[SOLVED] Better Linux memory usage graphs ?

Jem · Post by **Jem** » Mon Dec 10, 2007 11:23 am

Applying this patch solved my problem too

Thanks !

Chaosratt · Post by **Chaosratt** » Sat Feb 16, 2008 9:27 pm

Having the same issue on a fresh install of 0.8.7b using Suse 10.3

xaos@pandora:~> cat /proc/meminfo
MemTotal:       450896 kB
MemFree:          5184 kB
Buffers:          1372 kB
Cached:         316332 kB
SwapCached:          0 kB
Active:         137228 kB
Inactive:       280220 kB
HighTotal:           0 kB
HighFree:            0 kB
LowTotal:       450896 kB
LowFree:          5184 kB
SwapTotal:     2096472 kB
SwapFree:      2096364 kB
Dirty:           20188 kB
Writeback:           0 kB
AnonPages:       99828 kB
Mapped:          36756 kB
Slab:            14820 kB
SReclaimable:     7788 kB
SUnreclaim:       7032 kB
PageTables:       1264 kB
NFS_Unstable:        0 kB
Bounce:              0 kB
CommitLimit:   2321920 kB
Committed_AS:   383484 kB
VmallocTotal:   573432 kB
VmallocUsed:     10656 kB
VmallocChunk:   561012 kB
HugePages_Total:     0
HugePages_Free:      0
HugePages_Rsvd:      0
Hugepagesize:     4096 kB

Code: Select all

xaos@pandora:~> snmpwalk -v 1 -c public localhost memory
UCD-SNMP-MIB::memIndex.0 = INTEGER: 0
UCD-SNMP-MIB::memErrorName.0 = STRING: swap
UCD-SNMP-MIB::memTotalSwap.0 = INTEGER: 2096472 kB
UCD-SNMP-MIB::memAvailSwap.0 = INTEGER: 2096364 kB
UCD-SNMP-MIB::memTotalReal.0 = INTEGER: 450896 kB
UCD-SNMP-MIB::memAvailReal.0 = INTEGER: 5628 kB
UCD-SNMP-MIB::memTotalFree.0 = INTEGER: 2101992 kB
UCD-SNMP-MIB::memMinimumSwap.0 = INTEGER: 16000 kB
UCD-SNMP-MIB::memShared.0 = INTEGER: 0 kB
UCD-SNMP-MIB::memBuffer.0 = INTEGER: 1792 kB
UCD-SNMP-MIB::memCached.0 = INTEGER: 314868 kB
UCD-SNMP-MIB::memSwapError.0 = INTEGER: noError(0)
UCD-SNMP-MIB::memSwapErrorMsg.0 = STRING:

JFDionne · Post by **JFDionne** » Sun Feb 17, 2008 12:08 am

I'm having the same problem with 0.8.7b too

redcap · Post by **redcap** » Sun Feb 17, 2008 7:01 am

I can confirm this too after upgrading to 0.8.7b on Debian.

fmangeant · Post by **fmangeant** » Tue Feb 19, 2008 3:26 am

Hi

I've opened bug #1187

Chaosratt · Post by **Chaosratt** » Sun Mar 16, 2008 4:42 pm

So no progress has been made on this then?

John Gilik · Post by **John Gilik** » Thu Apr 17, 2008 2:27 pm

Here is an updated XML file with CDEFs that are correct for 0.8.7b, as far as I can tell. Previously, the "Memory Used" value was coming from a CDEF that was taking (d-c-b-a)*1024. Now, it's doing (g-e-c-a)*1024.

For whatever reason, it seems that (in Cacti 0.8.7b, at least,) each data source has two letters assigned to it as far as the CDEFs go--a and b both refer to Memory Buffers, c and d both refer to Memory Cached, e and f both refer to Memory Free, and g and h both refer to Memory Total.

I hope this helps.

redcap · Post by **redcap** » Fri Apr 18, 2008 7:34 am

Hi John,

I imoprted the new template but my graphs still look the same

Steven

fmangeant · Post by **fmangeant** » Fri Apr 18, 2008 7:39 am

Hi

this has been corrected (see the link in my signature).

tdbabar · Post by **tdbabar** » Wed Jun 25, 2008 9:52 am

This one did not work for me...
The current memory values are in minus (-).

I had imported older template before using this one... is that an issue???
how to get it work?

tdbabar · Post by **tdbabar** » Wed Jun 25, 2008 10:45 am

Is this working for someone?

liung · Post by **liung** » Tue Feb 17, 2009 8:46 pm

Here is my graph , there is also something wrong ~~~

liung · Post by **liung** » Tue Jun 23, 2009 4:35 am

I updated cacti from 0.87b to 0.87d , this template's CDEF comes out wrong , how can I fixed this ?
Thanks.

sblantipodi · Post by **sblantipodi** » Fri Aug 05, 2011 8:23 pm

how can I get the memory usage template working on a SNMP enabled host?

Cacti

[SOLVED] Better Linux memory usage graphs ?

Re: [SOLVED] Better Linux memory usage graphs ?

Who is online