Unable to set Aggregate correctly (HELP)

General discussion about Plugins for Cacti

Moderators: Developers, Moderators

Post Reply
tbaror
Cacti User
Posts: 75
Joined: Mon Jun 05, 2006 6:54 am

Unable to set Aggregate correctly (HELP)

Post by tbaror »

Hello All,
I am using CACTI Version 0.8.7g installed on win2k3 along with Aggregate 0.75 ver.
I have a 48 port switch that i would like to Aggregate 47 port without up-link to get the switch load but when i am doing aggregate using AREA/STACK i get only the first Interface chosen as graph , during the cration i get message that all other resources will be removed from graph.
following attached image of all steps i took to create Aggregate .
Please advice
Thanks
Attachments
Aggregate  creation steps
Aggregate creation steps
Agragate.png (640.74 KiB) Viewed 1166 times
tbaror
Cacti User
Posts: 75
Joined: Mon Jun 05, 2006 6:54 am

Re: Unable to set Aggregate correctly (HELP)

Post by tbaror »

anyone? :o
User avatar
gandalf
Developer
Posts: 22383
Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2004 2:46 am
Location: Muenster, Germany
Contact:

Re: Unable to set Aggregate correctly (HELP)

Post by gandalf »

How did you get to "part 4", please?
R.
tbaror
Cacti User
Posts: 75
Joined: Mon Jun 05, 2006 6:54 am

Re: Unable to set Aggregate correctly (HELP)

Post by tbaror »

gandalf wrote:How did you get to "part 4", please?
R.
Hi,

Right after part 3 if i don't associate it to graph type and device nothing happen so if associate it to corresponding device and graph i get following.

Thanks
User avatar
gandalf
Developer
Posts: 22383
Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2004 2:46 am
Location: Muenster, Germany
Contact:

Re: Unable to set Aggregate correctly (HELP)

Post by gandalf »

That should not be the case.
Many people do not now how to find the aggregate, as it is not associated to a host nor a graph template.
This will change with upcoming AGGREGATE 1.0
Until then, please find the graph when searching for template=NONE
It is NOT recommended to associate the aggregate to a host and/or template (the first one is not dangerous but the second is)
R.
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests