95th Percentile not displaying after upgrade>0.8.6i
Moderators: Developers, Moderators
-
kwabbernoot
- Cacti User
- Posts: 99
- Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2003 4:11 am
- Location: Zottegem, Belgium
Hi,
I can confirm, created 2 95th percentile graphs on my Cacti 0.8.6i test environment and both graphs do not show up.
When I debug the graph Cacti shows the RRD syntax, but "RRDTOOL Says" -> Nothing
The graphs are displayed when I add the ":2" like specified in the previous posts. I created a bug report.
I can confirm, created 2 95th percentile graphs on my Cacti 0.8.6i test environment and both graphs do not show up.
When I debug the graph Cacti shows the RRD syntax, but "RRDTOOL Says" -> Nothing
The graphs are displayed when I add the ":2" like specified in the previous posts. I created a bug report.
Regards,
Kwabbernoot
OS : [b]Slackware 10.2.0[/b]
Cacti : [b]0.8.6j[/b]
Cactid : [b]0.8.6j[/b]
Apache : [b]1.3.34[/b]
PHP : [b]5.1.4[/b]
MySQL : [b]4.1.21[/b]
RRDTool : [b]1.2.12[/b]
Net-SNMP : [b]5.3.0[/b]
Kwabbernoot
OS : [b]Slackware 10.2.0[/b]
Cacti : [b]0.8.6j[/b]
Cactid : [b]0.8.6j[/b]
Apache : [b]1.3.34[/b]
PHP : [b]5.1.4[/b]
MySQL : [b]4.1.21[/b]
RRDTool : [b]1.2.12[/b]
Net-SNMP : [b]5.3.0[/b]
-
rony
- Developer/Forum Admin
- Posts: 6022
- Joined: Mon Nov 17, 2003 6:35 pm
- Location: Michigan, USA
- Contact:
I will be honest, I had to go back and really look at this issue.
There was a change made to the code, and it was to fix a minor bug. A bug that did not make it required to have the ":2" at the end of the variable. Unfortunatly, even if you had ":2" or ":3" at the end, it always defaulted to a value of "2".
This was silently "fixed" by me and not put in the change log....
I will talk to Ian about potientially reversing the change and or updating the documentation to reflect the requirement of this field.
There was a change made to the code, and it was to fix a minor bug. A bug that did not make it required to have the ":2" at the end of the variable. Unfortunatly, even if you had ":2" or ":3" at the end, it always defaulted to a value of "2".
This was silently "fixed" by me and not put in the change log....
I will talk to Ian about potientially reversing the change and or updating the documentation to reflect the requirement of this field.
[size=117][i][b]Tony Roman[/b][/i][/size]
[size=84][i]Experience is what causes a person to make new mistakes instead of old ones.[/i][/size]
[size=84][i]There are only 3 way to complete a project: Good, Fast or Cheap, pick two.[/i][/size]
[size=84][i]With age comes wisdom, what you choose to do with it determines whether or not you are wise.[/i][/size]
[size=84][i]Experience is what causes a person to make new mistakes instead of old ones.[/i][/size]
[size=84][i]There are only 3 way to complete a project: Good, Fast or Cheap, pick two.[/i][/size]
[size=84][i]With age comes wisdom, what you choose to do with it determines whether or not you are wise.[/i][/size]
Nice to hear, anyhow we fixed it in the meanwhile in the template, i have attached the right version which should work.rony wrote:I will be honest, I had to go back and really look at this issue.
There was a change made to the code, and it was to fix a minor bug. A bug that did not make it required to have the ":2" at the end of the variable. Unfortunatly, even if you had ":2" or ":3" at the end, it always defaulted to a value of "2".
This was silently "fixed" by me and not put in the change log....
I will talk to Ian about potientially reversing the change and or updating the documentation to reflect the requirement of this field.
- Attachments
-
- cacti_graph_template_interface_traffic_bitssec_95th_percentile_total_bandwith.xml
- (20.55 KiB) Downloaded 470 times
95th percentile graph also gone after upgrade to 0.8.6j
I also experienced the 95th Percentile graphs going away after a Cacti upgrade. We are attempting to upgrade from 0.8.6g to 0.8.6j. Are there any other clues to fix this problem?
Most of our graphs are using the 95th Percentile template and no longer display. This is also true for any new 95th Percentile graphs (they do not display). Graphs using other templates continue to work just fine (existing and new).
I re-imported the 95th Percentile XML template from the Forum without fixing the problem:
http://forums.cacti.net/viewtopic.php?t ... c&start=30
We are running the following configuration:
SLES9 SP3
php4 4.3.4-43.46.3
mySQL 4.0.18-32.20
rrdtool 1.0.49-1.dag
Is there a fix available for this problem?
Thank you!
Most of our graphs are using the 95th Percentile template and no longer display. This is also true for any new 95th Percentile graphs (they do not display). Graphs using other templates continue to work just fine (existing and new).
I re-imported the 95th Percentile XML template from the Forum without fixing the problem:
http://forums.cacti.net/viewtopic.php?t ... c&start=30
We are running the following configuration:
SLES9 SP3
php4 4.3.4-43.46.3
mySQL 4.0.18-32.20
rrdtool 1.0.49-1.dag
Is there a fix available for this problem?
Thank you!
Update: 3 graph templates not displaying with 0.8.6j upgrade
After further testing, graphs using the following templates are not displayed after upgrade from 0.8.6g to 0.8.6j:
o Traffic (bits/sec, 95th Percentile, Total Bandwidth)
o Traffic (bits/sec, Total Bandwidth)
o Traffic (bytes/sec, Total Bandwidth)
Also, I have already applied the 3 patches identified for 0.8.6j:
o SNMP Ping Method Faulty for PHP Version 4.x
o Tree View Console Missing Hosts
o Problems Displaying RRDtool Graph Thumbnails
(See previous post for more information)
Any suggestions will be welcomed!
o Traffic (bits/sec, 95th Percentile, Total Bandwidth)
o Traffic (bits/sec, Total Bandwidth)
o Traffic (bytes/sec, Total Bandwidth)
Also, I have already applied the 3 patches identified for 0.8.6j:
o SNMP Ping Method Faulty for PHP Version 4.x
o Tree View Console Missing Hosts
o Problems Displaying RRDtool Graph Thumbnails
(See previous post for more information)
Any suggestions will be welcomed!
Solution: Fix thumbnail_graphs_not_working.patch file
As described in recent post, changed apparent typo in lib/rrd.php:
http://forums.cacti.net/viewtopic.php?p=92016
After changing $command_string to $comment_string in the thumbnail_graphs_not_working.patch file for lib/rrd.php, all graphs are displaying properly again.
http://forums.cacti.net/viewtopic.php?p=92016
After changing $command_string to $comment_string in the thumbnail_graphs_not_working.patch file for lib/rrd.php, all graphs are displaying properly again.
-
TheWitness
- Developer
- Posts: 17047
- Joined: Tue May 14, 2002 5:08 pm
- Location: MI, USA
- Contact:
All I can say is CRAP!
TheWitness
TheWitness
True understanding begins only when we realize how little we truly understand...
Life is an adventure, let yours begin with Cacti!
Author of dozens of Cacti plugins and customization's. Advocate of LAMP, MariaDB, IBM Spectrum LSF and the world of batch. Creator of IBM Spectrum RTM, author of quite a bit of unpublished work and most of Cacti's bugs.
_________________
Official Cacti Documentation
GitHub Repository with Supported Plugins
Percona Device Packages (no support)
Interesting Device Packages
For those wondering, I'm still here, but lost in the shadows. Yearning for less bugs. Who want's a Cacti 1.3/2.0? Streams anyone?
Life is an adventure, let yours begin with Cacti!
Author of dozens of Cacti plugins and customization's. Advocate of LAMP, MariaDB, IBM Spectrum LSF and the world of batch. Creator of IBM Spectrum RTM, author of quite a bit of unpublished work and most of Cacti's bugs.
_________________
Official Cacti Documentation
GitHub Repository with Supported Plugins
Percona Device Packages (no support)
Interesting Device Packages
For those wondering, I'm still here, but lost in the shadows. Yearning for less bugs. Who want's a Cacti 1.3/2.0? Streams anyone?
-
TheWitness
- Developer
- Posts: 17047
- Joined: Tue May 14, 2002 5:08 pm
- Location: MI, USA
- Contact:
Ok, I decided to speak more. Thanks for the catch. I admit, I don't QA this stuff enough. I sent a note to Ian to revise the patch to remove my offeding mod.
Larry
Larry
True understanding begins only when we realize how little we truly understand...
Life is an adventure, let yours begin with Cacti!
Author of dozens of Cacti plugins and customization's. Advocate of LAMP, MariaDB, IBM Spectrum LSF and the world of batch. Creator of IBM Spectrum RTM, author of quite a bit of unpublished work and most of Cacti's bugs.
_________________
Official Cacti Documentation
GitHub Repository with Supported Plugins
Percona Device Packages (no support)
Interesting Device Packages
For those wondering, I'm still here, but lost in the shadows. Yearning for less bugs. Who want's a Cacti 1.3/2.0? Streams anyone?
Life is an adventure, let yours begin with Cacti!
Author of dozens of Cacti plugins and customization's. Advocate of LAMP, MariaDB, IBM Spectrum LSF and the world of batch. Creator of IBM Spectrum RTM, author of quite a bit of unpublished work and most of Cacti's bugs.
_________________
Official Cacti Documentation
GitHub Repository with Supported Plugins
Percona Device Packages (no support)
Interesting Device Packages
For those wondering, I'm still here, but lost in the shadows. Yearning for less bugs. Who want's a Cacti 1.3/2.0? Streams anyone?
Thanks to savagemindz for finding the problem
I am just happy to resolve the problem as we are planning to release the new version tomorrow. Now, I just need to put it in an RPM.
It would be great to have the patch file updated so other people do not have the same issue.
It would be great to have the patch file updated so other people do not have the same issue.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest