Ad blocker detected: Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors. Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker on our website.
I did not yet receive response to my internal question. And I won't fix it just based on my knowledge. It "may" break the way other people read cacti graphs (even if I suppose it's the correct way doing things)
Reinhard
The related bug is now assigned to me.
Solution will be to keep old behaviour but to add dropdown selections to "do it correctly". Not sure if it will make it into 087c. But at least 088 will be fine
Reinhard
Was there ever a fix for this? I have weekly/monthly/yearly graphs that don't really represent the peak throughput of interfaces and would really like a fix!
You said this issue was fixed in c, and i've now setup a fully patched version of 0.8.7d and i'm seeing exactly the same behavior! Data is still averaging HEAVILY over time and not representing true peaks. Is there some setting I need to change? See attachment for an explanation.
What's even more confusing is the yearly average before and after the upgrade. The first graph on the attachment is running 0.8.7b and the second is the same graph in 0.8.7d
The data in the first is correct but it simply didn't display those peaks, whereas the data in the second is averaged off to match the incorrect graphing of the peaks!