators: Developers, Moderators
You would need to read the whole thread for all the context -- but I'll summarize.
1) it's graphing fine now. All of this is a nice-to-have.
2) the requirement to put in a value for upper and lower limit in the web interface is weird, if importing a template without them doesn't also fail. (And it doesn't.)
3) after entering a required value for upper_limit in the web interface, it's weird not to see it in --upper-limit in the rrdtool command line. Why was it required if it's not used?
But nothing here is keeping me from sleeping at night
1) it's graphing fine now. All of this is a nice-to-have.
2) the requirement to put in a value for upper and lower limit in the web interface is weird, if importing a template without them doesn't also fail. (And it doesn't.)
3) after entering a required value for upper_limit in the web interface, it's weird not to see it in --upper-limit in the rrdtool command line. Why was it required if it's not used?
But nothing here is keeping me from sleeping at night
- gandalf
- Developer
- Posts: 22383
- Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2004 2:46 am
- Location: Muenster, Germany
- Contact:
You are correct. My average time to read and reply to a post is 1-2 minutes.xaprb wrote:You would need to read the whole thread for all the context -- but I'll summarize.
This is what i meant by "ugly backward compatibility". Perhaps I'll have to rethink to get rid of it. The first time I tried it was a nogo3) after entering a required value for upper_limit in the web interface, it's weird not to see it in --upper-limit in the rrdtool command line. Why was it required if it's not used?
Why does this make me happyBut nothing here is keeping me from sleeping at night
Reinhard
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: marachcr and 0 guests