Differece in Show interface and what is reported on Cacti

Post general support questions here that do not specifically fall into the Linux or Windows categories.

Moderators: Developers, Moderators

Post Reply
chuck.brantley
Posts: 1
Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2006 5:41 pm

Differece in Show interface and what is reported on Cacti

Post by chuck.brantley »

I am graphing interfaces with the bits/sec template. I have noticed the traffic that is reported does not match the show interface command input/output in bits per second.

I can manually pull the octets per second and convert to the correct bandwidth reported by the show interface command.

((octets per second)/polling interval) * 8 = bandwidth in bits per second

I have tried manipulating the CDEFs with mixed results.


I am not sure where the breakdown is in Cacti. I have never noticed before, so I am not sure if this is an issue with the version I am running or not.

I have downloaded the newest version of EZCacti and installed as a VM on a Windows XP desktop. This is used for testing at the moment.

Anyone have any ideas? Any help is appreciated.
User avatar
BSOD2600
Cacti Moderator
Posts: 12171
Joined: Sat May 08, 2004 12:44 pm
Location: USA

Post by BSOD2600 »

1) wrong forum.

2) please read the rrdtool section of the doc site and/or the rrdtool manual.
User avatar
gandalf
Developer
Posts: 22383
Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2004 2:46 am
Location: Muenster, Germany
Contact:

Post by gandalf »

When comparing traffic data of the device to Cacti, please make sure to take snapshots at quite exactly the same time as cacti does. Keep counter wraps in mind and subtract counters of different timestamps to get the correct amount of octets transferred. Then, apply bytes to bits and "per second" math.
Reinhard
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest