Graphs interface

Post general support questions here that do not specifically fall into the Linux or Windows categories.

Moderators: Developers, Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
brononi
Cacti User
Posts: 123
Joined: Tue Aug 29, 2006 1:58 am
Location: Belgium
Contact:

Graphs interface

Post by brononi »

I've got a strange issue... :oops:

Cacti is running for several months, and the cpu's of the routers/switches are nicely put into graphs.
But for one or the other reason, the graphs of the interfaces are stopped...

I've just removed a router, and added it back with the cpu/interface (these are nicely discovered btw).
But again only the cpu are made in graphs, the interfaces stay empty.

Any idea where it could go wrong?
User avatar
BSOD2600
Cacti Moderator
Posts: 12171
Joined: Sat May 08, 2004 12:44 pm
Location: USA

Post by BSOD2600 »

aurfalien
Posts: 30
Joined: Tue Nov 11, 2008 8:27 pm

Post by aurfalien »

Besides RTFMing, what do the logs say?

These are your best friend.

Also, I found that enabling graph debugging will help.
User avatar
brononi
Cacti User
Posts: 123
Joined: Tue Aug 29, 2006 1:58 am
Location: Belgium
Contact:

Post by brononi »

Sorry guys, nothing found in the manuals that could put me on the right track. :$

In what specific log should i check, and after what am i looking?


The strange thing is that the cpu usuage is working find, but no interface graphs...
Is there a difference between interface templates and cisco templates that could explain this?
User avatar
BSOD2600
Cacti Moderator
Posts: 12171
Joined: Sat May 08, 2004 12:44 pm
Location: USA

Post by BSOD2600 »

cacti.log with debugging logging will tell all what is going wrong... which that link I gave you documents ;).

Yes, there are differences, most likely the OIDs used, between the interface and cisco templates.
abc_lch
Posts: 1
Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2009 11:20 pm

Graphs showing 3rd line

Post by abc_lch »

My cacti graph of some locations is showing a 3rd line which is violet in color can i known what exactly is that.

I am attaching the same for more clarify.
Attachments
Cacti.JPG
Cacti.JPG (37.48 KiB) Viewed 3536 times
User avatar
brononi
Cacti User
Posts: 123
Joined: Tue Aug 29, 2006 1:58 am
Location: Belgium
Contact:

Post by brononi »

I see each time at the end of the first block: 'output: 0' ?
I don't know what this mean, or how i can change this...
Any hints?


Some snapshots

Code: Select all

10/6/2009 06:49:15 AM - CMDPHP: Poller[0] Host[22] DS[969] SNMP: v2: 10.128.56.254, dsname: traffic_out, oid: .1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.16.9, output: 0
10/06/2009 06:49:15 AM - CMDPHP: Poller[0] Host[50] DS[1549] SNMP: v2: 10.128.29.254, dsname: traffic_in, oid: .1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.10.16, output: 0
10/06/2009 06:49:15 AM - CMDPHP: Poller[0] Host[50] DS[1549] SNMP: v2: 10.128.29.254, dsname: traffic_out, oid: .1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.16.16, output: 0
10/06/2009 06:49:15 AM - CMDPHP: Poller[0] Host[22] DS[502] SNMP: v2: 10.128.56.254, dsname: traffic_in, oid: .1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.10.20, output: 2025206877
10/06/2009 06:49:15 AM - CMDPHP: Poller[0] Host[51] DS[1568] SNMP: v2: 10.128.34.254, dsname: traffic_out, oid: .1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.16.17, output: 0
10/06/2009 06:49:15 AM - CMDPHP: Poller[0] Host[51] DS[1569] SNMP: v2: 10.128.34.254, dsname: traffic_in, oid: .1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.10.20, output: 0
10/06/2009 06:49:15 AM - CMDPHP: Poller[0] Host[51] DS[1560] SNMP: v2: 10.128.34.254, dsname: traffic_in, oid: .1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.10.9, output: 0
10/06/2009 06:49:15 AM - CMDPHP: Poller[0] Host[51] DS[1568] SNMP: v2: 10.128.34.254, dsname: traffic_in, oid: .1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.10.17, output: 0
10/06/2009 06:49:15 AM - CMDPHP: Poller[0] Host[22] DS[969] SNMP: v2: 10.128.56.254, dsname: traffic_in, oid: .1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.10.9, output: 0
10/06/2009 06:49:15 AM 

Code: Select all

10/06/2009 06:49:44 AM - BOOST: Poller[0] NOTE: Updating Local Data Id:'1023'
10/06/2009 06:49:44 AM - BOOST: Poller[0] NOTE: Updating Local Data Id:'1025'
10/06/2009 06:49:44 AM - BOOST: Poller[0] NOTE: Updating Local Data Id:'1029'
10/06/2009 06:49:44 AM - BOOST: Poller[0] NOTE: Updating Local Data Id:'1032'
10/06/2009 06:49:47 AM - BOOST: Poller[0] NOTE: Updating Local Data Id:'1033'
10/06/2009 06:49:47 AM - BOOST: Poller[0] NOTE: Updating Local Data Id:'1034'
10/06/2009 06:49:47 AM - BOOST: Poller[0] NOTE: Updating Local Data Id:'1035'
10/06/2009 06:49:47 AM - BOOST: Poller[0] NOTE: Updating Local Data Id:'1043'
10/06/2009 06:49:47 AM - BOOST: Poller[0] NOTE: Updating Local Data Id:'1044'
10/06/2009 06:49:47 AM - BOOST: Poller[0] NOTE: Updating Local Data Id:'1045'
10/06/2009 06:49:47 AM - BOOST: Poller[0] NOTE: Updating Local Data Id:'1047'
10/06/2009 06:49:47 AM - BOOST: Poller[0] NOTE: Updating Local Data Id:'1050'
10/06/2009 06:49:47 AM - BOOST: Poller[0] NOTE: Updating Local Data Id:'1053'
10/06/2009 06:49:47 AM - BOOST: Poller[0] NOTE: Updating Local Data Id:'1054'
10/06/2009 06:49:47 AM - BOOST: Poller[0] NOTE: Updating Local Data Id:'1055'
10/06/2009 06:49:47 AM - BOOST: Poller[0] NOTE: Updating Local Data Id:'1056'
10/06/2009 06:49:47 AM - BOOST: Poller[0] NOTE: Updating Local Data Id:'1064'
10/06/2009 06:49:47 AM - BOOST: Poller[0] NOTE: Updating Local Data Id:'1065'
10/06/2009 06:49:47 AM - BOOST: Poller[0] NOTE: Updating Local Data Id:'1066'
10/06/2009 06:49:47 AM - BOOST: Poller[0] NOTE: Updating Local Data Id:'1068'
User avatar
brononi
Cacti User
Posts: 123
Joined: Tue Aug 29, 2006 1:58 am
Location: Belgium
Contact:

Post by brononi »

I think i'm going ...... nuts...... :evil:


To enable some logging in the cacti.log, i've selected some things in the general settings of the cacti.
For example:
-> General -> Event Logging -> Web RRD Graph Syntax: YES
-> General -> Poller Spefici Logging -> Poller logging level: Medium
-> General -> Poller Spefici Logging -> Poller Syslog -> Poller Warnings: YES
-> General -> Poller Spefici Logging -> Poller Syslog -> Poller Errors: YES

And now i see that the interface are starting to fill up.
I thought that the above things had only impact on the log file, not on the graph?
Any thought? Could this be the reason? :oops:
User avatar
BSOD2600
Cacti Moderator
Posts: 12171
Joined: Sat May 08, 2004 12:44 pm
Location: USA

Post by BSOD2600 »

brononi wrote:I see each time at the end of the first block: 'output: 0' ?
This means that the traffic interfaces are returning their counters as 0 aka no traffic flowed through it. This is then a problem with your device and not cacti.
User avatar
brononi
Cacti User
Posts: 123
Joined: Tue Aug 29, 2006 1:58 am
Location: Belgium
Contact:

Post by brononi »

The graphs are filling up again after the settings changes...
No idea why, i didn't changed anything on device / configsettings. Just the things above...

But it works, just some gaps in between, but that's another prob i think...
jiean
Posts: 5
Joined: Fri Oct 16, 2009 9:46 am

Post by jiean »

i have have this trouble too
anybody tell me what should i do will be appreciated

thanks
jiean
Posts: 5
Joined: Fri Oct 16, 2009 9:46 am

Re: Graphs interface

Post by jiean »

brononi wrote:I've got a strange issue... :oops:

Cacti is running for several months, and the cpu's of the routers/switches are nicely put into graphs.
But for one or the other reason, the graphs of the interfaces are stopped...

I've just removed a router, and added it back with the cpu/interface (these are nicely discovered btw).
But again only the cpu are made in graphs, the interfaces stay empty.

Any idea where it could go wrong?

can you tell me what should i do
User avatar
brononi
Cacti User
Posts: 123
Joined: Tue Aug 29, 2006 1:58 am
Location: Belgium
Contact:

Post by brononi »

I didn't find a solution.

I thought it was solved with changing the interface template, but it came back.

Maybe it's the amount of memory that's too low (700MB RAM)...
jiean
Posts: 5
Joined: Fri Oct 16, 2009 9:46 am

Post by jiean »

i have found the reason ,it just like this:
BSOD2600 wrote:
brononi wrote:I see each time at the end of the first block: 'output: 0' ?
This means that the traffic interfaces are returning their counters as 0 aka no traffic flowed through it. This is then a problem with your device and not cacti.
when i use "snmpwalk" to get the traffic of every port,it always return the same values each time . it should be increased
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests