Traffic Graphs are not showing the accurate usage- version 1.2.10

Post general support questions here that do not specifically fall into the Linux or Windows categories.

Moderators: Developers, Moderators

Post Reply
Saji1980
Posts: 30
Joined: Sat May 14, 2016 3:42 pm

Traffic Graphs are not showing the accurate usage- version 1.2.10

Post by Saji1980 »

Hi!

I have 1G and 10G interfaces on FortiGate Firewall, Aruba switch and Dlink switch.
None of them are showing the correct graphs.

I have In/Out Bits (64-bit) graphs and snmpv2 selected in the device option.
I am taking D-Link example.

snmpwalk -OS -c mycommunity -v 2c 10.9.x.x .1.3.6.1.2.1.31.1.1.1.6.17

IF-MIB::ifHCInOctets.17 = Counter64: 2093929568340

snmpwalk -OS -c mycommunity -v 2c 10.9.x.x .1.3.6.1.2.1.31.1.1.1.10.17
IF-MIB::ifHCOutOctets.17 = Counter64: 510225986700

The tree view doesnt show traffic more thank 180M but if I run the live view and run iperf to test then I can see 500M.
See the graphs.
rrdtool info dlink-10g_traffic_in_21.rrd
filename = "dlink-10g_traffic_in_21.rrd"
rrd_version = "0003"
step = 300
last_update = 1585854901
header_size = 5216
ds[traffic_in].index = 0
ds[traffic_in].type = "COUNTER"
ds[traffic_in].minimal_heartbeat = 600
ds[traffic_in].min = 0.0000000000e+00
ds[traffic_in].max = 1.0000000000e+10
ds[traffic_in].last_ds = "177741792737139"
ds[traffic_in].value = 5.7011157860e+06
ds[traffic_in].unknown_sec = 0
ds[traffic_out].index = 1
ds[traffic_out].type = "COUNTER"
ds[traffic_out].minimal_heartbeat = 600
ds[traffic_out].min = 0.0000000000e+00
ds[traffic_out].max = 1.0000000000e+10
ds[traffic_out].last_ds = "1868734635284088"
ds[traffic_out].value = 1.4550467552e+07
ds[traffic_out].unknown_sec = 0
rra[0].cf = "AVERAGE"
rra[0].rows = 600
rra[0].cur_row = 441
rra[0].pdp_per_row = 1
rra[0].xff = 5.0000000000e-01
rra[0].cdp_prep[0].value = NaN
rra[0].cdp_prep[0].unknown_datapoints = 0
rra[0].cdp_prep[1].value = NaN
rra[0].cdp_prep[1].unknown_datapoints = 0
rra[1].cf = "AVERAGE"
rra[1].rows = 700
rra[1].cur_row = 556
rra[1].pdp_per_row = 6
rra[1].xff = 5.0000000000e-01
rra[1].cdp_prep[0].value = 1.7148943324e+07
rra[1].cdp_prep[0].unknown_datapoints = 0
rra[1].cdp_prep[1].value = 4.5255043845e+07
rra[1].cdp_prep[1].unknown_datapoints = 0
rra[2].cf = "AVERAGE"
rra[2].rows = 775
rra[2].cur_row = 746
rra[2].pdp_per_row = 24
rra[2].xff = 5.0000000000e-01
rra[2].cdp_prep[0].value = 8.5017060609e+07
rra[2].cdp_prep[0].unknown_datapoints = 0
rra[2].cdp_prep[1].value = 1.9207487433e+08
rra[2].cdp_prep[1].unknown_datapoints = 0
rra[3].cf = "AVERAGE"
rra[3].rows = 797
rra[3].cur_row = 518
rra[3].pdp_per_row = 288
rra[3].xff = 5.0000000000e-01
rra[3].cdp_prep[0].value = 1.6457638556e+08
rra[3].cdp_prep[0].unknown_datapoints = 202
rra[3].cdp_prep[1].value = 3.7645466428e+08
rra[3].cdp_prep[1].unknown_datapoints = 202
rra[4].cf = "MIN"
rra[4].rows = 600
rra[4].cur_row = 517
rra[4].pdp_per_row = 1
rra[4].xff = 5.0000000000e-01
rra[4].cdp_prep[0].value = NaN
rra[4].cdp_prep[0].unknown_datapoints = 0
rra[4].cdp_prep[1].value = NaN
rra[4].cdp_prep[1].unknown_datapoints = 0
rra[5].cf = "MIN"
rra[5].rows = 700
rra[5].cur_row = 196
rra[5].pdp_per_row = 6
rra[5].xff = 5.0000000000e-01
rra[5].cdp_prep[0].value = 5.6362265495e+06
rra[5].cdp_prep[0].unknown_datapoints = 0
rra[5].cdp_prep[1].value = 1.2185822970e+07
rra[5].cdp_prep[1].unknown_datapoints = 0
rra[6].cf = "MIN"
rra[6].rows = 775
rra[6].cur_row = 471
rra[6].pdp_per_row = 24
rra[6].xff = 5.0000000000e-01
rra[6].cdp_prep[0].value = 5.6350293828e+06
rra[6].cdp_prep[0].unknown_datapoints = 0
rra[6].cdp_prep[1].value = 1.2185822970e+07
rra[6].cdp_prep[1].unknown_datapoints = 0
rra[7].cf = "MIN"
rra[7].rows = 797
rra[7].cur_row = 189
rra[7].pdp_per_row = 288
rra[7].xff = 5.0000000000e-01
rra[7].cdp_prep[0].value = 5.6350293828e+06
rra[7].cdp_prep[0].unknown_datapoints = 202
rra[7].cdp_prep[1].value = 1.2175182657e+07
rra[7].cdp_prep[1].unknown_datapoints = 202
rra[8].cf = "MAX"
rra[8].rows = 600
rra[8].cur_row = 114
rra[8].pdp_per_row = 1
rra[8].xff = 5.0000000000e-01
rra[8].cdp_prep[0].value = NaN
rra[8].cdp_prep[0].unknown_datapoints = 0
rra[8].cdp_prep[1].value = NaN
rra[8].cdp_prep[1].unknown_datapoints = 0
rra[9].cf = "MAX"
rra[9].rows = 700
rra[9].cur_row = 33
rra[9].pdp_per_row = 6
rra[9].xff = 5.0000000000e-01
rra[9].cdp_prep[0].value = 5.8108615236e+06
rra[9].cdp_prep[0].unknown_datapoints = 0
rra[9].cdp_prep[1].value = 1.8492192959e+07
rra[9].cdp_prep[1].unknown_datapoints = 0
rra[10].cf = "MAX"
rra[10].rows = 775
rra[10].cur_row = 561
rra[10].pdp_per_row = 24
rra[10].xff = 5.0000000000e-01
rra[10].cdp_prep[0].value = 5.8108615236e+06
rra[10].cdp_prep[0].unknown_datapoints = 0
rra[10].cdp_prep[1].value = 1.8492192959e+07
rra[10].cdp_prep[1].unknown_datapoints = 0
rra[11].cf = "MAX"
rra[11].rows = 797
rra[11].cur_row = 424
rra[11].pdp_per_row = 288
rra[11].xff = 5.0000000000e-01
rra[11].cdp_prep[0].value = 5.8932895888e+06
rra[11].cdp_prep[0].unknown_datapoints = 202
rra[11].cdp_prep[1].value = 2.4268517157e+07
rra[11].cdp_prep[1].unknown_datapoints = 202
rra[12].cf = "LAST"
rra[12].rows = 600
rra[12].cur_row = 207
rra[12].pdp_per_row = 1
rra[12].xff = 5.0000000000e-01
rra[12].cdp_prep[0].value = NaN
rra[12].cdp_prep[0].unknown_datapoints = 0
rra[12].cdp_prep[1].value = NaN
rra[12].cdp_prep[1].unknown_datapoints = 0
rra[13].cf = "LAST"
rra[13].rows = 700
rra[13].cur_row = 664
rra[13].pdp_per_row = 6
rra[13].xff = 5.0000000000e-01
rra[13].cdp_prep[0].value = 5.7018552509e+06
rra[13].cdp_prep[0].unknown_datapoints = 0
rra[13].cdp_prep[1].value = 1.4577027916e+07
rra[13].cdp_prep[1].unknown_datapoints = 0
rra[14].cf = "LAST"
rra[14].rows = 775
rra[14].cur_row = 411
rra[14].pdp_per_row = 24
rra[14].xff = 5.0000000000e-01
rra[14].cdp_prep[0].value = 5.7018552509e+06
rra[14].cdp_prep[0].unknown_datapoints = 0
rra[14].cdp_prep[1].value = 1.4577027916e+07
rra[14].cdp_prep[1].unknown_datapoints = 0
rra[15].cf = "LAST"
rra[15].rows = 797
rra[15].cur_row = 446
rra[15].pdp_per_row = 288
rra[15].xff = 5.0000000000e-01
rra[15].cdp_prep[0].value = 5.7018552509e+06
rra[15].cdp_prep[0].unknown_datapoints = 202
rra[15].cdp_prep[1].value = 1.4577027916e+07
rra[15].cdp_prep[1].unknown_datapoints = 202

I even tried tune option which I found but it didnt help.
rrdtool tune dlink-10g_traffic_in_21.rrd -a traffic_out:10000000000
rrdtool tune dlink-10g_traffic_in_21.rrd -a traffic_in:10000000000

Anyone can help with this issue?

Thanks
Attachments
dlink1.JPG
dlink1.JPG (38.45 KiB) Viewed 1608 times
dlink.JPG
dlink.JPG (48.6 KiB) Viewed 1608 times
Last edited by Saji1980 on Fri Apr 03, 2020 2:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Saji1980
Posts: 30
Joined: Sat May 14, 2016 3:42 pm

Re: Traffic Graphs are not showing the accurate usage- version 1.2.10on

Post by Saji1980 »

Anyone who can give some tip?
netniV
Cacti Guru User
Posts: 3441
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2017 12:05 am

Re: Traffic Graphs are not showing the accurate usage- version 1.2.10

Post by netniV »

There are a few things to check, such as:
  • The returned value is not exceeding the data source defined maximum value
  • You don't have other devices timing out thus preventing the poller from making it to the remaining sources
  • You have actually got a value being returned from the data source
  • etc.
Cacti Developer & Release Manager
The Cacti Group

Director
BV IT Solutions Ltd

+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+

Cacti Resources:
Cacti Website (including releases)
Cacti Issues
Cacti Development Releases
Cacti Development Documentation
User avatar
TheWitness
Developer
Posts: 17007
Joined: Tue May 14, 2002 5:08 pm
Location: MI, USA
Contact:

Re: Traffic Graphs are not showing the accurate usage- version 1.2.10

Post by TheWitness »

In the just released 1.2.11, you can modify the Traffic Data Template and change the MAX value to |query_ifSpeed|, after that, you should run the Data Debugger and find the RRDfiles that have an incorrect MAX value. Though note that some VIP's and bonded interfaces report an incorrect ifSpeed or ifHighSpeed.
True understanding begins only when we realize how little we truly understand...

Life is an adventure, let yours begin with Cacti!

Author of dozens of Cacti plugins and customization's. Advocate of LAMP, MariaDB, IBM Spectrum LSF and the world of batch. Creator of IBM Spectrum RTM, author of quite a bit of unpublished work and most of Cacti's bugs.
_________________
Official Cacti Documentation
GitHub Repository with Supported Plugins
Percona Device Packages (no support)
Interesting Device Packages


For those wondering, I'm still here, but lost in the shadows. Yearning for less bugs. Who want's a Cacti 1.3/2.0? Streams anyone?
Saji1980
Posts: 30
Joined: Sat May 14, 2016 3:42 pm

Re: Traffic Graphs are not showing the accurate usage- version 1.2.10

Post by Saji1980 »

Thanks. Is it possible to do that in 1.2.10?
1.2.11 is still not available via yum on Centos7.
Saji1980
Posts: 30
Joined: Sat May 14, 2016 3:42 pm

Re: Traffic Graphs are not showing the accurate usage- version 1.2.10

Post by Saji1980 »

Why its becoming to much issue with simple graphs :(.
It used to be very easy before.
User avatar
Osiris
Cacti Guru User
Posts: 1424
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2015 10:10 am

Re: Traffic Graphs are not showing the accurate usage- version 1.2.10

Post by Osiris »

I think what happened was that somehow the packages lost a setting that calculated the max speed if the interfaces setting somehow. We have to republish the working package. Someone needs to research it.
Before history, there was a paradise, now dust.
Saji1980
Posts: 30
Joined: Sat May 14, 2016 3:42 pm

Re: Traffic Graphs are not showing the accurate usage- version 1.2.10

Post by Saji1980 »

Is the new package is available without any issue or you can please mention the best stable release?
Saji1980
Posts: 30
Joined: Sat May 14, 2016 3:42 pm

Re: Traffic Graphs are not showing the accurate usage- version 1.2.10

Post by Saji1980 »

Hi!

Can anyone please help in this. Now I have 1.2.11 and still the graphs can only go to 100MB. Where I have to add this ifspeed value. Please help.
thanks
Saji1980
Posts: 30
Joined: Sat May 14, 2016 3:42 pm

Re: Traffic Graphs are not showing the accurate usage- version 1.2.10

Post by Saji1980 »

are you referring to this?
Attachments
cacti-if.PNG
cacti-if.PNG (92.76 KiB) Viewed 1455 times
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: tembarek and 1 guest