Any help regarding this would be greatly appreciated. I think this should be easy if I owned the switches, but the colocation facility owns the switches.
How can I make cacti graph bandwidth info for multiple servers? Here's what I want to do and explain what cacti can do.
I need it to create bandwidth usage graphs where it would grab the info from SNMP from the switches managed by the colocation facility. The software would need to ONLY be installed on server #1. Each dedicated server client would have their own login to server#1 to see their own dedicated server's bandwidth usage graphs. I don't want any software installed on client servers like SNMPd. I only want it installed on Server#1. I want the software to read from the SNMP from the colocation facility's owned switches.
Thank you.
Multiple Servers / SNMP from Switches
Moderators: Developers, Moderators
- TheWitness
- Developer
- Posts: 17007
- Joined: Tue May 14, 2002 5:08 pm
- Location: MI, USA
- Contact:
Aggregate Plugin.
TheWitness
TheWitness
True understanding begins only when we realize how little we truly understand...
Life is an adventure, let yours begin with Cacti!
Author of dozens of Cacti plugins and customization's. Advocate of LAMP, MariaDB, IBM Spectrum LSF and the world of batch. Creator of IBM Spectrum RTM, author of quite a bit of unpublished work and most of Cacti's bugs.
_________________
Official Cacti Documentation
GitHub Repository with Supported Plugins
Percona Device Packages (no support)
Interesting Device Packages
For those wondering, I'm still here, but lost in the shadows. Yearning for less bugs. Who want's a Cacti 1.3/2.0? Streams anyone?
Life is an adventure, let yours begin with Cacti!
Author of dozens of Cacti plugins and customization's. Advocate of LAMP, MariaDB, IBM Spectrum LSF and the world of batch. Creator of IBM Spectrum RTM, author of quite a bit of unpublished work and most of Cacti's bugs.
_________________
Official Cacti Documentation
GitHub Repository with Supported Plugins
Percona Device Packages (no support)
Interesting Device Packages
For those wondering, I'm still here, but lost in the shadows. Yearning for less bugs. Who want's a Cacti 1.3/2.0? Streams anyone?
gandalf, thank you for letting me know about the discussion list post, since I hadn't received the email. I had to visit the discussion list online archive to see the message.
For client servers, if they purchased from us a managed server, we would have no problem just installing cacti or MRTG on each server since we'd have access to it and would be the administrator of the server (they have root access if they want it though) to get the bandwidth usage on each server. Then give the client a login to view their bandwidth graphs for their server.
But with unmanaged dedicated servers, I was hoping to find a method of not installing any software on the client server since they would A). not like that, B). would mess with it, C). they could possibly modify it so the bandwidth graph is not accurate since this would be based on their monthly billing. For dedicated servers we bill per GB rather then per MB, but either way the graph is needed for accurate monthly billing. Do you guys have any alternative ideas?
ok, I see. Basically this would be easier if I owned the switches, but since I don't it would be tougher. Even if I owned the switches, I would have to figure out which switch port corresponds with which server. And each would make separate graphs.If you have SNMP read access to the switches, this is doable.
But it is a task to relate all switch ports to the related servers and to
provide access to those graphs only, that relate to servers of each respective
client.
All this can be done with cacti
For client servers, if they purchased from us a managed server, we would have no problem just installing cacti or MRTG on each server since we'd have access to it and would be the administrator of the server (they have root access if they want it though) to get the bandwidth usage on each server. Then give the client a login to view their bandwidth graphs for their server.
But with unmanaged dedicated servers, I was hoping to find a method of not installing any software on the client server since they would A). not like that, B). would mess with it, C). they could possibly modify it so the bandwidth graph is not accurate since this would be based on their monthly billing. For dedicated servers we bill per GB rather then per MB, but either way the graph is needed for accurate monthly billing. Do you guys have any alternative ideas?
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests