Who Want's A MacTrack 2.0?

[maymann]

Any news on this ?

[TheWitness]

The fields are there in 2.8, but still not being collected.

Right now, I am right in the middle of 0.8.7g, so I put this on the back burner.

If you want to take a crack at adding this collection to the ifInterfaces function and the view interfaces table, I will merge into 3.0 of MacTrack.

It's not too difficult. You have to add the columns to the insert statement, and use the same methodology for other fields.

Open a bug report and attach the patch.

Regards,

TheWitness

[maymann]

Hi,

Will this make it to the 3.0 release and when is this expected ?
or has this already been implemented ?

Thanks in advance !


~maymann

[TheWitness]

Yes, my plan is to spend some time in the February time frame on getting things in better shape for the next release.

TheWitness

[maymann]

Hi TheWitness,

do we now have:
- Duplex (half/full)
- Negotiation (auto/fixed)
- Portspeed (10M/100M/1G/10G)
- Others?
in DB and WebInterface for HP switches ?

Thanks again for a great plugin !

[phazzi]

Hello the Witness.

First of all, congratulations and thank you by doing such excelent work within cacti.

I have a sugestion that can make Mactrack a great revolution on cacti.

Mactrack does almost all the job but dont finished it.

Looks the case:

I have a switch, with 48 ports.
With Mactrack i can know what mac address and IP address and on the ports, COOL!

Now the Magic:

Why not Mactrack, when collect a mac address port, search for this macaddress on the cacti database.

So, if a device are registred at cacti and you make a link like: DEVICE X is on PORT Y of SWITCH A.

So we can know what 'cacti device' represents that MAC/IP address.

If it already do it please gimme a light in how to make happens.

cya!