Hi Cacti community ,
I am using Cacti to graph several servers in my network and I need to develop a script which can report each time datas cannot be collected (resulting in a gap in the graph).
I have found two clues to detect these gaps :
> From the log file
> From the database directly
For the log file, i have put the logging level to debug/high and i haven't found anything consequent to determine if a gap is occuring.
For the database, i have found that if datas haven't been retrieved, the following query : "select * from poller_reindex where assert_value = 'U';" will show the different host_id where there was a problem. The value "U" means that the last value recovered is Unknown.
But still, i'm not sure if the result of my search are reliable.
So my question is : Do you know if there is a simple and reliable way to determine whenever Cacti cannot retrieve data from a specific host ?
Thank you in advance.
Detecting gap in graph
Moderators: Developers, Moderators
- TheWitness
- Developer
- Posts: 17007
- Joined: Tue May 14, 2002 5:08 pm
- Location: MI, USA
- Contact:
What version of Cacti?
True understanding begins only when we realize how little we truly understand...
Life is an adventure, let yours begin with Cacti!
Author of dozens of Cacti plugins and customization's. Advocate of LAMP, MariaDB, IBM Spectrum LSF and the world of batch. Creator of IBM Spectrum RTM, author of quite a bit of unpublished work and most of Cacti's bugs.
_________________
Official Cacti Documentation
GitHub Repository with Supported Plugins
Percona Device Packages (no support)
Interesting Device Packages
For those wondering, I'm still here, but lost in the shadows. Yearning for less bugs. Who want's a Cacti 1.3/2.0? Streams anyone?
Life is an adventure, let yours begin with Cacti!
Author of dozens of Cacti plugins and customization's. Advocate of LAMP, MariaDB, IBM Spectrum LSF and the world of batch. Creator of IBM Spectrum RTM, author of quite a bit of unpublished work and most of Cacti's bugs.
_________________
Official Cacti Documentation
GitHub Repository with Supported Plugins
Percona Device Packages (no support)
Interesting Device Packages
For those wondering, I'm still here, but lost in the shadows. Yearning for less bugs. Who want's a Cacti 1.3/2.0? Streams anyone?
- TheWitness
- Developer
- Posts: 17007
- Joined: Tue May 14, 2002 5:08 pm
- Location: MI, USA
- Contact:
Keep logging to LOW, and look for WARNING's in the Cacti Log.
TheWitness
TheWitness
True understanding begins only when we realize how little we truly understand...
Life is an adventure, let yours begin with Cacti!
Author of dozens of Cacti plugins and customization's. Advocate of LAMP, MariaDB, IBM Spectrum LSF and the world of batch. Creator of IBM Spectrum RTM, author of quite a bit of unpublished work and most of Cacti's bugs.
_________________
Official Cacti Documentation
GitHub Repository with Supported Plugins
Percona Device Packages (no support)
Interesting Device Packages
For those wondering, I'm still here, but lost in the shadows. Yearning for less bugs. Who want's a Cacti 1.3/2.0? Streams anyone?
Life is an adventure, let yours begin with Cacti!
Author of dozens of Cacti plugins and customization's. Advocate of LAMP, MariaDB, IBM Spectrum LSF and the world of batch. Creator of IBM Spectrum RTM, author of quite a bit of unpublished work and most of Cacti's bugs.
_________________
Official Cacti Documentation
GitHub Repository with Supported Plugins
Percona Device Packages (no support)
Interesting Device Packages
For those wondering, I'm still here, but lost in the shadows. Yearning for less bugs. Who want's a Cacti 1.3/2.0? Streams anyone?
I have done a test which consists to desactivate the SNMP service of a graphed server.
When the logging level is set to LOW, the log doesn't show any warning nor error.
However the graph of this server clearly show a gap.
I investigated in the log and the database, but the only place I have found which tell there is a gap is from the table poller_reindex.
Is this normal ? or can this phenomenon be caused by the "Downed Device Detection" option which is set to "Ping and SNMP" ?
Is there any other way to tell when there is a gap in the graph ?
When the logging level is set to LOW, the log doesn't show any warning nor error.
However the graph of this server clearly show a gap.
I investigated in the log and the database, but the only place I have found which tell there is a gap is from the table poller_reindex.
Is this normal ? or can this phenomenon be caused by the "Downed Device Detection" option which is set to "Ping and SNMP" ?
Is there any other way to tell when there is a gap in the graph ?
- TheWitness
- Developer
- Posts: 17007
- Joined: Tue May 14, 2002 5:08 pm
- Location: MI, USA
- Contact:
Set avail to SNMP
True understanding begins only when we realize how little we truly understand...
Life is an adventure, let yours begin with Cacti!
Author of dozens of Cacti plugins and customization's. Advocate of LAMP, MariaDB, IBM Spectrum LSF and the world of batch. Creator of IBM Spectrum RTM, author of quite a bit of unpublished work and most of Cacti's bugs.
_________________
Official Cacti Documentation
GitHub Repository with Supported Plugins
Percona Device Packages (no support)
Interesting Device Packages
For those wondering, I'm still here, but lost in the shadows. Yearning for less bugs. Who want's a Cacti 1.3/2.0? Streams anyone?
Life is an adventure, let yours begin with Cacti!
Author of dozens of Cacti plugins and customization's. Advocate of LAMP, MariaDB, IBM Spectrum LSF and the world of batch. Creator of IBM Spectrum RTM, author of quite a bit of unpublished work and most of Cacti's bugs.
_________________
Official Cacti Documentation
GitHub Repository with Supported Plugins
Percona Device Packages (no support)
Interesting Device Packages
For those wondering, I'm still here, but lost in the shadows. Yearning for less bugs. Who want's a Cacti 1.3/2.0? Streams anyone?
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests