Traffic graph accuracy

Post general support questions here that do not specifically fall into the Linux or Windows categories.

Moderators: Developers, Moderators

Post Reply
Wildmike556
Posts: 6
Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2004 9:53 am
Location: Big Rapids, Michigan, USA

Traffic graph accuracy

Post by Wildmike556 »

I have been suspecting some problems with my graphs monitoring ethernet uplink ports for some time. There are graphs where an entire building is connected to a single gigabit uplink where the graph doesn't show the bandwidth ever passing 4Mbits or so, but I'm sure that the traffic must be surpassing that frequently, as friends of mine in the buildings I'm monitoring say they routinely use more than that.

I have the maximum value for the data source set to 18446744073709551616 (the highest number you can get with a 64-bit counter), but it doesn't make any difference.

Any suggestions?
BelgianViking
Cacti User
Posts: 97
Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2005 4:59 am
Location: Brussels, Belgium

Post by BelgianViking »

Make sure you're not putting MBytes/second values in your graph ! Do an SNMP-get on the value and compare it to the graph.
Wildmike556
Posts: 6
Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2004 9:53 am
Location: Big Rapids, Michigan, USA

Mbytes not the issue

Post by Wildmike556 »

The graphs that I'm creating are indeed in Mbytes, but still, I'm sure there's more going through these links than that. The ports I'm monitoring are gigabit fiber uplinks, each serving several college residence halls. Especially during evening hours I find it unlikely that the average for any of these ports would be as low as 4Mbytes per second, sustained. I know people that will often transfer several gigabytes into or off of campus, and I never see a spike.

I'm running version 0.8.5a on this particular machine - could there be some sort of math problem in the default graphs that's causing this?
ssams
Cacti User
Posts: 65
Joined: Tue Feb 01, 2005 5:54 pm
Location: Texas
Contact:

Post by ssams »

what model switch?

sometimes to verify i use solarwinds bandwidth gauge or performance monitor to validate my findings.

you can also look at the interface on the switch if it is ios based and look at 5min average.

i cant remember which one it was but i did have an ios that had a bug in the counters. that was a few years ago.
User avatar
TheWitness
Developer
Posts: 17062
Joined: Tue May 14, 2002 5:08 pm
Location: MI, USA
Contact:

Post by TheWitness »

If it's a device that typically reindexes, you need to upgrade to 0.8.6c. This happens with routers more often than switches. Of course you know that snmpv2 is required.

Regards,

TheWitness
True understanding begins only when we realize how little we truly understand...

Life is an adventure, let yours begin with Cacti!

Author of dozens of Cacti plugins and customization's. Advocate of LAMP, MariaDB, IBM Spectrum LSF and the world of batch. Creator of IBM Spectrum RTM, author of quite a bit of unpublished work and most of Cacti's bugs.
_________________
Official Cacti Documentation
GitHub Repository with Supported Plugins
Percona Device Packages (no support)
Interesting Device Packages


For those wondering, I'm still here, but lost in the shadows. Yearning for less bugs. Who want's a Cacti 1.3/2.0? Streams anyone?
Wildmike556
Posts: 6
Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2004 9:53 am
Location: Big Rapids, Michigan, USA

SNMPv2?

Post by Wildmike556 »

I've been monitoring using SNMPv1 because I don't know for sure what version the switches have on them.

For the most part I'm monitoring Nortel switches, models BPS 2000, BayStack 450 and BayStack 470.

Was SNMPv2 required for monitoring routers that reindex or just traffic monitoring period?
User avatar
TheWitness
Developer
Posts: 17062
Joined: Tue May 14, 2002 5:08 pm
Location: MI, USA
Contact:

Post by TheWitness »

snmpv2 is required for interfaces over 100mbps when you are using a 32bit counter. Gigabit interfaces are ~1.2Gbps. Therefore, they require a 64bit counter that is only provided when using snmpv2 or snmpv3.

TheWitness
True understanding begins only when we realize how little we truly understand...

Life is an adventure, let yours begin with Cacti!

Author of dozens of Cacti plugins and customization's. Advocate of LAMP, MariaDB, IBM Spectrum LSF and the world of batch. Creator of IBM Spectrum RTM, author of quite a bit of unpublished work and most of Cacti's bugs.
_________________
Official Cacti Documentation
GitHub Repository with Supported Plugins
Percona Device Packages (no support)
Interesting Device Packages


For those wondering, I'm still here, but lost in the shadows. Yearning for less bugs. Who want's a Cacti 1.3/2.0? Streams anyone?
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests