WinXP-Win8, Win2000-Server 2012 x32/x64 Templates

[rprague]

Just wanted to say thanks, amazingly nice for monitoring my windows servers, my boss was blown away by these.

Kudos to the OP.

[Sigiscomve]

Thanx. i installed SNMP informant and all run very fine!!!!!!

[fmagoufis]

Have the v10 scripts been posted yet?

[G0dSmack]

Hey guys I am glad everyone is having great success with these templates. I have been away for a while, but I am back. I Have not posted a v10 template set yet. But still working away. I am still using these templates every single day to monitor about 400 servers in my environment and they continue to work great. Stay tuned.

[mikaelf]

templates and scripts look awesome, good job. but I can't get any values from the SNMP Informant mib tree.

[mikfri@teheran snmpinformant]% snmpwalk -v2c -c public uppccv009.etraveli.net 1.3.6.1.4.1.9600 [15:28:27 on 11-02-28]
iso.3.6.1.4.1.9600 = No more variables left in this MIB View (It is past the end of the MIB tree)
[mikfri@teheran snmpinformant]% snmpwalk -v2c -c public uppccv009.etraveli.net .1.3.6.1.4.1.9600.1.2.52.1 [15:28:32 on 11-02-28]
iso.3.6.1.4.1.9600.1.2.52.1 = No more variables left in this MIB View (It is past the end of the MIB tree)
[mikfri@teheran snmpinformant]% snmpwalk -v2c -c public uppccv009.etraveli.net .1.3.6.1.4.1.9600.1.2.46 [15:28:55 on 11-02-28]
iso.3.6.1.4.1.9600.1.2.46 = No more variables left in this MIB View (It is past the end of the MIB tree)

I do get all other values normally, just can't get anything from the .9600 node.
I know this has nothing to do with the scripts, but something to do with the Windows XP Pro and/or SNMP service. Will keep trying ...

[stormonts]

G0dsmack, I'm not sure if this would be a question for you or the SNMP Informant folks. Do you know if the network interface OIDs put to the 64 bit counters or the 32 bit counters?

[G0dSmack]

These templates will work on both 32bit and 64bit. You have to use the SNMP Informant standard (free) installation though. The paid for versions have a different OID tree structure.

[stormonts]

Not the version of Windows, that actually counters used to collect data. More info here:

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk648/t ... 69ac.shtml

[stormonts]

Tow other things (not sure if you would be the right one to help or not):

1) Is it possible to make the CPU templates so that they fill up to 100% and not leave the white space? We had done this with CDEFs and out Linux graphs, but it involved totaling all data sources and then dividing by the number of CPUs. Not sure how it would work in this situation.

2) On our Windows 2008 servers, for whatever reason, the I/O and queue data sources/templates work fine when polling the logical disk performance counters for C:, but the physical disk counters are the ones that record the stats for D:, E:, F:, etc. Does the standard version of SNMP Informant Standard include the option for polling physical disk stats "pDiskDiskBytesPerSec" and they just aren't in your templates/scripts, or are those options not even present in the Standard version.

Thanks for the help.

Steve

[romain0412]

Hi,

I've some issues, I've copied the snmp_informant_*.xml in /path_cati/ressource/snmp_queries, after I've imported the template.

And now, when I associated data queries I've issues.

Code: Select all

+ Running data query [16].
+ Found type = '3' [snmp query].
+ Could not find data query XML file at 'path_cacti/resource/snmp_queries/snmp_informant_cpu.xml'
+ Error parsing XML file into an array.
+ Could not find data query XML file at 'path_cacti/resource/snmp_queries/snmp_informant_cpu.xml'
+ Could not find data query XML file at 'path_cacti/resource/snmp_queries/snmp_informant_cpu.xml'
+ Could not find data query XML file at 'path_cacti/resource/snmp_queries/snmp_informant_cpu.xml'

I don't understand why I didn't find them !

Thanks for your help,

[romain0412]

I've writed the good path in the template and all seems to be ok !

But, if someone know where can I look at in order to find what "cacti_path" use the template, it will be great.

Thanks,

Hi,

I've some issues, I've copied the snmp_informant_*.xml in /path_cati/ressource/snmp_queries, after I've imported the template.

And now, when I associated data queries I've issues.

Code: Select all

+ Running data query [16].
+ Found type = '3' [snmp query].
+ Could not find data query XML file at 'path_cacti/resource/snmp_queries/snmp_informant_cpu.xml'
+ Error parsing XML file into an array.
+ Could not find data query XML file at 'path_cacti/resource/snmp_queries/snmp_informant_cpu.xml'
+ Could not find data query XML file at 'path_cacti/resource/snmp_queries/snmp_informant_cpu.xml'
+ Could not find data query XML file at 'path_cacti/resource/snmp_queries/snmp_informant_cpu.xml'

I don't understand why I didn't find them !

Thanks for your help,

[jsmickey]

These graph templates and data sources are excellent. I have them working, but am having an issue with memory usage. The graph is not showing the proper total memory available and used for some Windows 2008 R2 64 bit machines. I have a box with 16 GB of RAM and it is showing 2 GB for that machine. Is there something I need to edit in the data source to return the proper values?

Thank you

[G0dSmack]

These graph templates and data sources are excellent. I have them working, but am having an issue with memory usage. The graph is not showing the proper total memory available and used for some Windows 2008 R2 64 bit machines. I have a box with 16 GB of RAM and it is showing 2 GB for that machine. Is there something I need to edit in the data source to return the proper values?

Thank you

Make sure you have the latest templates installed. There was an issue early on that would do this. It was fixed and I can confirm that I am monitoring Windows 2008 R2 systems will memory that large and larger without issues. Hope that helps.

[jsmickey]

Thank you for the response. I am using v9 on page 9 of this thread. I am stumped as to why the memory graphs are not displaying properly.

The other graphs are working properly. The machine being graphed below has 16 gig of RAM and is using at least half of it for SQL

Memory Usage

graph_image.jpg (106.99 KiB) Viewed 4893 times

[ocoralan]

Wonderful contribution. Thank you very much.