WinXP-Win8, Win2000-Server 2012 x32/x64 Templates

[G0dSmack]

Thank you for the response. I am using v9 on page 9 of this thread. I am stumped as to why the memory graphs are not displaying properly.

The other graphs are working properly. The machine being graphed below has 16 gig of RAM and is using at least half of it for SQL

graph_image.jpg

I have several SQL servers I am monitoring with up to 72GB of memory without any issues. Not sure why you are not getting memory graphed correctly. Any luck since you last posted?

[nicoCn]

Thanks G0dSmack and everyone.

I installed cacti 0.8.7g on windows 2003.
I want to use this templates , when i imported this template , can't get any cpu:

Code: Select all

Data Query Debug Information
+ Running data query [13].
+ Found type = '3' [snmp query].
+ Found data query XML file at 'C:/Apache2/htdocs/cacti/resource/snmp_queries/snmp_informant_cpu.xml'
+ XML file parsed ok.
+ Executing SNMP walk for list of indexes @ '.1.3.6.1.4.1.9600.1.1.5.1'
+ No SNMP data returned
+ Found data query XML file at 'C:/Apache2/htdocs/cacti/resource/snmp_queries/snmp_informant_cpu.xml'
+ Found data query XML file at 'C:/Apache2/htdocs/cacti/resource/snmp_queries/snmp_informant_cpu.xml'
+ Found data query XML file at 'C:/Apache2/htdocs/cacti/resource/snmp_queries/snmp_informant_cpu.xml'

Is this templat used only on linux ?

[G0dSmack]

You need SNMP informant installed on any Windows machine you would like to monitor using these templates.

[nicoCn]

You need SNMP informant installed on any Windows machine you would like to monitor using these templates.

Thanks G0dSmack. I see.

[nicoCn]

You need SNMP informant installed on any Windows machine you would like to monitor using these templates.

I have already installed SNMP informat ，now it looks work very nice.
nice and nice. ths G0dSmack.

[jsmickey]

Thank you for the response. I am using v9 on page 9 of this thread. I am stumped as to why the memory graphs are not displaying properly.

The other graphs are working properly. The machine being graphed below has 16 gig of RAM and is using at least half of it for SQL

graph_image.jpg

I have several SQL servers I am monitoring with up to 72GB of memory without any issues. Not sure why you are not getting memory graphed correctly. Any luck since you last posted?

New servers I have built since the cacti installation report the memory properly.

[G0dSmack]

Thank you for the response. I am using v9 on page 9 of this thread. I am stumped as to why the memory graphs are not displaying properly.

The other graphs are working properly. The machine being graphed below has 16 gig of RAM and is using at least half of it for SQL

graph_image.jpg

I have several SQL servers I am monitoring with up to 72GB of memory without any issues. Not sure why you are not getting memory graphed correctly. Any luck since you last posted?

New servers I have built since the cacti installation report the memory properly.

very cool. glad they are working now.

[Vader666]

Hello all,

I have the following problem :

I've installed cacti on my win2008R2 server for monitoring itself. I use the template generously given here but the graphs are not ok.

For example the CPU graphs are like that :
http://gyazo.com/5c38d5d9219ae86c0bb79319c42065a2.png

No legends, no numbers... Not very useful.

And the Memory graph just don't work.

Someone have any ideas ?

[G0dSmack]

Hello all,

I have the following problem :

I've installed cacti on my win2008R2 server for monitoring itself. I use the template generously given here but the graphs are not ok.

For example the CPU graphs are like that :
http://gyazo.com/5c38d5d9219ae86c0bb79319c42065a2.png

No legends, no numbers... Not very useful.

And the Memory graph just don't work.

Someone have any ideas ?

Have you installed SNMP Informant and configured SNMP on the server?

[Vader666]

Yes, SNMP Informant is installed (and seems to be ok, in the eventlog of windows I have an event for the start of SNMP Informant).
What do you mean exactly by configured SNMP on the server ?
I have installed and launched the SNMP service and configured my community etc...
When i go on my device in Cacti I have the correct SNMP informations.

I must have missed something... But i don't see what :/

[ecunoeil]

Hi, first big thanks for this great job.

I have a strange problem. All xml are imported in the right folder, all template are good imported. SNMP is install on Windows Server 2008R2 and Informant is also installed and started.

But I don't see any graphs regarding those statistics.

When I try a verbose query, I receive this report:

+ Running data query [10].
+ Found type = '3' [snmp query].
+ Found data query XML file at '/usr/share/cacti/resource/snmp_queries/snmp_informant_cpu.xml'
+ XML file parsed ok.
+ Executing SNMP walk for list of indexes @ '.1.3.6.1.4.1.9600.1.1.5.1'
+ Index found at OID: '1.3.6.1.4.1.9600.1.1.5.1.1.1.48' value: '0'
+ Index found at OID: '1.3.6.1.4.1.9600.1.1.5.1.1.6.95.84.111.116.97.108' value: '_Total'
+ Index found at OID: '1.3.6.1.4.1.9600.1.1.5.1.2.1.48' value: '0'
+ Index found at OID: '1.3.6.1.4.1.9600.1.1.5.1.2.6.95.84.111.116.97.108' value: '0'
+ Index found at OID: '1.3.6.1.4.1.9600.1.1.5.1.3.1.48' value: '0'
+ Index found at OID: '1.3.6.1.4.1.9600.1.1.5.1.3.6.95.84.111.116.97.108' value: '0'
+ Index found at OID: '1.3.6.1.4.1.9600.1.1.5.1.4.1.48' value: '0'
+ Index found at OID: '1.3.6.1.4.1.9600.1.1.5.1.4.6.95.84.111.116.97.108' value: '0'
+ Index found at OID: '1.3.6.1.4.1.9600.1.1.5.1.5.1.48' value: '1'
+ Index found at OID: '1.3.6.1.4.1.9600.1.1.5.1.5.6.95.84.111.116.97.108' value: '1'
+ Index found at OID: '1.3.6.1.4.1.9600.1.1.5.1.6.1.48' value: '0'
+ Index found at OID: '1.3.6.1.4.1.9600.1.1.5.1.6.6.95.84.111.116.97.108' value: '0'
+ Index found at OID: '1.3.6.1.4.1.9600.1.1.5.1.9.1.48' value: '0'
+ Index found at OID: '1.3.6.1.4.1.9600.1.1.5.1.9.6.95.84.111.116.97.108' value: '0'
+ Index found at OID: '1.3.6.1.4.1.9600.1.1.5.1.10.1.48' value: '12'
+ Index found at OID: '1.3.6.1.4.1.9600.1.1.5.1.10.6.95.84.111.116.97.108' value: '12'
+ Index found at OID: '1.3.6.1.4.1.9600.1.1.5.1.11.1.48' value: '82'
+ Index found at OID: '1.3.6.1.4.1.9600.1.1.5.1.11.6.95.84.111.116.97.108' value: '82'
+ index_parse at OID: '1.3.6.1.4.1.9600.1.1.5.1.1.1.48' results: '1.48'
+ index_parse at OID: '1.3.6.1.4.1.9600.1.1.5.1.1.6.95.84.111.116.97.108' results: '6.95.84.111.116.97.108'
+ index_parse at OID: '1.3.6.1.4.1.9600.1.1.5.1.2.1.48' results: '1.3.6.1.4.1.9600.1.1.5.1.2.1.48'
+ index_parse at OID: '1.3.6.1.4.1.9600.1.1.5.1.2.6.95.84.111.116.97.108' results: '1.3.6.1.4.1.9600.1.1.5.1.2.6.95.84.111.116.97.108'
+ index_parse at OID: '1.3.6.1.4.1.9600.1.1.5.1.3.1.48' results: '1.3.6.1.4.1.9600.1.1.5.1.3.1.48'
+ index_parse at OID: '1.3.6.1.4.1.9600.1.1.5.1.3.6.95.84.111.116.97.108' results: '1.3.6.1.4.1.9600.1.1.5.1.3.6.95.84.111.116.97.108'
+ index_parse at OID: '1.3.6.1.4.1.9600.1.1.5.1.4.1.48' results: '1.3.6.1.4.1.9600.1.1.5.1.4.1.48'
+ index_parse at OID: '1.3.6.1.4.1.9600.1.1.5.1.4.6.95.84.111.116.97.108' results: '1.3.6.1.4.1.9600.1.1.5.1.4.6.95.84.111.116.97.108'
+ index_parse at OID: '1.3.6.1.4.1.9600.1.1.5.1.5.1.48' results: '1.3.6.1.4.1.9600.1.1.5.1.5.1.48'
+ index_parse at OID: '1.3.6.1.4.1.9600.1.1.5.1.5.6.95.84.111.116.97.108' results: '1.3.6.1.4.1.9600.1.1.5.1.5.6.95.84.111.116.97.108'
+ index_parse at OID: '1.3.6.1.4.1.9600.1.1.5.1.6.1.48' results: '1.3.6.1.4.1.9600.1.1.5.1.6.1.48'
+ index_parse at OID: '1.3.6.1.4.1.9600.1.1.5.1.6.6.95.84.111.116.97.108' results: '1.3.6.1.4.1.9600.1.1.5.1.6.6.95.84.111.116.97.108'
+ index_parse at OID: '1.3.6.1.4.1.9600.1.1.5.1.9.1.48' results: '1.3.6.1.4.1.9600.1.1.5.1.9.1.48'
+ index_parse at OID: '1.3.6.1.4.1.9600.1.1.5.1.9.6.95.84.111.116.97.108' results: '1.3.6.1.4.1.9600.1.1.5.1.9.6.95.84.111.116.97.108'
+ index_parse at OID: '1.3.6.1.4.1.9600.1.1.5.1.10.1.48' results: '1.3.6.1.4.1.9600.1.1.5.1.10.1.48'
+ index_parse at OID: '1.3.6.1.4.1.9600.1.1.5.1.10.6.95.84.111.116.97.108' results: '1.3.6.1.4.1.9600.1.1.5.1.10.6.95.84.111.116.97.108'
+ index_parse at OID: '1.3.6.1.4.1.9600.1.1.5.1.11.1.48' results: '1.3.6.1.4.1.9600.1.1.5.1.11.1.48'
+ index_parse at OID: '1.3.6.1.4.1.9600.1.1.5.1.11.6.95.84.111.116.97.108' results: '1.3.6.1.4.1.9600.1.1.5.1.11.6.95.84.111.116.97.108'
+ Located input field 'cpuInstance' [walk]
+ Executing SNMP walk for data @ '.1.3.6.1.4.1.9600.1.1.5.1.1'
+ Found item [cpuInstance='0'] index: 1.48 [from value]
+ Found item [cpuInstance='_Total'] index: 6.95.84.111.116.97.108 [from value]
+ Found data query XML file at '/usr/share/cacti/resource/snmp_queries/snmp_informant_cpu.xml'
+ Found data query XML file at '/usr/share/cacti/resource/snmp_queries/snmp_informant_cpu.xml'
+ Found data query XML file at '/usr/share/cacti/resource/snmp_queries/snmp_informant_cpu.xml'

Everything seems to be good but I don't see any graphs. Maybe can you help me?

Thanks in advance.

[Eliran]

Hi,

I am using cacti from the windows installer by BSOD2600 v1.95 - 2010-09-23 that have

-Cacti 0.8.7g
--Patches:
--Data Source Deactivation
--Graph List View Searching
--Interface Display
--LDAP Group Authenication
--Script Server Command Line Options
--Ping Response Fix
--One Minute Polling Interval Fix
-Spine 0.8.7g
-PIA 2.8
-Apache 2.2.16
-MySQL 5.1.50
-PHP 5.2.14
-Net-SNMP 5.5.0.2
-RRDTool 1.2.30
-GetIF 2.3.1

I attempt to get Network (I/O) and Network (Packets) on one of my server but i can't see data and no errors, it is 1 Gig that uses about 30% of his bandwidth, can some please help me?

Network_IO.jpg (379.06 KiB) Viewed 4952 times

Packets.jpg (345.33 KiB) Viewed 4952 times

[Findarato]

nm

[fromfbi]

Using cacti for monitoring mssql.Install infromant on ms box and now i have this,on screen3.
Some things u can see on bsd box.
Before using informant,all graphs work correctly.

[pxf520]

Help me，pls

ca.JPG (60.41 KiB) Viewed 11716 times

Why？？？？？？？？？