I've done quite a bit of digging into this. I'm 99% sure this is a SPINE/netsnmp bug. I see this show up on my network for at least 1 host every interval. I've done sniffs at the time, and every single get request has a response in the sniff. I'd ordinarility post the sniffs, but they have our production SNMP community string in them. I've done several tests, and every time poller complains about a timeout, the sniff shows every get has a response.
FYI, this is the error I'm talking about (I'm running 216 hosts, 1 process, 10 threads per process, 10 requests max):
05/28/2010 09:45:15 PM - SPINE: Poller[0] Host[134] DS[2874] WARNING: SNMP timeout detected [500 ms], ignoring host '208.93.137.20'
05/28/2010 09:45:15 PM - SPINE: Poller[0] Host[134] DS[2873] WARNING: SNMP timeout detected [500 ms], ignoring host '208.93.137.20'
05/28/2010 09:45:15 PM - SPINE: Poller[0] Host[134] DS[2872] WARNING: SNMP timeout detected [500 ms], ignoring host '208.93.137.20'
05/28/2010 09:45:15 PM - SPINE: Poller[0] Host[134] DS[2871] WARNING: SNMP timeout detected [500 ms], ignoring host '208.93.137.20'
05/28/2010 09:45:15 PM - SPINE: Poller[0] Host[134] DS[2870] WARNING: SNMP timeout detected [500 ms], ignoring host '208.93.137.20'
05/28/2010 09:45:15 PM - SPINE: Poller[0] Host[134] DS[2869] WARNING: SNMP timeout detected [500 ms], ignoring host '208.93.137.20'
05/28/2010 09:45:15 PM - SPINE: Poller[0] Host[134] DS[2868] WARNING: SNMP timeout detected [500 ms], ignoring host '208.93.137.20'
05/28/2010 09:45:15 PM - SPINE: Poller[0] Host[134] DS[2094] WARNING: SNMP timeout detected [500 ms], ignoring host '208.93.137.20'
05/28/2010 09:45:15 PM - SPINE: Poller[0] Host[134] DS[2094] WARNING: SNMP timeout detected [500 ms], ignoring host '208.93.137.20'
05/28/2010 09:45:15 PM - SPINE: Poller[0] Host[134] DS[2093] WARNING: SNMP timeout detected [500 ms], ignoring host '208.93.137.20'
I'm a C/C++ developer, and will be happy to assist in debugging this with a developer.
SNMP timeout errors with SPINE
Moderators: Developers, Moderators
- TheWitness
- Developer
- Posts: 17007
- Joined: Tue May 14, 2002 5:08 pm
- Location: MI, USA
- Contact:
There are multiple reasons for this:
1) Device snmp community is wrong
2) SNMP timeout too low
3) Device Max OID's are too high causing longer time to gather data
4) SNMP Ping does not work correctly for the device.
Remediation steps:
1) Increase SNMP Timeout. For busy devices, I have had to go as high as 4 seconds.
2) Reduce Max OID's (remember if it's a WAN device aka high latency, this will slow polling).
TheWitness
1) Device snmp community is wrong
2) SNMP timeout too low
3) Device Max OID's are too high causing longer time to gather data
4) SNMP Ping does not work correctly for the device.
Remediation steps:
1) Increase SNMP Timeout. For busy devices, I have had to go as high as 4 seconds.
2) Reduce Max OID's (remember if it's a WAN device aka high latency, this will slow polling).
TheWitness
True understanding begins only when we realize how little we truly understand...
Life is an adventure, let yours begin with Cacti!
Author of dozens of Cacti plugins and customization's. Advocate of LAMP, MariaDB, IBM Spectrum LSF and the world of batch. Creator of IBM Spectrum RTM, author of quite a bit of unpublished work and most of Cacti's bugs.
_________________
Official Cacti Documentation
GitHub Repository with Supported Plugins
Percona Device Packages (no support)
Interesting Device Packages
For those wondering, I'm still here, but lost in the shadows. Yearning for less bugs. Who want's a Cacti 1.3/2.0? Streams anyone?
Life is an adventure, let yours begin with Cacti!
Author of dozens of Cacti plugins and customization's. Advocate of LAMP, MariaDB, IBM Spectrum LSF and the world of batch. Creator of IBM Spectrum RTM, author of quite a bit of unpublished work and most of Cacti's bugs.
_________________
Official Cacti Documentation
GitHub Repository with Supported Plugins
Percona Device Packages (no support)
Interesting Device Packages
For those wondering, I'm still here, but lost in the shadows. Yearning for less bugs. Who want's a Cacti 1.3/2.0? Streams anyone?
Re:
These settings have been in use before the errors started happening (both global setting and host setting) :TheWitness wrote: Remediation steps:
1) Increase SNMP Timeout. For busy devices, I have had to go as high as 4 seconds.
2) Reduce Max OID's (remember if it's a WAN device aka high latency, this will slow polling).
- SNMP timeout = 2000
- Max OID's = 1
Spine still shows :
Code: Select all
09/27/2010 09:36:56 AM - SPINE: Poller[0] Host[3370] DS[71096] WARNING: SNMP timeout detected [500 ms], ignoring host 'hostname'
- TheWitness
- Developer
- Posts: 17007
- Joined: Tue May 14, 2002 5:08 pm
- Location: MI, USA
- Contact:
Re: SNMP timeout errors with SPINE
That DS is likely wonkers.
TheWitness
TheWitness
True understanding begins only when we realize how little we truly understand...
Life is an adventure, let yours begin with Cacti!
Author of dozens of Cacti plugins and customization's. Advocate of LAMP, MariaDB, IBM Spectrum LSF and the world of batch. Creator of IBM Spectrum RTM, author of quite a bit of unpublished work and most of Cacti's bugs.
_________________
Official Cacti Documentation
GitHub Repository with Supported Plugins
Percona Device Packages (no support)
Interesting Device Packages
For those wondering, I'm still here, but lost in the shadows. Yearning for less bugs. Who want's a Cacti 1.3/2.0? Streams anyone?
Life is an adventure, let yours begin with Cacti!
Author of dozens of Cacti plugins and customization's. Advocate of LAMP, MariaDB, IBM Spectrum LSF and the world of batch. Creator of IBM Spectrum RTM, author of quite a bit of unpublished work and most of Cacti's bugs.
_________________
Official Cacti Documentation
GitHub Repository with Supported Plugins
Percona Device Packages (no support)
Interesting Device Packages
For those wondering, I'm still here, but lost in the shadows. Yearning for less bugs. Who want's a Cacti 1.3/2.0? Streams anyone?
Re: SNMP timeout errors with SPINE
As of today the errors stopped, without any human interaction. /shrug
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests