Ad blocker detected: Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors. Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker on our website.
Search found 4 matches
Go to advanced search
- by WGPavell
- Mon Dec 23, 2019 1:09 am
- Forum: Help: General
- Topic: Holes in graphs
- Replies: 6
- Views: 1419
cigamit wrote: ↑Sun Dec 22, 2019 9:36 pm
What Cacti version are you using?
1.1.19
cigamit wrote: ↑Sun Dec 22, 2019 9:36 pm
Did you change the logging? if So, then all results should be in there. Depending on the Cacti version, you may have to search by data source ID.
I see some other DS but don't see DS for my graph.
- by WGPavell
- Sun Dec 22, 2019 4:05 am
- Forum: Help: General
- Topic: Holes in graphs
- Replies: 6
- Views: 1419
the not-NaN values are near to 2^31 (maximum signed 32-bit integer), and no value is bigger than 2^31, so it seems you're using 32-bit counter for query. Use 64-bit snmp counters instead. It also may be that you set an upper limit of 2^31 (2147483648) in the corresponding data sources, so that high...
- by WGPavell
- Sun Dec 22, 2019 4:03 am
- Forum: Help: General
- Topic: Holes in graphs
- Replies: 6
- Views: 1419
cigamit wrote: ↑Sat Dec 21, 2019 12:34 pm
Change the logging to MEDIUM and look at the actual results coming back from the query.
And how to see them? I trying to search it in clog but I have no records about this graph.
- by WGPavell
- Fri Dec 20, 2019 3:05 am
- Forum: Help: General
- Topic: Holes in graphs
- Replies: 6
- Views: 1419
Sometimes graphs in cacti looks like this:
- Снимок экрана от 2019-12-20 11-01-40.png (53.62 KiB) Viewed 1419 times
I think that is because cacti/rrd/something else can't handle big values but I can mistake.
In rrd file values looks like this:
- Снимок экрана от 2019-12-20 11-01-49.png (26.14 KiB) Viewed 1419 times
So, how to fix this?