Large holes in my SNMP data, but only on some ports
Moderators: Developers, Moderators
Large holes in my SNMP data, but only on some ports
I just recently installed Cacti 0.8.6 on my Sun Netra T1 running Gentoo 2005.1. I configured it to work with my local home network equipment, and some of the Cable CMTS's at work (I work for my cable ISP) But I am running into problems with data completeness.
For example, the following two upstreams are on the same device, and even the same blade... yet, the custom SNMP stream for Upstream 1 works perfectly fine, and Upstream 4 has major holes in them.. Several of the upstreams are like this.
The username and password for viewing the graphs is "guest" (for both)
Cable4/0 Upstream 1 -> http://cacti.ultatryon.com/graph.php?lo ... rra_id=all
Cable4/0 Upstream 4 -> http://cacti.ultatryon.com/graph.php?lo ... rra_id=all
My other local SNMP queries work just fine, just some of these CMTS queries.
the only thing that looks odd, is this line in the logs:
09/12/2005 08:40:16 PM - SYSTEM STATS: Time: 13.7330 s, Method: cmd.php, Processes: 1, Threads: N/A, Hosts: 11, Hosts/Process: 11, Data Sources 273, RRDs Processed 173
Shouldnt it have 273 RRDs instead of 173, since there are 273 sources?
For example, the following two upstreams are on the same device, and even the same blade... yet, the custom SNMP stream for Upstream 1 works perfectly fine, and Upstream 4 has major holes in them.. Several of the upstreams are like this.
The username and password for viewing the graphs is "guest" (for both)
Cable4/0 Upstream 1 -> http://cacti.ultatryon.com/graph.php?lo ... rra_id=all
Cable4/0 Upstream 4 -> http://cacti.ultatryon.com/graph.php?lo ... rra_id=all
My other local SNMP queries work just fine, just some of these CMTS queries.
the only thing that looks odd, is this line in the logs:
09/12/2005 08:40:16 PM - SYSTEM STATS: Time: 13.7330 s, Method: cmd.php, Processes: 1, Threads: N/A, Hosts: 11, Hosts/Process: 11, Data Sources 273, RRDs Processed 173
Shouldnt it have 273 RRDs instead of 173, since there are 273 sources?
Turn on debugging in cacti and take a look at the upstream 4 polling results for several cycles. Find anything interesting? You said Upstream 1 and 4 are on the same device, so their response times are the same? What about cpu usage?
| Scripts: Monitor processes | RFC1213 MIB | DOCSIS Stats | Dell PowerEdge | Speedfan | APC UPS | DOCSIS CMTS | 3ware | Motorola Canopy |
| Guides: Windows Install | [HOWTO] Debug Windows NTFS permission problems |
| Tools: Windows All-in-one Installer |
C4/0/U1 is index 155.. the log shows the following for that
09/12/2005 10:20:08 PM - CMDPHP: Poller[0] Host[9] DS[155] SNMP: v1: 66.212.xxx.xxx, dsname: snmp_oid, oid: 1.3.6.1.2.1.10.127.1.1.4.1.5.10, output: 311
That output is above the original maxvalue (300) for that poller, however it has since been changed (to 500).. do I have to update the poller or RRD now that I have changed the maxvalue? and if so, how do I do that?
09/12/2005 10:20:08 PM - CMDPHP: Poller[0] Host[9] DS[155] SNMP: v1: 66.212.xxx.xxx, dsname: snmp_oid, oid: 1.3.6.1.2.1.10.127.1.1.4.1.5.10, output: 311
That output is above the original maxvalue (300) for that poller, however it has since been changed (to 500).. do I have to update the poller or RRD now that I have changed the maxvalue? and if so, how do I do that?
You need to update it in cacti AND the rrd file (since cacti doesn't do that yet).
rrdtool tune is the ticket for updating the rrd file.
rrdtool tune is the ticket for updating the rrd file.
| Scripts: Monitor processes | RFC1213 MIB | DOCSIS Stats | Dell PowerEdge | Speedfan | APC UPS | DOCSIS CMTS | 3ware | Motorola Canopy |
| Guides: Windows Install | [HOWTO] Debug Windows NTFS permission problems |
| Tools: Windows All-in-one Installer |
I looked at your graphs and like what you've done there. You wouldn't have a template for that you could share do you? I have nearly the same needs and could sure put this to good use.ultatryon wrote:as soon as I made that change, that chart started working again.. 311.0.. I didnt think it was going to actually care about the max, I am used to MRTG, where it allows higher then the max, but it has a line showing where the "maxvalue" is..
Thanks
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests