On our Cisco core's, there's lots of interfaces that are being monitored. I'd like to move the Port Channel interfaces to the first page so that I don't have to click on the last page of that host device in our Graph Tree to see that info.
It's easy to reorganize the Graph Tree, but I'm talking about the individual interface graphs.
So it's like:
Po1 Po2
Po3 Po4
Gi1/0/1 Gi 1/0/2
Gi1/0/3 Gi 1/0/4
Right now it defaults to all the FastEthernet interfaces, then Gig Ethernet Interfaces, then finally Port Channel interfaces.
Thanks, I might just be missing something stupid.
How do I move an interface graph, or reorder graphs?
Moderators: Developers, Moderators
The only way to do this currently is to manually add each graph to a subtree and use manual ordering. If you add just the 'device', you cannot use fine-grained controls for graph ordering, you can only choose to order by template or data query.
--
Live fast, die young
You're sucking up my bandwidth.
J.P. Pasnak,CD
CCNA, LPIC-1
http://www.warpedsystems.sk.ca
Live fast, die young
You're sucking up my bandwidth.
J.P. Pasnak,CD
CCNA, LPIC-1
http://www.warpedsystems.sk.ca
- gandalf
- Developer
- Posts: 22383
- Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2004 2:46 am
- Location: Muenster, Germany
- Contact:
Please see http://docs.cacti.net/manual:087:2_basi ... graph_tree for the sort orders available today
R.
R.
Thanks for the help. I was starting to think that was the only way.
I think what I'll end up doing is putting my favorite higher bandwidth graphs in it's own place in the graph tree. Then I can keep the Portchannel interfaces that are important to me near the top of the tree.
Would be cool to see a plugin or future update for some sorting options within the device. At least there are good workarounds for now.
I think what I'll end up doing is putting my favorite higher bandwidth graphs in it's own place in the graph tree. Then I can keep the Portchannel interfaces that are important to me near the top of the tree.
Would be cool to see a plugin or future update for some sorting options within the device. At least there are good workarounds for now.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests