Multi CPU Utilization Graph

Templates, scripts for templates, scripts and requests for templates.

Moderators: Developers, Moderators

Post Reply
argon0
Cacti User
Posts: 460
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2004 1:22 pm

Post by argon0 »

Hmm, the XML doesn't seem to be easily Human parsable (I thought it might be).

I've attached a new export of the template, try this one.
Attachments
cacti_graph_template_multi_cpu_utilization_on_8_processor_box_1.xml
(34.89 KiB) Downloaded 1847 times
No longer a n00by, probably, by now an 0ldby

Now Head of Technology at RSCH, back to the prickly subject of Monitorring....
joshm
Cacti User
Posts: 82
Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 1:34 pm
Location: STL

Post by joshm »

Ok this one still prompts for the data input like the other one. But now it defaults to not selecting any of that processors where before it had the first 4 selected.(although they were not the right data sources)

Then I tried to select all the right data sources and it would not save what I had selected. So all the data sources show none.

RRDTool Command:

n:/rrdtool/rrdtool.exe graph - \
--imgformat=PNG \
--start=-86400 \
--end=-300 \
--title="Multi CPU Utilization on AlphaSQL (SQL3)" \
--base=1000 \
--height=120 \
--width=500 \
--alt-autoscale-max \
--lower-limit=0 \
--vertical-label="" \
--slope-mode \
--font TITLE:10:c:/winnt/fonts/timesbd.ttf \
--font AXIS:9:c:/winnt/fonts/arial.ttf \
--font LEGEND:11:c:/winnt/fonts/arial.ttf \
--font UNIT:9:c:/winnt/fonts/arial.ttf \
DEF:a="N\:/cacti/rra/alphasql_sql3_cpu0_744.rrd":cpu0:AVERAGE \
DEF:b="N\:/cacti/rra/alphasql_sql3_cpu1_745.rrd":cpu1:AVERAGE \
DEF:c="N\:/cacti/rra/alphasql_sql3_cpu2_746.rrd":cpu2:AVERAGE \
DEF:d="N\:/cacti/rra/alphasql_sql3_cpu3_747.rrd":cpu3:AVERAGE \
DEF:e="N\:/cacti/rra/alphasql_sql3_cpu_748.rrd":cpu:AVERAGE \
DEF:f="N\:/cacti/rra/alphasql_sql3_cpu_748.rrd":cpu:AVERAGE \
DEF:g="N\:/cacti/rra/alphasql_sql3_cpu_748.rrd":cpu:AVERAGE \
DEF:h="N\:/cacti/rra/alphasql_sql3_cpu_748.rrd":cpu:AVERAGE \
CDEF:cdefa=a,b,+,c,+,d,+,e,+,f,+,g,+,h,+,5,/ \
AREA:cdefa#F9FD5F:"Mean CPU\:" \
GPRINT:cdefa:LAST:"Current\:%8.2lf %%" \
GPRINT:cdefa:MIN:"Min\:%8.2lf %%" \
GPRINT:cdefa:MAX:"Max\:%8.2lf %%\n" \
LINE1:a#0000FF:"CPU0\:" \
GPRINT:a:LAST:" Current\:%8.2lf %%" \
GPRINT:a:MIN:"Min\:%8.2lf %%" \
GPRINT:a:MAX:"Max\:%8.2lf %%\n" \
LINE1:b#00A348:"CPU1\:" \
GPRINT:b:LAST:" Current\:%8.2lf %%" \
GPRINT:b:MIN:"Min\:%8.2lf %%" \
GPRINT:b:MAX:"Max\:%8.2lf %%\n" \
LINE1:c#C4FD3D:"CPU2\:" \
GPRINT:c:AVERAGE:" Current\:%8.2lf %%" \
GPRINT:c:MIN:"Min\:%8.2lf %%" \
GPRINT:c:MAX:"Max\:%8.2lf %%\n" \
LINE1:d#FF0000:"CPU3\:" \
GPRINT:d:AVERAGE:" Current\:%8.2lf %%" \
GPRINT:d:MIN:"Min\:%8.2lf %%" \
GPRINT:d:MAX:"Max\:%8.2lf %%\n" \
LINE1:h#000000:"CPU4\:" \
GPRINT:h:LAST:" Current\:%8.2lf %%" \
GPRINT:h:MIN:"Min\:%8.2lf %%" \
GPRINT:h:MAX:"Max\:%8.2lf %%\n" \
LINE1:h#00BED9:"CPU5\:" \
GPRINT:h:LAST:" Current\:%8.2lf %%" \
GPRINT:h:MIN:"Min\:%8.2lf %%" \
GPRINT:h:MAX:"Max\:%8.2lf %%\n" \
LINE1:h#FF00FF:"CPU6\:" \
GPRINT:h:LAST:" Current\:%8.2lf %%" \
GPRINT:h:MIN:"Min\:%8.2lf %%" \
GPRINT:h:MAX:"Max\:%8.2lf %%\n" \
LINE1:h#AAABA1:"CPU7\:" \
GPRINT:h:LAST:" Current\:%8.2lf %%" \
GPRINT:h:AVERAGE:"Min\:%8.2lf %%" \
GPRINT:h:MAX:"Max\:%8.2lf %%"

RRDTool Says:

ERROR: opening 'N:/cacti/rra/alphasql_sql3_cpu0_744.rrd': No such file or directory
argon0
Cacti User
Posts: 460
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2004 1:22 pm

Post by argon0 »

Arse just noticed an error in the cded, it divides by 5 not 8!

I'm off for a couple of days, so will try and fix it on my return, however if you wait a bit and try selecting the data sources again, it should still work, the other graphs need to create the data sources before this graph cab use them.
No longer a n00by, probably, by now an 0ldby

Now Head of Technology at RSCH, back to the prickly subject of Monitorring....
joshm
Cacti User
Posts: 82
Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 1:34 pm
Location: STL

Post by joshm »

argon0 wrote:Arse just noticed an error in the cded, it divides by 5 not 8!

I'm off for a couple of days, so will try and fix it on my return, however if you wait a bit and try selecting the data sources again, it should still work, the other graphs need to create the data sources before this graph cab use them.
Cool I lookforward to the fix.
Thanks

Also just a suggestion to go along with the graph. It would be nice to see an Average of all the CPUs over all the data instead of just the current ongoing average. The min. CPU spec seems less important as what the Average of the use would be.

-Josh
argon0
Cacti User
Posts: 460
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2004 1:22 pm

Post by argon0 »

OK, try this version out... Again you will have to have the CPUs graphed already for this graph to work...

Argon0
Attachments
cacti_graph_template_multi_cpu_utilization_on_8_processor_box.xml
New Version - now displays MEAN CPU utilisation for the period rather than minimum, AND divides by 8 rather than 5 (whoops)...
(34.9 KiB) Downloaded 1924 times
No longer a n00by, probably, by now an 0ldby

Now Head of Technology at RSCH, back to the prickly subject of Monitorring....
joshm
Cacti User
Posts: 82
Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 1:34 pm
Location: STL

Post by joshm »

Still no luck. This is still the only graph out of the 2proc & 4proc that prompts me for that additional index information. I selected the sources just like I did for the 2 & 4 graph but no luck. No graph is even created and all I see is the text blurb.

RRDTool Command:

n:/rrdtool/rrdtool.exe graph - \
--imgformat=PNG \
--start=-86400 \
--end=-300 \
--title="Multi CPU Utilization on AlphaSQL (SQL3)" \
--base=1000 \
--height=120 \
--width=500 \
--alt-autoscale-max \
--lower-limit=0 \
--vertical-label="" \
--slope-mode \
--font TITLE:10:c:/winnt/fonts/timesbd.ttf \
--font AXIS:9:c:/winnt/fonts/arial.ttf \
--font LEGEND:11:c:/winnt/fonts/arial.ttf \
--font UNIT:9:c:/winnt/fonts/arial.ttf \
DEF:a="N\:/cacti/rra/alphasql_sql3_cpu_705.rrd":cpu:AVERAGE \
DEF:b="N\:/cacti/rra/alphasql_sql3_cpu_706.rrd":cpu:AVERAGE \
DEF:c="N\:/cacti/rra/alphasql_sql3_cpu_707.rrd":cpu:AVERAGE \
DEF:d="N\:/cacti/rra/alphasql_sql3_cpu_708.rrd":cpu:AVERAGE \
DEF:e="N\:/cacti/rra/alphasql_sql3_cpu_709.rrd":cpu:AVERAGE \
DEF:f="N\:/cacti/rra/alphasql_sql3_cpu_710.rrd":cpu:AVERAGE \
DEF:g="N\:/cacti/rra/alphasql_sql3_cpu_711.rrd":cpu:AVERAGE \
DEF:h="N\:/cacti/rra/alphasql_sql3_cpu_712.rrd":cpu:AVERAGE \
CDEF:cdefa=a,b,+,c,+,d,+,e,+,f,+,g,+,h,+,8,/ \
AREA:cdefa#F9FD5F:"Mean CPU\:" \
GPRINT:cdefa:LAST:"Current\:%8.2lf %%" \
GPRINT:cdefa:AVERAGE:"Mean\:%8.2lf %%" \
GPRINT:cdefa:MAX:"Max\:%8.2lf %%\n" \
LINE1:a#0000FF:"CPU0\:" \
GPRINT::LAST:" Current\:%8.2lf %%" \
GPRINT:a:AVERAGE:" Mean\:%8.2lf %%" \
GPRINT::MAX:" Max\:%8.2lf %%\n" \
LINE1:b#00A348:"CPU1\:" \
GPRINT::LAST:" Current\:%8.2lf %%" \
GPRINT:b:AVERAGE:" Mean\:%8.2lf %%" \
GPRINT::MAX:" Max\:%8.2lf %%\n" \
LINE1:c#C4FD3D:"CPU2\:" \
GPRINT:c:LAST:" Current\:%8.2lf %%" \
GPRINT:c:AVERAGE:"Mean\:%8.2lf %%" \
GPRINT::MAX:"Max\:%8.2lf %%\n" \
LINE1:d#FF0000:"CPU3\:" \
GPRINT:d:LAST:" Current\:%8.2lf %%" \
GPRINT:d:AVERAGE:"Mean\:%8.2lf %%" \
GPRINT:d:MAX:"Max\:%8.2lf %%\n" \
LINE1:e#000000:"CPU4\:" \
GPRINT:e:LAST:" Current\:%8.2lf %%" \
GPRINT:e:AVERAGE:"Mean\:%8.2lf %%" \
GPRINT:e:MAX:"Max\:%8.2lf %%\n" \
LINE1:f#00BED9:"CPU5\:" \
GPRINT:f:LAST:" Current\:%8.2lf %%" \
GPRINT:f:AVERAGE:"Mean\:%8.2lf %%" \
GPRINT:f:MAX:"Max\:%8.2lf %%\n" \
LINE1:g#FF00FF:"CPU6\:" \
GPRINT:g:LAST:" Current\:%8.2lf %%" \
GPRINT:g:AVERAGE:"Mean\:%8.2lf %%" \
GPRINT:g:MAX:"Max\:%8.2lf %%\n" \
LINE1:h#AAABA1:"CPU7\:" \
GPRINT:h:LAST:" Current\:%8.2lf %%" \
GPRINT:h:AVERAGE:"Mean\:%8.2lf %%" \
GPRINT:h:MAX:"Max\:%8.2lf %%"

RRDTool Says:

ERROR: Could not parse line 'GPRINT::LAST: Current\:%8.2lf %%'
joshm
Cacti User
Posts: 82
Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 1:34 pm
Location: STL

Post by joshm »

Something I just noticed.. It appears that the 4 proc graph is using 1 data source twice

RRDTool Command:

n:/rrdtool/rrdtool.exe graph - \
--imgformat=PNG \
--start=-86400 \
--end=-300 \
--title="Multi CPU Utilization on AlphaSQL (SQL3)" \
--base=1000 \
--height=120 \
--width=500 \
--alt-autoscale-max \
--lower-limit=0 \
--vertical-label="" \
--slope-mode \
--font TITLE:10:c:/winnt/fonts/timesbd.ttf \
--font AXIS:9:c:/winnt/fonts/arial.ttf \
--font LEGEND:11:c:/winnt/fonts/arial.ttf \
--font UNIT:9:c:/winnt/fonts/arial.ttf \
DEF:a="N\:/cacti/rra/alphasql_sql3_cpu_709.rrd":cpu:AVERAGE \
DEF:b="N\:/cacti/rra/alphasql_sql3_cpu_709.rrd":cpu:AVERAGE \
DEF:c="N\:/cacti/rra/alphasql_sql3_cpu_711.rrd":cpu:AVERAGE \
DEF:d="N\:/cacti/rra/alphasql_sql3_cpu_710.rrd":cpu:AVERAGE \
DEF:e="N\:/cacti/rra/alphasql_sql3_cpu_712.rrd":cpu:AVERAGE \
CDEF:cdefa=a,b,+,c,+,d,+,4,/ \
AREA:cdefa#FAFD9E:"Mean CPU" \
GPRINT:cdefa:LAST:" Current\:%8.2lf %%" \
GPRINT:cdefa:MIN:"Min\:%8.2lf %%" \
GPRINT:cdefa:MAX:"Max\:%8.2lf %%\n" \
LINE1:b#0000FF:"CPU0" \
GPRINT:b:LAST:" Current\:%8.2lf %%" \
GPRINT:b:MIN:"Min\:%8.2lf %%" \
GPRINT:b:MAX:"Max\:%8.2lf %%\n" \
LINE1:c#00A348:"CPU1" \
GPRINT:c:LAST:" Current\:%8.2lf %%" \
GPRINT:c:MIN:"Min\:%8.2lf %%" \
GPRINT:c:MAX:"Max\:%8.2lf %%\n" \
LINE1:d#C4FD3D:"CPU2" \
GPRINT:d:AVERAGE:" Current\:%8.2lf %%" \
GPRINT:d:MIN:"Min\:%8.2lf %%" \
GPRINT:d:MAX:"Max\:%8.2lf %%\n" \
LINE1:e#FF0000:"CPU3" \
GPRINT:e:AVERAGE:" Current\:%8.2lf %%" \
GPRINT:e:MIN:"Min\:%8.2lf %%" \
GPRINT:e:MAX:"Max\:%8.2lf %%"

RRDTool Says:

OK
argon0
Cacti User
Posts: 460
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2004 1:22 pm

Post by argon0 »

This is where you're graph is going wrong initially:

Yours

Code: Select all

LINE1:a#0000FF:"CPU0\:" \
GPRINT[b]::[/b]LAST:" Current\:%8.2lf %%" \
GPRINT:a:AVERAGE:" Mean\:%8.2lf %%" \
GPRINT::MAX:" Max\:%8.2lf %%\n" \ 
Mine

Code: Select all

LINE1:a#0000FF:"CPU0\:"  \
GPRINT[b]:a:[/b]LAST:"    Current\:%8.2lf %%"  \
GPRINT:a:AVERAGE:"Mean\:%8.2lf %%"  \
GPRINT:a:MAX:"Max\:%8.2lf %%\n"  \
Hmm to get around this the best way may be for you to edit the template on your machine.

Goto:Console, Graph Templates

Choose the "Multi CPU Utilization on 8 Processor Box" template.

the items which seem to be in error are: Items, 6,8,10,12 & 16.

If you just click on these items you will see something like this:
Image

Make sure that each of these items say something like in this screen shot.. (The screen shot is for item 6), Item 8 should be similar with Consolidation function set to Max, Item 10 Consolidation set to Last, etc...

As to the extra data source in the 4 CPU template - that was before I realised you didn't need to do it twice I should change THAT template now...
Attachments
sshot2.png
sshot2.png (143.77 KiB) Viewed 21721 times
No longer a n00by, probably, by now an 0ldby

Now Head of Technology at RSCH, back to the prickly subject of Monitorring....
argon0
Cacti User
Posts: 460
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2004 1:22 pm

Post by argon0 »

THis should be better for 4 cpu, I've given it a different name, in case it breaks your graphs then you can revert to the former template.

THe earlier graph should have given you some dodgy average data...
Attachments
cacti_graph_template_multi_cpu_on_4_processor_box_fixed.xml
(23.35 KiB) Downloaded 1851 times
No longer a n00by, probably, by now an 0ldby

Now Head of Technology at RSCH, back to the prickly subject of Monitorring....
joshm
Cacti User
Posts: 82
Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 1:34 pm
Location: STL

Post by joshm »

Well No luck with either graph.... .grrrrrrrrrrrr

The fixed 4 CPU graph doesn't seem to want to attatch to the individual CPU graphs. I click save, and go back into the graph and again nothing but 'none' is selected.

The 8cpu graph appeared OK setting wise but just won't work for me.

Are you exporting these from the latest Cacti Version? Although It doesn't make since that your 2 & 4cpu exports worked fine, but that your 8 & newest 4 are not......

Has anyone else out there tried these graphs?
-Josh
argon0
Cacti User
Posts: 460
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2004 1:22 pm

Post by argon0 »

One more thing to try... Delete the host and start again.. Or do it with another host...

I AM doing the export from .0.8.6h

Argon0
No longer a n00by, probably, by now an 0ldby

Now Head of Technology at RSCH, back to the prickly subject of Monitorring....
joshm
Cacti User
Posts: 82
Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 1:34 pm
Location: STL

Post by joshm »

No Luck

I then looked under graph templates and noticed that the data sources links showed nothing checked....

So I copied off the working 4cpu graph and it started working. But it appears to still attempt to divide with 5 instead of 4.

-josh

also the data sources had 2 cpu1 instead of a cpu2. But the other 4cpu graph was setup the same.
argon0
Cacti User
Posts: 460
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2004 1:22 pm

Post by argon0 »

Ah... AND I am running the whole thing on Linux...
No longer a n00by, probably, by now an 0ldby

Now Head of Technology at RSCH, back to the prickly subject of Monitorring....
argon0
Cacti User
Posts: 460
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2004 1:22 pm

Post by argon0 »

The Average utilisation does not need a data source associated with it, if you DO associate a source it will LOOK as if it is working but will add an extra data source to the graph - thus it will give the wrong result for the average...

That took a bit of fiddling around to work out...

BTW I've now started using the Nagios Plugin to graph windows stuff, I'm testing it out on my desktop PC at the moment. 1st Graph is System Uptime - so I can set a threshold and get a reminder to reboot a PC every x no. of days...

If you are interested I'll post the templates I come up with here, BUT you do need to be running the Linux version of Cacti (I use CactiEZ distro from cactiusers.org). I'm thinking of writing a bit of a walkthrough as it is *slightly* complicated to get it to work (especially if you DON't realise that the check_nt plugin for linux is included with the Nsclient software!).

Argon0
No longer a n00by, probably, by now an 0ldby

Now Head of Technology at RSCH, back to the prickly subject of Monitorring....
joshm
Cacti User
Posts: 82
Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 1:34 pm
Location: STL

Post by joshm »

Taking the steps I noticed with the 4cpu graph of not having data source boxes checked I did the same with the 8cpu.. I found some random boxes under a specific item# boxes not checked so I checked those.. At a glance it appears ok now, but the text is looking messing at the bottom of the graph.. Going to try poking at it a bit more.

As of now I run cacti on windows, and where I have the cacti box hosted currently I have no system I could load linux up on. Maybe eventually I may switch things around with a spare PC here to load up cacti on a NIX box but for now that is not possible.

-Josh
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest