Processor load OIDs changing by themselves in Windows
Moderators: Developers, Moderators
Processor load OIDs changing by themselves in Windows
I monitor Windows machines with the native SNMP service.
It seems that the OIDs for processor load don't follow any rule, they appear random. And what's worse they seem to change for no apparent reason and at random times between reboots.
Example: computer with 4 cores:
.iso.org.dod.internet.mgmt.mib-2.host.hrDevice.hrProcessorTable.hrProcessorEntry.hrProcessorLoad
.1.3.6.1.2.1.25.3.3.1.2
The OIDs for the four cores are:
hrProcessorLoad.2
hrProcessorLoad.3
hrProcessorLoad.4
hrProcessorLoad.5
I cannot understand why they don't start at 0 or at 1. What is this, 2 to 5? When I have first defined this host, they used to be 1 to 4, then at some point they changed.
I do CPU graphs for each core, like in the attachment. You see that only 3 cores are now there because of said random change of OIDs.
Is there a way I could define this so it doesn't matter what number Windows gives them?
Thanks
It seems that the OIDs for processor load don't follow any rule, they appear random. And what's worse they seem to change for no apparent reason and at random times between reboots.
Example: computer with 4 cores:
.iso.org.dod.internet.mgmt.mib-2.host.hrDevice.hrProcessorTable.hrProcessorEntry.hrProcessorLoad
.1.3.6.1.2.1.25.3.3.1.2
The OIDs for the four cores are:
hrProcessorLoad.2
hrProcessorLoad.3
hrProcessorLoad.4
hrProcessorLoad.5
I cannot understand why they don't start at 0 or at 1. What is this, 2 to 5? When I have first defined this host, they used to be 1 to 4, then at some point they changed.
I do CPU graphs for each core, like in the attachment. You see that only 3 cores are now there because of said random change of OIDs.
Is there a way I could define this so it doesn't matter what number Windows gives them?
Thanks
- Attachments
-
- Windows 2003 with 4 CPU
- atm.png (4.13 KiB) Viewed 5451 times
This is normal.
How are you collecting data from the hrProcessorLoad OIDs? Using cacti's snmp processor template, it should automatically reindex on the device reboot and should not be a problem if the numbers change.
What cacti version?
How are you collecting data from the hrProcessorLoad OIDs? Using cacti's snmp processor template, it should automatically reindex on the device reboot and should not be a problem if the numbers change.
What cacti version?
| Scripts: Monitor processes | RFC1213 MIB | DOCSIS Stats | Dell PowerEdge | Speedfan | APC UPS | DOCSIS CMTS | 3ware | Motorola Canopy |
| Guides: Windows Install | [HOWTO] Debug Windows NTFS permission problems |
| Tools: Windows All-in-one Installer |
Cacti 0.8.7e with patches
I define the datasources for each server manually, by browsing SNMP and using the OIDs that have the data. Then I put them all in a "stacked" graph.
I don't understand how the cacti's SNMP processor template is supposed to work for this. I tried it on a server and it could only do a graph for each core, and even that doesn't work. Those graphs have wrong data, see attachment.
I define the datasources for each server manually, by browsing SNMP and using the OIDs that have the data. Then I put them all in a "stacked" graph.
I don't understand how the cacti's SNMP processor template is supposed to work for this. I tried it on a server and it could only do a graph for each core, and even that doesn't work. Those graphs have wrong data, see attachment.
- Attachments
-
- This is supposed to be a processor graph
- wrong.png (3.02 KiB) Viewed 5409 times
This is the wrong way to do it. You should be using the cacti snmp processor template so it automatically reindexes the server on reboot (when OIDs can change).silviumc wrote:I define the datasources for each server manually, by browsing SNMP and using the OIDs that have the data.
1) you're still using rrdtool 1.0.x, why?Those graphs have wrong data, see attachment.
2) read what m means: http://forums.cacti.net/viewtopic.php?t=8168. is the server under heavy processor load?
| Scripts: Monitor processes | RFC1213 MIB | DOCSIS Stats | Dell PowerEdge | Speedfan | APC UPS | DOCSIS CMTS | 3ware | Motorola Canopy |
| Guides: Windows Install | [HOWTO] Debug Windows NTFS permission problems |
| Tools: Windows All-in-one Installer |
I realize that it's wrong, but I don't know how to get it to work right.This is the wrong way to do it. You should be using the cacti snmp processor template so it automatically reindexes the server on reboot (when OIDs can change).
Old SLES9 server. If there's an advantage in using a newer rrdtool, I'll compile one.1) you're still using rrdtool 1.0.x, why?
No, it isn't. Those are just plain wrong graphs. I know what "m" means, but it's just wrong data, wrong graph, wrong everything This is obtained with the CPU template from cacti. My problem is that I don't understand how this template is supposed to work.2) read what m means: http://forums.cacti.net/viewtopic.php?t=8168. is the server under heavy processor load?
time to learn.silviumc wrote: My problem is that I don't understand how this template is supposed to work.
1) read through http://docs.cacti.net/manual:087
2) The snmp processor template uses \cacti\resource\script_server\host_cpu.xml which then as you can see, invokes cacti\scripts\ss_host_cpu.php. Inside that file, you see it uses the following base OID: "index" => ".1.3.6.1.2.1.25.3.3.1"
3) as for 'wrong everything' read through http://docs.cacti.net/manual:087:4_help.2_debugging
| Scripts: Monitor processes | RFC1213 MIB | DOCSIS Stats | Dell PowerEdge | Speedfan | APC UPS | DOCSIS CMTS | 3ware | Motorola Canopy |
| Guides: Windows Install | [HOWTO] Debug Windows NTFS permission problems |
| Tools: Windows All-in-one Installer |
I appreciate you're trying to help me, but I'm not getting it! I have a few fundamental issues:2) The snmp processor template uses \cacti\resource\script_server\host_cpu.xml which then as you can see, invokes cacti\scripts\ss_host_cpu.php. Inside that file, you see it uses the following base OID: "index" => ".1.3.6.1.2.1.25.3.3.1"
1. Why doesn't it just work? Why doesn't Cacti have a template for Windows multiple CPU load that just works (like the one in the first picture I posted)? Is this such an uncommon graph? Nobody ever needed that until now or what?
2. Why does Windows move around those stupid OIDs? Is there a reason, other than to screw with the sysadmin?
1. You can create a multi-cpu graph, just have to use a different method. one must abstract out the specific OID each processor uses since they change. instead, you latch onto the cpu # since it doesn't change. Then once you have data sources tracking each cpu, you create an aggregate graph with all of the cpus. I strongly suggest the aggregate plugin for this otherwise you can do it manually, but it's painful.
2. I researched it a long time ago and sort of forget. think it was something about how windows updates which effect cpu / wmi / monitoring stuff can cause the internal indexes to get re-indexed which of course changes then numbers.
2. I researched it a long time ago and sort of forget. think it was something about how windows updates which effect cpu / wmi / monitoring stuff can cause the internal indexes to get re-indexed which of course changes then numbers.
| Scripts: Monitor processes | RFC1213 MIB | DOCSIS Stats | Dell PowerEdge | Speedfan | APC UPS | DOCSIS CMTS | 3ware | Motorola Canopy |
| Guides: Windows Install | [HOWTO] Debug Windows NTFS permission problems |
| Tools: Windows All-in-one Installer |
- TheWitness
- Developer
- Posts: 17007
- Joined: Tue May 14, 2002 5:08 pm
- Location: MI, USA
- Contact:
The index is the PID, which when a box is either rebooted, or the service restarted, changes.
Therefore, you have to be very careful how your re-index. Definitely don't want to do this with snmpV1.
TheWitness
Therefore, you have to be very careful how your re-index. Definitely don't want to do this with snmpV1.
TheWitness
True understanding begins only when we realize how little we truly understand...
Life is an adventure, let yours begin with Cacti!
Author of dozens of Cacti plugins and customization's. Advocate of LAMP, MariaDB, IBM Spectrum LSF and the world of batch. Creator of IBM Spectrum RTM, author of quite a bit of unpublished work and most of Cacti's bugs.
_________________
Official Cacti Documentation
GitHub Repository with Supported Plugins
Percona Device Packages (no support)
Interesting Device Packages
For those wondering, I'm still here, but lost in the shadows. Yearning for less bugs. Who want's a Cacti 1.3/2.0? Streams anyone?
Life is an adventure, let yours begin with Cacti!
Author of dozens of Cacti plugins and customization's. Advocate of LAMP, MariaDB, IBM Spectrum LSF and the world of batch. Creator of IBM Spectrum RTM, author of quite a bit of unpublished work and most of Cacti's bugs.
_________________
Official Cacti Documentation
GitHub Repository with Supported Plugins
Percona Device Packages (no support)
Interesting Device Packages
For those wondering, I'm still here, but lost in the shadows. Yearning for less bugs. Who want's a Cacti 1.3/2.0? Streams anyone?
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests