Win32 - Monitor running processes
Moderators: Developers, Moderators
Hmm, it appears there are no memory, filepath, or run parameters, odd. What OS are you running this against?
Would you mind walking .1.3.6.1.2.1.25.5 and pasting the output.
Would you mind walking .1.3.6.1.2.1.25.5 and pasting the output.
| Scripts: Monitor processes | RFC1213 MIB | DOCSIS Stats | Dell PowerEdge | Speedfan | APC UPS | DOCSIS CMTS | 3ware | Motorola Canopy |
| Guides: Windows Install | [HOWTO] Debug Windows NTFS permission problems |
| Tools: Windows All-in-one Installer |
mumuuu
Under your data source definitions if you set the index type to "hrSWRunName" it will look for that process name and not the PID. So your answer is "yes, but you need to change the default"
It tells you about this in the README included in the archive.
BSOD2600
thanks for a very handy add on. It's much appreciated!
Under your data source definitions if you set the index type to "hrSWRunName" it will look for that process name and not the PID. So your answer is "yes, but you need to change the default"
It tells you about this in the README included in the archive.
BSOD2600
thanks for a very handy add on. It's much appreciated!
I am seeing some odd reports coming back from the CPU time and Memory. Everything looks clean but I think that it's an issue with my graph template, and maybe how I setup the Data Query.
Could someone post either screen captures or text details on how they have set all the fields for both the Data Queries, and Graph Template sections?
Thanks in advance
Could someone post either screen captures or text details on how they have set all the fields for both the Data Queries, and Graph Template sections?
Thanks in advance
BlueT: Odd. I'm running it against XP SP2 and Win2K3. Don't have any NT/2K boxes around to test. What service pack levels are you running? Use GetIF to walk the OID. It should provide you with a graphical representation of which OIDs are present on the sytem. Alternatively, you could get and run snmpwalk, which is part of net-snmp.
mumuuu: ajeskey has the right answer
ajeskey: I too have see some odd values for the CPU time. I'm not sure why it represents it as M.
mumuuu: ajeskey has the right answer
ajeskey: I too have see some odd values for the CPU time. I'm not sure why it represents it as M.
- Attachments
-
- CPU time = 1:01:39
- proc_dc.png (5.64 KiB) Viewed 16354 times
-
- CPU time = 0:02:46
- proc_explorer.png (5.37 KiB) Viewed 16354 times
| Scripts: Monitor processes | RFC1213 MIB | DOCSIS Stats | Dell PowerEdge | Speedfan | APC UPS | DOCSIS CMTS | 3ware | Motorola Canopy |
| Guides: Windows Install | [HOWTO] Debug Windows NTFS permission problems |
| Tools: Windows All-in-one Installer |
-
- Posts: 14
- Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2004 9:54 am
As of right now, explorer.exe is using 19,108K of memory and 13,480K of VM. I just checked the last graph and it says 19.10K.
Seems valid to me.
Seems valid to me.
| Scripts: Monitor processes | RFC1213 MIB | DOCSIS Stats | Dell PowerEdge | Speedfan | APC UPS | DOCSIS CMTS | 3ware | Motorola Canopy |
| Guides: Windows Install | [HOWTO] Debug Windows NTFS permission problems |
| Tools: Windows All-in-one Installer |
Hey, just a reference to someones comment earlier. This is exactly what I'm looking for, but for linux / unix hosts. Is this going to ever be ported to *nix, and if not, is there already an available script that can monitor a specific process thats running? Thanks, and good work on the script BSOD.
SxanRR
SxanRR
Heres is what I am seeings, the drop off on item1.jpg is legit, so that is not a problem.
As you can see the whole scaling is way off for me. I am sure its something that I did, but i just would like to know what!
Thanks!
As you can see the whole scaling is way off for me. I am sure its something that I did, but i just would like to know what!
Thanks!
- Attachments
-
- item1.JPG (39.88 KiB) Viewed 16335 times
-
- item2.JPG (43.23 KiB) Viewed 16335 times
The skew in the graphing of the memory is possibly caused because of the CDEF of 'divide by 1024'. I did this so that the memory and cpu would be visable on the same graph.
I assume you already know why there are gaps in the graphs.
I assume you already know why there are gaps in the graphs.
| Scripts: Monitor processes | RFC1213 MIB | DOCSIS Stats | Dell PowerEdge | Speedfan | APC UPS | DOCSIS CMTS | 3ware | Motorola Canopy |
| Guides: Windows Install | [HOWTO] Debug Windows NTFS permission problems |
| Tools: Windows All-in-one Installer |
BlueT: That is probably because you have not installed the proper microsoft MIB or there is a conflict and GetIF didnt load the MIB. Could take a look through getif.log and see if you see anything about a microsoft MIB having issues. Give Net-SNMP snmpwalk a try:
snmpwalk -v 1 -c <community> 127.0.0.1 .1.3.6.1.2.1.25.5
ajeskey: Hmmm, odd. Paste the raw output in from a debug cycle for the relivant sections. When you manually verify the OID for that process(es), does it number seem valid?
snmpwalk -v 1 -c <community> 127.0.0.1 .1.3.6.1.2.1.25.5
ajeskey: Hmmm, odd. Paste the raw output in from a debug cycle for the relivant sections. When you manually verify the OID for that process(es), does it number seem valid?
| Scripts: Monitor processes | RFC1213 MIB | DOCSIS Stats | Dell PowerEdge | Speedfan | APC UPS | DOCSIS CMTS | 3ware | Motorola Canopy |
| Guides: Windows Install | [HOWTO] Debug Windows NTFS permission problems |
| Tools: Windows All-in-one Installer |
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests