Fail in update 0.087g to 0.87h

Post general support questions here that do not specifically fall into the Linux or Windows categories.

Moderators: Developers, Moderators

Post Reply
jcb
Posts: 29
Joined: Thu May 19, 2011 10:14 pm

Fail in update 0.087g to 0.87h

Post by jcb »

I can not update the CACTI. Every time that presents the following problem:
0.8.7g -> 0.8.7h

[Fail] ALTER TABLE `data_template_rrd` ADD UNIQUE INDEX `duplicate_dsname_contraint` (`local_data_id`, `data_source_name`, `data_template_id`)
Please, I need help. Any hint!
User avatar
TheWitness
Developer
Posts: 17007
Joined: Tue May 14, 2002 5:08 pm
Location: MI, USA
Contact:

Re: Fail in update 0.087g to 0.87h

Post by TheWitness »

You can ignore that one. However, there are some critical patches that you should apply. You can see SVN (branches/0.8.7) and (PIA/trunk) for a list of those files.

TheWitness
True understanding begins only when we realize how little we truly understand...

Life is an adventure, let yours begin with Cacti!

Author of dozens of Cacti plugins and customization's. Advocate of LAMP, MariaDB, IBM Spectrum LSF and the world of batch. Creator of IBM Spectrum RTM, author of quite a bit of unpublished work and most of Cacti's bugs.
_________________
Official Cacti Documentation
GitHub Repository with Supported Plugins
Percona Device Packages (no support)
Interesting Device Packages


For those wondering, I'm still here, but lost in the shadows. Yearning for less bugs. Who want's a Cacti 1.3/2.0? Streams anyone?
jcb
Posts: 29
Joined: Thu May 19, 2011 10:14 pm

Re: Fail in update 0.087g to 0.87h

Post by jcb »

Thanks for your reply!

I thought it better to restore a backup copy of the cacti server [VM]. But another problem arose, I do not know if this is the best place to post: the / var partition where you installed the cacti does not accept any type of change, how to write data, delete file, I have always received the message 'read-only file system '. The mount command says the partition is mounted as rw. What I found is that after restore a backup there were still some changes to the FS.
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests