Cacti Graphs for Windows Server.

Post support questions that directly relate to Linux/Unix operating systems.

Moderators: Developers, Moderators

Post Reply
smithi2004
Posts: 4
Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2012 5:51 am

Cacti Graphs for Windows Server.

Post by smithi2004 »

Hi
Could you please provide latest Cacti templates for windows server.
I have downloaded Cacti_SNMP_INFORMANT_STD_W32_Metrics.zip file from the forums but I encounter the following error.

'No more variables left in this MIB View (It is past the end of the MIB tree)'

Please help me.


Thanks Ratna
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Data Query Debug Information
+ Running data query [27].
+ Found type = '3' [snmp query].
+ Found data query XML file at '/var/www/html/cacti-0.8.7g.Prod/resource/snmp_queries/snmp_informant_disk.xml'
+ XML file parsed ok.
+ Executing SNMP walk for list of indexes @ '.1.3.6.1.4.1.9600.1.1.1.1.1'
+ Index found at OID: '1.3.6.1.4.1.9600.1.1.1.1.1' value: 'No more variables left in this MIB View (It is past the end of the MIB tree)'
+ index_parse at OID: '1.3.6.1.4.1.9600.1.1.1.1.1' results: '1'
+ Located input field 'lDiskInstance' [walk]
+ Executing SNMP walk for data @ '.1.3.6.1.4.1.9600.1.1.1.1.1'
+ Found item [lDiskInstance='No more variables left in this MIB View (It is past the end of the MIB tree)'] index: 1 [from value]
+ Found data query XML file at '/var/www/html/cacti-0.8.7g.Prod/resource/snmp_queries/snmp_informant_disk.xml'
+ Found data query XML file at '/var/www/html/cacti-0.8.7g.Prod/resource/snmp_queries/snmp_informant_disk.xml'
+ Found data query XML file at '/var/www/html/cacti-0.8.7g.Prod/resource/snmp_queries/snmp_informant_disk.xml'
User avatar
BSOD2600
Cacti Moderator
Posts: 12171
Joined: Sat May 08, 2004 12:44 pm
Location: USA

Re: Cacti Graphs for Windows Server.

Post by BSOD2600 »

1) Your cacti install is Linux, so wrong forum.
2) Does a manual snmpwalk of .1.3.6.1.4.1.9600.1 against that windows server return any data? If not, then it appears that snmp-informant and/or SNMP is not properly functioning.
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests