Templates and difficult instances - SNMP Informant

Post support questions that relate to the Windows 2003/2000/XP operating systems.

Moderators: Developers, Moderators

boots
Cacti User
Posts: 55
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2004 4:59 am
Location: Melbourne Australia

Templates and difficult instances - SNMP Informant

Post by boots »

Hi all,

I've successfully managed to write templates for CPU, Memory, Terminal Services etc from the Informant Advanced package however I am struggling with the disk template using the logical disk counters.

The logical disk instance is not the last OID object returned in the instance and the last object is the ASCII equivalent for the colon after the drive letter. The bolded OID object is the actual instance.

.1.3.6.1.4.1.9600.1.2.44.1.1.2.67.58 is C:
.1.3.6.1.4.1.9600.1.2.44.1.1.2.68.58 is D:
.1.3.6.1.4.1.9600.1.2.44.1.1.2.69.58 is E:

When I run my data query, Cacti can see the drive letters however it states the instance index is .58 for each (except the total disk).

+ Running data query [17].
+ Found type = '3' [snmp query].
+ Found data query XML file at 'D:\Websites\stats.boots.no-ip.org\Cacti/resource/snmp_queries/win32_disk.xml'
+ XML file parsed ok.
+ Executing SNMP walk for list of indexes @ '.1.3.6.1.4.1.9600.1.2.44.1.1'
+ Located input field 'diskinstance' [walk]
+ Executing SNMP walk for data @ '.1.3.6.1.4.1.9600.1.2.44.1.1'
+ Found item [diskinstance='C:'] index: 58 [from value]
+ Found item [diskinstance='D:'] index: 58 [from value]
+ Found item [diskinstance='E:'] index: 58 [from value]
+ Found item [diskinstance='_Total'] index: 108 [from value]
+ Found data query XML file at 'D:\Websites\stats.boots.no-ip.org\Cacti/resource/snmp_queries/win32_disk.xml'
+ Found data query XML file at 'D:\Websites\stats.boots.no-ip.org\Cacti/resource/snmp_queries/win32_disk.xml'
+ Found data query XML file at 'D:\Websites\stats.boots.no-ip.org\Cacti/resource/snmp_queries/win32_disk.xml'

When I create the graphs for the host, and expect to select the C, D, E and total instances, the data query only presents the E: and total instances to select from. What the data query thinks is the index is the same for the C, D and E instances so for some reason Cacti only knows about the last one and presents that in the query.

My question to all is how can I write my data query to recognise the instance as the second last OID object and not the last? ie,

My snmp data query is

<interface>
<name>Win32 - Informant - Disk Stats</name>
<description>Using SNMP-Informant Queries a host for a list of Disk(s) and their stats</description>
<oid_index>.1.3.6.1.4.1.9600.1.2.44.1.1</oid_index>
<index_order_type>numeric</index_order_type>
<fields>
<diskinstance>
<name>Disk Instance</name>
<method>walk</method>
<source>value</source>
<direction>input</direction>
<oid>.1.3.6.1.4.1.9600.1.2.44.1.1</oid>
</diskinstance>
<diskfreespace>
<name>Free Space</name>
<method>walk</method>
<source>value</source>
<direction>output</direction>
<oid>.1.3.6.1.4.1.9600.1.2.44.1.5</oid>
</diskfreespace>
</fields>
</interface>

Any advice would be greatly appreciated and I'll post my templates when I nail this one.

Thanks in advance

Steve
User avatar
TheWitness
Developer
Posts: 17047
Joined: Tue May 14, 2002 5:08 pm
Location: MI, USA
Contact:

Post by TheWitness »

Please Google for the following <oid_index_parse> and you will have found the rosetta stone.

TheWitness
True understanding begins only when we realize how little we truly understand...

Life is an adventure, let yours begin with Cacti!

Author of dozens of Cacti plugins and customization's. Advocate of LAMP, MariaDB, IBM Spectrum LSF and the world of batch. Creator of IBM Spectrum RTM, author of quite a bit of unpublished work and most of Cacti's bugs.
_________________
Official Cacti Documentation
GitHub Repository with Supported Plugins
Percona Device Packages (no support)
Interesting Device Packages


For those wondering, I'm still here, but lost in the shadows. Yearning for less bugs. Who want's a Cacti 1.3/2.0? Streams anyone?
boots
Cacti User
Posts: 55
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2004 4:59 am
Location: Melbourne Australia

Post by boots »

Thanks The Witness,

I found a few examples and this did the job nicely after a bit of trial and error.
wally.nl
Posts: 8
Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2005 9:40 am
Contact:

Post by wally.nl »

Hi,

Could you be so kind to post your final xml result ?

I'm having kind of the same problem with 'processtable/processentry' (.1.3.6.1.4.1.9600.1.2.64.1) which returns variable length oid's which contain the entire process name in ascii. The indexes that cacti now returns (last posisiton of OID) contain doubles which result in only 23 out of the 43 processes running.

example: .1.3.6.1.4.1.9600.1.2.64.1.1.7.67.108.117.115.83.118.99

where the part 67.108.117.115.83.118.99 spells ClusSvc.

so index returned is [99] but i'd like it to be 7.67.108.117.115.83.118.99
georger_br
Cacti User
Posts: 63
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 10:12 am
Location: Brazil

Post by georger_br »

Hmm,
how about contributing this to the community? It would be really useful. Regards,

Georger
wally.nl wrote:Hi,

Could you be so kind to post your final xml result ?

I'm having kind of the same problem with 'processtable/processentry' (.1.3.6.1.4.1.9600.1.2.64.1) which returns variable length oid's which contain the entire process name in ascii. The indexes that cacti now returns (last posisiton of OID) contain doubles which result in only 23 out of the 43 processes running.

example: .1.3.6.1.4.1.9600.1.2.64.1.1.7.67.108.117.115.83.118.99

where the part 67.108.117.115.83.118.99 spells ClusSvc.

so index returned is [99] but i'd like it to be 7.67.108.117.115.83.118.99
wally.nl
Posts: 8
Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2005 9:40 am
Contact:

Post by wally.nl »

georger_br wrote:Hmm,
how about contributing this to the community? It would be really useful. Regards,

Georger
Hi Georger,

I don't understand this kind of reply. I had a sincere question (which did not get answered). But if everybody would wait posting answers until the person with a question 'contributed to the comunity' than we would have a serious deadlock and there would be no answers at all :lol:

Meanwhile I've found the answer myself so I'll post my findings in a few minutes. I'm under the impression that you think I am some lame-ass leecher that never contributes but this is not true. I'm just new to cacti and thus have not much to contribute. My expertise lies in other fields where I DO contribute.

Walter.
wally.nl
Posts: 8
Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2005 9:40 am
Contact:

Never mind...found it myself

Post by wally.nl »

Here's the solution (this one works with SNMP Informand ADVANCED which I use). The trick is in the <oid_index_parse>

Code: Select all

WIN32_DISK.XML:

<query>
        <name>Win32 Physical Disk Table - SNMP (Informant)</name>
        <description>Using SNMP-Informant Queries for a list of logical disks and their stats</description>
        <oid_index>.1.3.6.1.4.1.9600.1.2.61.1</oid_index>
        <oid_index_parse>OID/REGEXP:.*\.9600\.1\.2\.61\.1\.1\.([0-9\.]*)$</oid_index_parse>
        <index_order>informDiskInstance</index_order>
        <index_order_type>alphabetic</index_order_type>
        <index_title_format>|chosen_order_field|</index_title_format>
        <fields>
                <informDiskInstance>
                        <name>Disk Instance</name>
                        <method>walk</method>
                        <source>value</source>
                        <direction>input</direction>
                        <oid>.1.3.6.1.4.1.9600.1.2.61.1.1</oid>
                </informDiskInstance>
                <informAvgReadQueue>
                        <name>Avg Read Queue</name>
                        <method>walk</method>
                        <source>value</source>
                        <direction>output</direction>
                        <oid>.1.3.6.1.4.1.9600.1.2.61.1.10</oid>
                </informAvgReadQueue>
                <informAvgWriteQueue>
                        <name>Avg Write Queue</name>
                        <method>walk</method>
                        <source>value</source>
                        <direction>output</direction>
                        <oid>.1.3.6.1.4.1.9600.1.2.61.1.11</oid>
                </informAvgWriteQueue>
                <informCurrentQueue>
                        <name>Current Queue</name>
                        <method>walk</method>
                        <source>value</source>
                        <direction>output</direction>
                        <oid>.1.3.6.1.4.1.9600.1.2.61.1.15</oid>
                </informCurrentQueue>
        </fields>
</query>
georger_br
Cacti User
Posts: 63
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 10:12 am
Location: Brazil

Post by georger_br »

Hey, don't get me wrong here! :D
I just wanted to know how you did it, that's all. Peace!

Georger
wally.nl wrote:
georger_br wrote:Hmm,
how about contributing this to the community? It would be really useful. Regards,

Georger
Hi Georger,

I don't understand this kind of reply. I had a sincere question (which did not get answered). But if everybody would wait posting answers until the person with a question 'contributed to the comunity' than we would have a serious deadlock and there would be no answers at all :lol:

Meanwhile I've found the answer myself so I'll post my findings in a few minutes. I'm under the impression that you think I am some lame-ass leecher that never contributes but this is not true. I'm just new to cacti and thus have not much to contribute. My expertise lies in other fields where I DO contribute.

Walter.
georger_br
Cacti User
Posts: 63
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 10:12 am
Location: Brazil

Re: Never mind...found it myself

Post by georger_br »

wally,
THANK YOU VERY MUCH! This helped me IMMENSELY in getting the data I wanted. Great job!

Georger
wally.nl wrote:Here's the solution (this one works with SNMP Informand ADVANCED which I use). The trick is in the <oid_index_parse>

...
User avatar
skaminski
Cacti User
Posts: 92
Joined: Tue May 11, 2004 1:42 pm

Post by skaminski »

I've been trying to get this working off and on for awhile to no avail. We are also using the SNMP Informant Advanced counters and looking for a to get the specific counters you have in the XML.

Thanks for sharing this with the community.
pierre-luc
Posts: 8
Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2005 10:05 pm
Location: Montreal, Canada

same template but diffenrent OID

Post by pierre-luc »

Thanks for the template XML for informand snmp tool. For my servers, the OID was different, the is my xml file :

Code: Select all

<query>
        <name>Win32 Physical Disk Table - SNMP (Informant)</name>
        <description>Using SNMP-Informant Queries for a list of logical disks and their stats</description>
        <oid_index>.1.3.6.1.4.1.9600.1.1.1.1.1</oid_index>
        <oid_index_parse>OID/REGEXP:.*\.9600\.1\.1\.1\.1\.1\.([0-9\.]*)$</oid_index_parse>
        <index_order>informDiskInstance</index_order>
        <index_order_type>alphabetic</index_order_type>
        <index_title_format>|chosen_order_field|</index_title_format>
        <fields>
                <informDiskInstance>
                        <name>Disk Instance</name>
                        <method>walk</method>
                        <source>value</source>
                        <direction>input</direction>
                        <oid>.1.3.6.1.4.1.9600.1.1.1.1.1</oid>
                </informDiskInstance>
                <informAvgReadQueue>
                        <name>Avg Read Queue</name>
                        <method>walk</method>
                        <source>value</source>
                        <direction>output</direction>
                        <oid>.1.3.6.1.4.1.9600.1.1.1.1.8</oid>
                </informAvgReadQueue>
                <informAvgWriteQueue>
                        <name>Avg Write Queue</name>
                        <method>walk</method>
                        <source>value</source>
                        <direction>output</direction>
                        <oid>.1.3.6.1.4.1.9600.1.1.1.1.9</oid>
                </informAvgWriteQueue>
                <informCurrentQueue>
                        <name>Current Queue</name>
                        <method>walk</method>
                        <source>value</source>
                        <direction>output</direction>
                        <oid>.1.3.6.1.4.1.9600.1.1.1.1.13</oid>
                </informCurrentQueue>
                <informPctDiskTime>
                        <name>Pct Disk time</name>
                        <method>walk</method>
                        <source>value</source>
                        <direction>output</direction>
                        <oid>.1.3.6.1.4.1.9600.1.1.1.1.3</oid>
                </informPctDiskTime>
        </fields>
</query>
wally.nl
Posts: 8
Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2005 9:40 am
Contact:

RE: same template but diffenrent OID

Post by wally.nl »

Hi Piere-Luc
For my servers, the OID was different
Your different OIDs have nothing to do with your servers but with the free version of SNMP informant you are using. The template I posted was for the payed 'professional' version. I think it kinda s*cks that you have to update all your templates as soon as you upgrade from the free to the payed version but hey, I'm no sales person.
boots
Cacti User
Posts: 55
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2004 4:59 am
Location: Melbourne Australia

Post by boots »

As requested, listed below is my collection of Windows OS SNMP based templates.

I'm not the author of all of these, so many thanks to those who are and those who have helped me in the past....

Now looking into IIS and ISA 2004 templates....
Last edited by boots on Mon Sep 05, 2005 6:20 am, edited 1 time in total.
boots
Cacti User
Posts: 55
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2004 4:59 am
Location: Melbourne Australia

Post by boots »

Here are the files for SNMP Informant Advanced CPU
Attachments
Informant-CPU.zip
(8.42 KiB) Downloaded 453 times
CPU.jpg
CPU.jpg (67.4 KiB) Viewed 8751 times
boots
Cacti User
Posts: 55
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2004 4:59 am
Location: Melbourne Australia

Post by boots »

Here are the files for SNMP Informant Advanced Disk % Free
Attachments
DiskDrive.jpg
DiskDrive.jpg (49.65 KiB) Viewed 8750 times
Informant-Disk.zip
(6.56 KiB) Downloaded 408 times
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests