Frontend/Central Server for Distributed Cacti Infrastructure

Anything that you think should be in Cacti.

Moderators: Developers, Moderators

Post Reply
chexhcky
Posts: 12
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2003 9:49 am
Location: Havertown, PA

Frontend/Central Server for Distributed Cacti Infrastructure

Post by chexhcky »

Not sure if you'd want to put a feature/package together to do this or leave this to the end users to create:

We have 9 cacti servers monitoring different markets. We built a page on another server to give users a central place to get to each market (a quick image map). Company users can authenticate via LDAP to MS AD.
We're looking at giving our customers access to their monitored elements. We were thinking of creating a page that passes authentication through to the responsible server based on a lookup of the customer's id. That way we can give a generic address to our customers, regardeless of where on the map they reside, knowing that the front server will connect them to the correct instance of Cacti.

Has there been any thought to a central server/single point of authentication/lookup to allow Cacti to run in a tiered architecture w/ multiple servers? Perhaps even add additional fields to the user information model to include some sort of tag for Internal/Partner/Customer identifier.

Thanks

jw
-----
Its not a penalty unless the ref sees it!
Tufqi
Posts: 3
Joined: Tue Mar 30, 2004 3:26 am

Cacti distribution

Post by Tufqi »

Are you sure you need a full fledged Cacti installation on each ?

I'd say the solution to your problem could be more to distribute the *poller* component of Cacti, and use a centralized database (with maybe several front-ends servers for load sharing purpose).

That way the only feature missing is just a mechanism for the cacti poller(s) to only pick a part of the polling targets.
chexhcky
Posts: 12
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2003 9:49 am
Location: Havertown, PA

Post by chexhcky »

Tufqi
You bring up a great point, but there is a limitation on the number of elements in a given level of the graph trees before some wackiness happens (http://www.raxnet.net/board/viewtopic.php?t=3242).

We're already hitting limits from the above, so we've got our elements across multiple servers. At some point we may even deploy the servers to their corresponding markets.

How would you expand the system to let the pollers know who each should poll? That would be a good enhancement to allow multiple pollers.
-----
Its not a penalty unless the ref sees it!
User avatar
TheWitness
Developer
Posts: 17007
Joined: Tue May 14, 2002 5:08 pm
Location: MI, USA
Contact:

Post by TheWitness »

What would be a good interum would be for users to have permissions to only a subset of tree branches. This would then allow you to maintain the single server approach. This is pass one. There will come a point when the backend RRDGraph process will hit the wall on a given server.

Therefore, from a scalability perspective, two things have to happen:

1) Capability to poll from servers other than the database/web
2) Capability to distribute the RRDGraph and WebServer Operations
3) Capability to separate web from database.

I believe that 3) is already in place. Ian and I are working on 1) from a production perspective (many have done this independently) and 2) I haven't even thought about and really wouldn't know where to begin.

From the user having access to only specific tree branches, to rough in would be quite easy, to insure that integration is complete (aka what happens when you rename/delete/reorganize a tree) will take more time.

TheWitness
True understanding begins only when we realize how little we truly understand...

Life is an adventure, let yours begin with Cacti!

Author of dozens of Cacti plugins and customization's. Advocate of LAMP, MariaDB, IBM Spectrum LSF and the world of batch. Creator of IBM Spectrum RTM, author of quite a bit of unpublished work and most of Cacti's bugs.
_________________
Official Cacti Documentation
GitHub Repository with Supported Plugins
Percona Device Packages (no support)
Interesting Device Packages


For those wondering, I'm still here, but lost in the shadows. Yearning for less bugs. Who want's a Cacti 1.3/2.0? Streams anyone?
Mika
Cacti User
Posts: 64
Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2004 3:01 am

Post by Mika »

Sorry if this question is discussed already but I didn't find anywhere.
How can I make work seperate web and database, I mean can I do and how can I do web application on one server and running database with polling on another?
User avatar
TheWitness
Developer
Posts: 17007
Joined: Tue May 14, 2002 5:08 pm
Location: MI, USA
Contact:

Post by TheWitness »

Mika,

We will be supporting a mult/distributed poller officially in 0.8.7. Please stay tuned. Until then, 0.8.6 provides a significant boost to performance and will be released in the next few weeks.

The database can currently be hosted on another server. To do this, you must edit the following file <cacti_root>/include/config.php and change the appropriate lines in the file. Please see below:

$database_type = "mysql"; // your database type (don't know if others are supported)
$database_default = "cacti"; // your database name
$database_hostname = "localhost"; // your databases server
$database_username = "cactiuser"; // your database ID
$database_password = "cactil"; // your database password

Regards,

TheWitness
True understanding begins only when we realize how little we truly understand...

Life is an adventure, let yours begin with Cacti!

Author of dozens of Cacti plugins and customization's. Advocate of LAMP, MariaDB, IBM Spectrum LSF and the world of batch. Creator of IBM Spectrum RTM, author of quite a bit of unpublished work and most of Cacti's bugs.
_________________
Official Cacti Documentation
GitHub Repository with Supported Plugins
Percona Device Packages (no support)
Interesting Device Packages


For those wondering, I'm still here, but lost in the shadows. Yearning for less bugs. Who want's a Cacti 1.3/2.0? Streams anyone?
Mika
Cacti User
Posts: 64
Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2004 3:01 am

Post by Mika »

TheWitness,

In your described situation it would be only sql database seperated from rest of cacti aplication but I'd like to make web seperated from rest of cacti application.
I mean, I'd like to make web stuff on one server and polling stuff on other or even few others servers.
Am I right, that distributed poller will fulfill my expectations?


Thanks in advance,
Mika
User avatar
TheWitness
Developer
Posts: 17007
Joined: Tue May 14, 2002 5:08 pm
Location: MI, USA
Contact:

Post by TheWitness »

Yes, because the poller can reside on separate distinct servers and not neccesarily the web server. You might even be able to "hack" it in today.

Understanding the code, I would have no problem making the change.

TheWitness
True understanding begins only when we realize how little we truly understand...

Life is an adventure, let yours begin with Cacti!

Author of dozens of Cacti plugins and customization's. Advocate of LAMP, MariaDB, IBM Spectrum LSF and the world of batch. Creator of IBM Spectrum RTM, author of quite a bit of unpublished work and most of Cacti's bugs.
_________________
Official Cacti Documentation
GitHub Repository with Supported Plugins
Percona Device Packages (no support)
Interesting Device Packages


For those wondering, I'm still here, but lost in the shadows. Yearning for less bugs. Who want's a Cacti 1.3/2.0? Streams anyone?
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests