v0.8.6g upgrade = Loss of historical data.
Moderators: Developers, Moderators
v0.8.6g upgrade = Loss of historical data.
I upgraded from v0.8.6c to v0.8.6g (with all pre-patched files) and all previous data was lost.
I restored a backup and upgraded from 0.8.6c to 0.8.6f and all was fine.
Then I tried to go from another fresh download and install of 0.8.6g (f to g) and again all past data was lost.
restored backup again, then upgraded to f once more.
I am currently running OK on 0.8.6f
RHEL4
php 4.3.9
MySql 4.1.12
rrdtool 1.0.49
I restored a backup and upgraded from 0.8.6c to 0.8.6f and all was fine.
Then I tried to go from another fresh download and install of 0.8.6g (f to g) and again all past data was lost.
restored backup again, then upgraded to f once more.
I am currently running OK on 0.8.6f
RHEL4
php 4.3.9
MySql 4.1.12
rrdtool 1.0.49
- rony
- Developer/Forum Admin
- Posts: 6022
- Joined: Mon Nov 17, 2003 6:35 pm
- Location: Michigan, USA
- Contact:
How?
Did you erase the rra directory?
Did you erase the rra directory?
[size=117][i][b]Tony Roman[/b][/i][/size]
[size=84][i]Experience is what causes a person to make new mistakes instead of old ones.[/i][/size]
[size=84][i]There are only 3 way to complete a project: Good, Fast or Cheap, pick two.[/i][/size]
[size=84][i]With age comes wisdom, what you choose to do with it determines whether or not you are wise.[/i][/size]
[size=84][i]Experience is what causes a person to make new mistakes instead of old ones.[/i][/size]
[size=84][i]There are only 3 way to complete a project: Good, Fast or Cheap, pick two.[/i][/size]
[size=84][i]With age comes wisdom, what you choose to do with it determines whether or not you are wise.[/i][/size]
no, the rra folder was copied over,(just verified again) and I did the install/upgrade twice just to make sure I didn't miss anything and/or the tar.gz file was not corrupted in any way. The SQL changes all passed, the upgrade seemed to work as intended. I don't know what the cause of the missing historical is, seems odd since v.f is working.
I tried the upgrade to v.g from both v.c and v.f with the same results, loss of historical data.
I tried the upgrade to v.g from both v.c and v.f with the same results, loss of historical data.
- rony
- Developer/Forum Admin
- Posts: 6022
- Joined: Mon Nov 17, 2003 6:35 pm
- Location: Michigan, USA
- Contact:
Take no offence by this, but you are doing something wrong. Other people, including myself don't loose historical data (rra files) when we upgrade.
[size=117][i][b]Tony Roman[/b][/i][/size]
[size=84][i]Experience is what causes a person to make new mistakes instead of old ones.[/i][/size]
[size=84][i]There are only 3 way to complete a project: Good, Fast or Cheap, pick two.[/i][/size]
[size=84][i]With age comes wisdom, what you choose to do with it determines whether or not you are wise.[/i][/size]
[size=84][i]Experience is what causes a person to make new mistakes instead of old ones.[/i][/size]
[size=84][i]There are only 3 way to complete a project: Good, Fast or Cheap, pick two.[/i][/size]
[size=84][i]With age comes wisdom, what you choose to do with it determines whether or not you are wise.[/i][/size]
upgraded to v.g again today, this time keeping old data, but new graphs were not generated, basically the exact opposite problem as last time.
Having done this about 8 times now, I’m positive that I am not missing anything included in this how-to http://www.cacti.net/downloads/docs/html/upgrade.html
I'll stick with v.f for now, and try again after the next release.
Having done this about 8 times now, I’m positive that I am not missing anything included in this how-to http://www.cacti.net/downloads/docs/html/upgrade.html
I'll stick with v.f for now, and try again after the next release.
it's probably a permissions thing
i upgraded mine just recently and just about everything went smoothly, except i just noticed that about half of the windows 2003 servers hard drives and RAM graphs stopped getting data. i looked at the dates on the rra files and sure enough they we're updating.
i created a new test server to make sure nothing had happened all of a sudden to the windows 2003 snmp service (like a hotfix stuffing things up)...
i mucked around for a while and did the unthinkable and did a chmod 777 -R * under /var/www/html/cacti directory.
that will learn it. it's an internal server only which only i use and have access to so i wasn't too worried about security of the pages.
i created a new test server to make sure nothing had happened all of a sudden to the windows 2003 snmp service (like a hotfix stuffing things up)...
i mucked around for a while and did the unthinkable and did a chmod 777 -R * under /var/www/html/cacti directory.
that will learn it. it's an internal server only which only i use and have access to so i wasn't too worried about security of the pages.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests