be more flexable with oid/regex output in XML files
Moderators: Developers, Moderators
be more flexable with oid/regex output in XML files
I have seen several MIB's where an index is used to point to other locations in the mib with a little extension (of 2 numbers)
example: (juniper mib)
.1.3.6.1.4.1.2636.5.1.1.2.1.1.1.14.<index>.<peer_index_#>
and now you have to use <index> on the info you want but now with an addition of 2 numbers
like:
.1.3.6.1.4.1.2636.5.1.1.2.6.2.1.7.<peer_index_#>.1.1
.1.3.6.1.4.1.2636.5.1.1.2.6.2.1.8.<peer_index_#>.1.1
.1.3.6.1.4.1.2636.5.1.1.2.6.2.1.9.<peer_index_#>.1.1
.1.3.6.1.4.1.2636.5.1.1.2.6.2.1.10.<peer_index_#>.1.1
if we could use back references from regex in XML like this:
<interface>
<name>Juniper - BGP Peer Prefix Stats</name>
<oid_index>.1.3.6.1.4.1.2636.5.1.1.2.1.1.1.14</oid_index>
<oid_index_parse>OID/REGEXP:.*\.([0-9]{1,3}\.[0-9]{1,3}\.[0-9]{1,3}\.[0-9]{1,3})\.1\.([0-9]{1,3}\.[0-9]{1,3}\.[0-9]{1,3}\.[0-9]{1,3})\.([0-9]{1,2})$</oid_index_parse>
<index_order>Index</index_order>
<index_order_type>numeric</index_order_type>
<index_title_format>|chosen_order_field|</index_title_format>
<fields>
<Index>
<name>Index</name>
<method>walk</method>
<source>value</source>
<direction>input</direction>
<oid>.1.3.6.1.4.1.2636.5.1.1.2.6.2.1</oid>
</Index>
<jnxBgpM2PrefixInPrefixes>
<name>Prefixes In</name>
<method>walk</method>
<source>value</source>
<direction>output</direction>
<oid>.1.3.6.1.4.1.2636.5.1.1.2.6.2.1.7.$3.1.1</oid>
</jnxBgpM2PrefixInPrefixes>
<jnxBgpM2PrefixInPrefixesAccepted>
<name>Accepted Prefixes</name>
<method>walk</method>
<source>value</source>
<direction>output</direction>
<oid>.1.3.6.1.4.1.2636.5.1.1.2.6.2.1.8.$3.1.1</oid>
</jnxBgpM2PrefixInPrefixesAccepted>
<jnxBgpM2PrefixOutPrefixes>
<name>Outbound Prefixes</name>
<method>walk</method>
<source>value</source>
<direction>output</direction>
<oid>.1.3.6.1.4.1.2636.5.1.1.2.6.2.1.10.$3.1.1</oid>
</jnxBgpM2PrefixOutPrefixes>
</fields>
</interface>
I do not have to do this in a seperate perl script...
and the Centillion MIB has the same problem -- so I think it's more common....
example: (juniper mib)
.1.3.6.1.4.1.2636.5.1.1.2.1.1.1.14.<index>.<peer_index_#>
and now you have to use <index> on the info you want but now with an addition of 2 numbers
like:
.1.3.6.1.4.1.2636.5.1.1.2.6.2.1.7.<peer_index_#>.1.1
.1.3.6.1.4.1.2636.5.1.1.2.6.2.1.8.<peer_index_#>.1.1
.1.3.6.1.4.1.2636.5.1.1.2.6.2.1.9.<peer_index_#>.1.1
.1.3.6.1.4.1.2636.5.1.1.2.6.2.1.10.<peer_index_#>.1.1
if we could use back references from regex in XML like this:
<interface>
<name>Juniper - BGP Peer Prefix Stats</name>
<oid_index>.1.3.6.1.4.1.2636.5.1.1.2.1.1.1.14</oid_index>
<oid_index_parse>OID/REGEXP:.*\.([0-9]{1,3}\.[0-9]{1,3}\.[0-9]{1,3}\.[0-9]{1,3})\.1\.([0-9]{1,3}\.[0-9]{1,3}\.[0-9]{1,3}\.[0-9]{1,3})\.([0-9]{1,2})$</oid_index_parse>
<index_order>Index</index_order>
<index_order_type>numeric</index_order_type>
<index_title_format>|chosen_order_field|</index_title_format>
<fields>
<Index>
<name>Index</name>
<method>walk</method>
<source>value</source>
<direction>input</direction>
<oid>.1.3.6.1.4.1.2636.5.1.1.2.6.2.1</oid>
</Index>
<jnxBgpM2PrefixInPrefixes>
<name>Prefixes In</name>
<method>walk</method>
<source>value</source>
<direction>output</direction>
<oid>.1.3.6.1.4.1.2636.5.1.1.2.6.2.1.7.$3.1.1</oid>
</jnxBgpM2PrefixInPrefixes>
<jnxBgpM2PrefixInPrefixesAccepted>
<name>Accepted Prefixes</name>
<method>walk</method>
<source>value</source>
<direction>output</direction>
<oid>.1.3.6.1.4.1.2636.5.1.1.2.6.2.1.8.$3.1.1</oid>
</jnxBgpM2PrefixInPrefixesAccepted>
<jnxBgpM2PrefixOutPrefixes>
<name>Outbound Prefixes</name>
<method>walk</method>
<source>value</source>
<direction>output</direction>
<oid>.1.3.6.1.4.1.2636.5.1.1.2.6.2.1.10.$3.1.1</oid>
</jnxBgpM2PrefixOutPrefixes>
</fields>
</interface>
I do not have to do this in a seperate perl script...
and the Centillion MIB has the same problem -- so I think it's more common....
Hi sodium!
That's one of the features that I requested in 'Improve the "power" of REGEXPs in Data Queries' (http://forums.cacti.net/viewtopic.php?t=13949)!
(No answer until now...)
Still waiting...
(And sorry for my poor English...)
That's one of the features that I requested in 'Improve the "power" of REGEXPs in Data Queries' (http://forums.cacti.net/viewtopic.php?t=13949)!
(No answer until now...)
Still waiting...
(And sorry for my poor English...)
Thanks in advance!
(And sorry for my poor English...)
_______________________________________
twelzy (Enio Sanches)
(And sorry for my poor English...)
_______________________________________
twelzy (Enio Sanches)
- rony
- Developer/Forum Admin
- Posts: 6022
- Joined: Mon Nov 17, 2003 6:35 pm
- Location: Michigan, USA
- Contact:
I don't know how we can make it "better", as we are using the regex functions that PHP provides.
[size=117][i][b]Tony Roman[/b][/i][/size]
[size=84][i]Experience is what causes a person to make new mistakes instead of old ones.[/i][/size]
[size=84][i]There are only 3 way to complete a project: Good, Fast or Cheap, pick two.[/i][/size]
[size=84][i]With age comes wisdom, what you choose to do with it determines whether or not you are wise.[/i][/size]
[size=84][i]Experience is what causes a person to make new mistakes instead of old ones.[/i][/size]
[size=84][i]There are only 3 way to complete a project: Good, Fast or Cheap, pick two.[/i][/size]
[size=84][i]With age comes wisdom, what you choose to do with it determines whether or not you are wise.[/i][/size]
to implement this:rony wrote:I don't know how we can make it "better", as we are using the regex functions that PHP provides.
<oid>.1.3.6.1.4.1.2636.5.1.1.2.6.2.1.10.$regs[3].1.1</oid>
it's simple regex 'back reference' stuff (it's available in PHP see http://nl2.php.net/manual/en/ref.regex.php )
- rony
- Developer/Forum Admin
- Posts: 6022
- Joined: Mon Nov 17, 2003 6:35 pm
- Location: Michigan, USA
- Contact:
Without looking at the source code, I don't recall what it uses..danbeck wrote:How about using the preg functions instead of POSIX only?rony wrote:I don't know how we can make it "better", as we are using the regex functions that PHP provides.
[size=117][i][b]Tony Roman[/b][/i][/size]
[size=84][i]Experience is what causes a person to make new mistakes instead of old ones.[/i][/size]
[size=84][i]There are only 3 way to complete a project: Good, Fast or Cheap, pick two.[/i][/size]
[size=84][i]With age comes wisdom, what you choose to do with it determines whether or not you are wise.[/i][/size]
[size=84][i]Experience is what causes a person to make new mistakes instead of old ones.[/i][/size]
[size=84][i]There are only 3 way to complete a project: Good, Fast or Cheap, pick two.[/i][/size]
[size=84][i]With age comes wisdom, what you choose to do with it determines whether or not you are wise.[/i][/size]
Hi sodium, rony and danbeck,
The actual regexp functions used in <CACTI_PATH>/lib/data_query.php file are POSIX Regular Expressions.
I think that both POSIX Regular Expressions functions and PCRE (Perl-Compatible Regular Expression) functions could resolve this issue.
The problem here is that with the actual <CACTI_PATH>/lib/data_query.php file we can't do:
rony, if you need some help to write/test the code I can dedicate some of my time to this task.
Thanks in advance!
(And sorry for my poor English...)
The actual regexp functions used in <CACTI_PATH>/lib/data_query.php file are POSIX Regular Expressions.
I think that both POSIX Regular Expressions functions and PCRE (Perl-Compatible Regular Expression) functions could resolve this issue.
The problem here is that with the actual <CACTI_PATH>/lib/data_query.php file we can't do:
- - "VALUE/REGEXP" in the <oid_index_parse> field, with the possibility to match more than one value and use these values in the <source> field;
- "VALUE/REGEXP" in the <source> field, with the possibility to match and use these values;
- "VALUE/REGEXP_REPLACE" in the <source> field, with the possibility to match and replace more than one value.
I'm not a PHP expert. I have 6 years of experience in shell scripting. Now I'm studing PHP to convert my shell scripts to PHP scripts.Example: Internet Links in our Border Routers
We have 2 kinds of agreements in our Internet Links: transit and peering links.
And we classify these links in 2 categories: national and international links.
These classifications are shortened in the ifAlias as following:
(TRANS|PEER)_(NAC|INTL)_.*
We have here 2 input fields: AGGREMENT and NATIONALITY.
So we need to match and replace:
TRANS by Transit, in the AGGREMENT input field;
PEER by Peering, in the AGGREMENT input field;
NAC by National, in the NATIONALITY input field;
INTL by International, in the NATIONALITY input field,
respectively!
In this case, we need a "VALUE/REGEXP_REPLACE" in the <source> field, with the possibility to match and replace more than one value!
And if we want to make a Data/Graph template that will list only these Internet links of our Border Routers, we need a "VALUE/REGEXP" in the <oid_index_parse> field, that matches only the ifAlias that begin with (TRANS|PEER)!
rony, if you need some help to write/test the code I can dedicate some of my time to this task.
Thanks in advance!
(And sorry for my poor English...)
Thanks in advance!
(And sorry for my poor English...)
_______________________________________
twelzy (Enio Sanches)
(And sorry for my poor English...)
_______________________________________
twelzy (Enio Sanches)
- TheWitness
- Developer
- Posts: 17047
- Joined: Tue May 14, 2002 5:08 pm
- Location: MI, USA
- Contact:
It's just that the developers are indisposed at the moment. I can't seem to get any time for Cacti lately. I hope that changes soon....
TheWitness
TheWitness
True understanding begins only when we realize how little we truly understand...
Life is an adventure, let yours begin with Cacti!
Author of dozens of Cacti plugins and customization's. Advocate of LAMP, MariaDB, IBM Spectrum LSF and the world of batch. Creator of IBM Spectrum RTM, author of quite a bit of unpublished work and most of Cacti's bugs.
_________________
Official Cacti Documentation
GitHub Repository with Supported Plugins
Percona Device Packages (no support)
Interesting Device Packages
For those wondering, I'm still here, but lost in the shadows. Yearning for less bugs. Who want's a Cacti 1.3/2.0? Streams anyone?
Life is an adventure, let yours begin with Cacti!
Author of dozens of Cacti plugins and customization's. Advocate of LAMP, MariaDB, IBM Spectrum LSF and the world of batch. Creator of IBM Spectrum RTM, author of quite a bit of unpublished work and most of Cacti's bugs.
_________________
Official Cacti Documentation
GitHub Repository with Supported Plugins
Percona Device Packages (no support)
Interesting Device Packages
For those wondering, I'm still here, but lost in the shadows. Yearning for less bugs. Who want's a Cacti 1.3/2.0? Streams anyone?
-
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2007 4:24 am
Hi! I also asked for a feature like that in
http://forums.cacti.net/viewtopic.php?t=22586
I use Cacti with Cisco routers and I would greatly benefit from a feature which would let me use a suffix for some OIDs (see my original post for an example).
http://forums.cacti.net/viewtopic.php?t=22586
I use Cacti with Cisco routers and I would greatly benefit from a feature which would let me use a suffix for some OIDs (see my original post for an example).
I could use this feature as well. I'm finding this to be a common issue with many Cisco OIDs and would imagine its the same for other vendors MIBs as well.
For example I'm trying to poll frame-relay statistics and my indexes are:
14.100
14.200
19.100
19.200
Then I poll a bunch of OIDs and one of my OIDs adds a .1 to the end so I can't poll that particular OID.
14.100.1
14.200.1
19.100.1
19.200.1
I'm finding this more of an issue when I try to reference another OID for a descriptive information. I'm new to regex though. Can I do a regex to ignore the .1 if it exists, but to still work if it doesn't have a .1?
Thanks,
sh0x
For example I'm trying to poll frame-relay statistics and my indexes are:
14.100
14.200
19.100
19.200
Then I poll a bunch of OIDs and one of my OIDs adds a .1 to the end so I can't poll that particular OID.
14.100.1
14.200.1
19.100.1
19.200.1
I'm finding this more of an issue when I try to reference another OID for a descriptive information. I'm new to regex though. Can I do a regex to ignore the .1 if it exists, but to still work if it doesn't have a .1?
Thanks,
sh0x
Hi,
I am having the same issue as the original poster in that the OID I want use has a suffix to the index
http://forums.cacti.net/viewtopic.php?t=23596 is where I posted my original issue, any idea if this will get fixed as a lot of our new network equipment (Juniper & Foundry) use these sort of OID's.
Syngess
I am having the same issue as the original poster in that the OID I want use has a suffix to the index
http://forums.cacti.net/viewtopic.php?t=23596 is where I posted my original issue, any idea if this will get fixed as a lot of our new network equipment (Juniper & Foundry) use these sort of OID's.
Syngess
also requesting this feature, we have quite a few pieces of hardware (Cisco routers, MetaSwitch softswitch) where the developers have suffixed an OID, instead of prefixing into a table like they should have...
Anyone have a workaround/patch for this? We only have a single digit to deal with on the end (.1 = current 5 mins, .2 = prev 5 mins, .3 = current 15 mins, etc), my cacti-fu is weak though, unless it's hacking together composite bandwidth graphs...
Sample of snmpwalk output of the OID's I'm trying to graph:
1.7.100.101.102.97.117.108.116.1.1.1 is the index, grabbed from a different portion of the MIB.
Anyone have a workaround/patch for this? We only have a single digit to deal with on the end (.1 = current 5 mins, .2 = prev 5 mins, .3 = current 15 mins, etc), my cacti-fu is weak though, unless it's hacking together composite bandwidth graphs...
Sample of snmpwalk output of the OID's I'm trying to graph:
Code: Select all
$ grep '.1.1.1.1 = ' isupdeststatisticswalk.txt
METASWITCH-MIB::iSUPRemSigDestStatsNumCircsCfgd.1.7.100.101.102.97.117.108.116.1.1.1.1 = Gauge32: 432
METASWITCH-MIB::iSUPRemSigDestStatsNumCircsAvail.1.7.100.101.102.97.117.108.116.1.1.1.1 = Gauge32: 432
METASWITCH-MIB::iSUPRemSigDestStatsNumCircsInUse.1.7.100.101.102.97.117.108.116.1.1.1.1 = Gauge32: 108
- TheWitness
- Developer
- Posts: 17047
- Joined: Tue May 14, 2002 5:08 pm
- Location: MI, USA
- Contact:
Does anyone have a patch? It won't make it into Saturday's release, but...
TheWitness
TheWitness
True understanding begins only when we realize how little we truly understand...
Life is an adventure, let yours begin with Cacti!
Author of dozens of Cacti plugins and customization's. Advocate of LAMP, MariaDB, IBM Spectrum LSF and the world of batch. Creator of IBM Spectrum RTM, author of quite a bit of unpublished work and most of Cacti's bugs.
_________________
Official Cacti Documentation
GitHub Repository with Supported Plugins
Percona Device Packages (no support)
Interesting Device Packages
For those wondering, I'm still here, but lost in the shadows. Yearning for less bugs. Who want's a Cacti 1.3/2.0? Streams anyone?
Life is an adventure, let yours begin with Cacti!
Author of dozens of Cacti plugins and customization's. Advocate of LAMP, MariaDB, IBM Spectrum LSF and the world of batch. Creator of IBM Spectrum RTM, author of quite a bit of unpublished work and most of Cacti's bugs.
_________________
Official Cacti Documentation
GitHub Repository with Supported Plugins
Percona Device Packages (no support)
Interesting Device Packages
For those wondering, I'm still here, but lost in the shadows. Yearning for less bugs. Who want's a Cacti 1.3/2.0? Streams anyone?
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests